Missed and Delayed Diagnoses in the Emergency Department: A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims From 4 Liability Insurers

Allen Kachalia, Tejal K. Gandhi, Ann Louise Puopolo, Catherine Yoon, Eric J. Thomas, Richard Griffey, Troyen A. Brennan, David M. Studdert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study objectives: Diagnostic errors in the emergency department (ED) are an important patient safety concern, but little is known about their cause. We identify types and causes of missed or delayed diagnoses in the ED. Methods: This is a review of 122 closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers in which patients had alleged a missed or delayed diagnosis in the ED. Trained physician reviewers examined the litigation files and the associated medical records to determine whether an adverse outcome because of a missed diagnosis had occurred, what breakdowns were involved in the missed diagnosis, and what factors contributed to it. Main outcome measures were missed diagnoses, process breakdowns, and contributing factors. Results: A total of 79 claims (65%) involved missed ED diagnoses that harmed patients. Forty-eight percent of these missed diagnoses were associated with serious harm, and 39% resulted in death. The leading breakdowns in the diagnostic process were failure to order an appropriate diagnostic test (58% of errors), failure to perform an adequate medical history or physical examination (42%), incorrect interpretation of a diagnostic test (37%), and failure to order an appropriate consultation (33%). The leading contributing factors to the missed diagnoses were cognitive factors (96%), patient-related factors (34%), lack of appropriate supervision (30%), inadequate handoffs (24%), and excessive workload (23%). The median numbers of process breakdowns and contributing factors per missed diagnosis were 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Missed diagnoses in the ED have a complex cause. They are typically the result of multiple breakdowns in the diagnostic process and several contributing factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-205
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of emergency medicine
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Insurance Carriers
Delayed Diagnosis
Malpractice
Hospital Emergency Service
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Jurisprudence
Patient Safety
Workload
Diagnostic Errors
Physical Examination
Medical Records
Referral and Consultation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Missed and Delayed Diagnoses in the Emergency Department : A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims From 4 Liability Insurers. / Kachalia, Allen; Gandhi, Tejal K.; Puopolo, Ann Louise; Yoon, Catherine; Thomas, Eric J.; Griffey, Richard; Brennan, Troyen A.; Studdert, David M.

In: Annals of emergency medicine, Vol. 49, No. 2, 01.02.2007, p. 196-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kachalia, Allen ; Gandhi, Tejal K. ; Puopolo, Ann Louise ; Yoon, Catherine ; Thomas, Eric J. ; Griffey, Richard ; Brennan, Troyen A. ; Studdert, David M. / Missed and Delayed Diagnoses in the Emergency Department : A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims From 4 Liability Insurers. In: Annals of emergency medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 196-205.
@article{1c685b5310e24b8297fd66aa3b6a86bf,
title = "Missed and Delayed Diagnoses in the Emergency Department: A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims From 4 Liability Insurers",
abstract = "Study objectives: Diagnostic errors in the emergency department (ED) are an important patient safety concern, but little is known about their cause. We identify types and causes of missed or delayed diagnoses in the ED. Methods: This is a review of 122 closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers in which patients had alleged a missed or delayed diagnosis in the ED. Trained physician reviewers examined the litigation files and the associated medical records to determine whether an adverse outcome because of a missed diagnosis had occurred, what breakdowns were involved in the missed diagnosis, and what factors contributed to it. Main outcome measures were missed diagnoses, process breakdowns, and contributing factors. Results: A total of 79 claims (65{\%}) involved missed ED diagnoses that harmed patients. Forty-eight percent of these missed diagnoses were associated with serious harm, and 39{\%} resulted in death. The leading breakdowns in the diagnostic process were failure to order an appropriate diagnostic test (58{\%} of errors), failure to perform an adequate medical history or physical examination (42{\%}), incorrect interpretation of a diagnostic test (37{\%}), and failure to order an appropriate consultation (33{\%}). The leading contributing factors to the missed diagnoses were cognitive factors (96{\%}), patient-related factors (34{\%}), lack of appropriate supervision (30{\%}), inadequate handoffs (24{\%}), and excessive workload (23{\%}). The median numbers of process breakdowns and contributing factors per missed diagnosis were 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Missed diagnoses in the ED have a complex cause. They are typically the result of multiple breakdowns in the diagnostic process and several contributing factors.",
author = "Allen Kachalia and Gandhi, {Tejal K.} and Puopolo, {Ann Louise} and Catherine Yoon and Thomas, {Eric J.} and Richard Griffey and Brennan, {Troyen A.} and Studdert, {David M.}",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "196--205",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missed and Delayed Diagnoses in the Emergency Department

T2 - A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims From 4 Liability Insurers

AU - Kachalia, Allen

AU - Gandhi, Tejal K.

AU - Puopolo, Ann Louise

AU - Yoon, Catherine

AU - Thomas, Eric J.

AU - Griffey, Richard

AU - Brennan, Troyen A.

AU - Studdert, David M.

PY - 2007/2/1

Y1 - 2007/2/1

N2 - Study objectives: Diagnostic errors in the emergency department (ED) are an important patient safety concern, but little is known about their cause. We identify types and causes of missed or delayed diagnoses in the ED. Methods: This is a review of 122 closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers in which patients had alleged a missed or delayed diagnosis in the ED. Trained physician reviewers examined the litigation files and the associated medical records to determine whether an adverse outcome because of a missed diagnosis had occurred, what breakdowns were involved in the missed diagnosis, and what factors contributed to it. Main outcome measures were missed diagnoses, process breakdowns, and contributing factors. Results: A total of 79 claims (65%) involved missed ED diagnoses that harmed patients. Forty-eight percent of these missed diagnoses were associated with serious harm, and 39% resulted in death. The leading breakdowns in the diagnostic process were failure to order an appropriate diagnostic test (58% of errors), failure to perform an adequate medical history or physical examination (42%), incorrect interpretation of a diagnostic test (37%), and failure to order an appropriate consultation (33%). The leading contributing factors to the missed diagnoses were cognitive factors (96%), patient-related factors (34%), lack of appropriate supervision (30%), inadequate handoffs (24%), and excessive workload (23%). The median numbers of process breakdowns and contributing factors per missed diagnosis were 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Missed diagnoses in the ED have a complex cause. They are typically the result of multiple breakdowns in the diagnostic process and several contributing factors.

AB - Study objectives: Diagnostic errors in the emergency department (ED) are an important patient safety concern, but little is known about their cause. We identify types and causes of missed or delayed diagnoses in the ED. Methods: This is a review of 122 closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers in which patients had alleged a missed or delayed diagnosis in the ED. Trained physician reviewers examined the litigation files and the associated medical records to determine whether an adverse outcome because of a missed diagnosis had occurred, what breakdowns were involved in the missed diagnosis, and what factors contributed to it. Main outcome measures were missed diagnoses, process breakdowns, and contributing factors. Results: A total of 79 claims (65%) involved missed ED diagnoses that harmed patients. Forty-eight percent of these missed diagnoses were associated with serious harm, and 39% resulted in death. The leading breakdowns in the diagnostic process were failure to order an appropriate diagnostic test (58% of errors), failure to perform an adequate medical history or physical examination (42%), incorrect interpretation of a diagnostic test (37%), and failure to order an appropriate consultation (33%). The leading contributing factors to the missed diagnoses were cognitive factors (96%), patient-related factors (34%), lack of appropriate supervision (30%), inadequate handoffs (24%), and excessive workload (23%). The median numbers of process breakdowns and contributing factors per missed diagnosis were 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Missed diagnoses in the ED have a complex cause. They are typically the result of multiple breakdowns in the diagnostic process and several contributing factors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846261534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846261534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.035

DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.035

M3 - Article

C2 - 16997424

AN - SCOPUS:33846261534

VL - 49

SP - 196

EP - 205

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 2

ER -