Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis: Common features discovered in cases after litigation

Robert A. Rusnak, Joseph M. Borer, Joseph Fastow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To identify differences between correctly diagnosed appendicitis and misdiagnosed cases that resulted in litigation between 1982 and 1989 retrospective review of malpractice claims was conducted. A total of emergency department (ED) charts at the time of the initial ED visit were reviewed and compared with 66 concurrent controls. Missed cases appeared less acutely ill, had fewer complaints of right lower quadrant pain, received fewer rectal examinations, received intramuscular (IM) narcotic pain medication for undiagnosed abdominal pain or symptoms, and more often received an ED discharge diagnosis of gastroenteritis. Misdiagnosed patients had a 91% incidence of ruptured appendix, more extensive surgical procedures, and more postoperative complications. Data were analyzed using the Pearson's χ2 Test, Mann-Whitney U test, and stepwise discriminant analysis. Significance was defined as P ≤ .05. Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis is more likely to occur with patients who present atypically, are not thoroughly examined (as indexed by documentation of a rectal examination), are given IM narcotic pain medication and then discharged from the ED, are diagnosed as having gastroenteritis (despite the absence of the typical diagnostic criteria), and with patients who do not receive appropriate discharge or follow-up instructions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-402
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Appendicitis
Jurisprudence
Diagnostic Errors
Hospital Emergency Service
Narcotics
Gastroenteritis
Pain
Insurance Claim Review
Malpractice
Discriminant Analysis
Nonparametric Statistics
Documentation
Abdominal Pain
Incidence

Keywords

  • Abdomen
  • abdominal pain
  • acute
  • appendicitis
  • litigation
  • malpractice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis : Common features discovered in cases after litigation. / Rusnak, Robert A.; Borer, Joseph M.; Fastow, Joseph.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 4, 01.01.1994, p. 397-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{52b080b547c94ae8a6d8ddb9eb282bdb,
title = "Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis: Common features discovered in cases after litigation",
abstract = "To identify differences between correctly diagnosed appendicitis and misdiagnosed cases that resulted in litigation between 1982 and 1989 retrospective review of malpractice claims was conducted. A total of emergency department (ED) charts at the time of the initial ED visit were reviewed and compared with 66 concurrent controls. Missed cases appeared less acutely ill, had fewer complaints of right lower quadrant pain, received fewer rectal examinations, received intramuscular (IM) narcotic pain medication for undiagnosed abdominal pain or symptoms, and more often received an ED discharge diagnosis of gastroenteritis. Misdiagnosed patients had a 91{\%} incidence of ruptured appendix, more extensive surgical procedures, and more postoperative complications. Data were analyzed using the Pearson's χ2 Test, Mann-Whitney U test, and stepwise discriminant analysis. Significance was defined as P ≤ .05. Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis is more likely to occur with patients who present atypically, are not thoroughly examined (as indexed by documentation of a rectal examination), are given IM narcotic pain medication and then discharged from the ED, are diagnosed as having gastroenteritis (despite the absence of the typical diagnostic criteria), and with patients who do not receive appropriate discharge or follow-up instructions.",
keywords = "Abdomen, abdominal pain, acute, appendicitis, litigation, malpractice",
author = "Rusnak, {Robert A.} and Borer, {Joseph M.} and Joseph Fastow",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0735-6757(94)90047-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "397--402",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis

T2 - Common features discovered in cases after litigation

AU - Rusnak, Robert A.

AU - Borer, Joseph M.

AU - Fastow, Joseph

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - To identify differences between correctly diagnosed appendicitis and misdiagnosed cases that resulted in litigation between 1982 and 1989 retrospective review of malpractice claims was conducted. A total of emergency department (ED) charts at the time of the initial ED visit were reviewed and compared with 66 concurrent controls. Missed cases appeared less acutely ill, had fewer complaints of right lower quadrant pain, received fewer rectal examinations, received intramuscular (IM) narcotic pain medication for undiagnosed abdominal pain or symptoms, and more often received an ED discharge diagnosis of gastroenteritis. Misdiagnosed patients had a 91% incidence of ruptured appendix, more extensive surgical procedures, and more postoperative complications. Data were analyzed using the Pearson's χ2 Test, Mann-Whitney U test, and stepwise discriminant analysis. Significance was defined as P ≤ .05. Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis is more likely to occur with patients who present atypically, are not thoroughly examined (as indexed by documentation of a rectal examination), are given IM narcotic pain medication and then discharged from the ED, are diagnosed as having gastroenteritis (despite the absence of the typical diagnostic criteria), and with patients who do not receive appropriate discharge or follow-up instructions.

AB - To identify differences between correctly diagnosed appendicitis and misdiagnosed cases that resulted in litigation between 1982 and 1989 retrospective review of malpractice claims was conducted. A total of emergency department (ED) charts at the time of the initial ED visit were reviewed and compared with 66 concurrent controls. Missed cases appeared less acutely ill, had fewer complaints of right lower quadrant pain, received fewer rectal examinations, received intramuscular (IM) narcotic pain medication for undiagnosed abdominal pain or symptoms, and more often received an ED discharge diagnosis of gastroenteritis. Misdiagnosed patients had a 91% incidence of ruptured appendix, more extensive surgical procedures, and more postoperative complications. Data were analyzed using the Pearson's χ2 Test, Mann-Whitney U test, and stepwise discriminant analysis. Significance was defined as P ≤ .05. Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis is more likely to occur with patients who present atypically, are not thoroughly examined (as indexed by documentation of a rectal examination), are given IM narcotic pain medication and then discharged from the ED, are diagnosed as having gastroenteritis (despite the absence of the typical diagnostic criteria), and with patients who do not receive appropriate discharge or follow-up instructions.

KW - Abdomen

KW - abdominal pain

KW - acute

KW - appendicitis

KW - litigation

KW - malpractice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028319222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028319222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90047-7

DO - 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90047-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 8031420

AN - SCOPUS:0028319222

VL - 12

SP - 397

EP - 402

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 4

ER -