Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy

a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

Fabio Bagante, Gaya Spolverato, Steven M. Strasberg, Faiz Gani, Vanessa Thompson, Bruce L. Hall, David J. Bentrem, Henry A. Pitt, Timothy M. Pawlik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat liver tumors has increased, data on perioperative outcomes of MIS relative to open liver resection (O-LR) are lacking. We sought to compare short-term outcomes among patients undergoing MIS vs. O-LR in a nationally representative database. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients undergoing hepatectomy between January 1 and December 31, 2014. Propensity score matching algorithm was used to balance differences in baseline characteristics among MIS and O-LR groups. Results: A total of 3064 patients were included in the study. After propensity matching, the baseline characteristics for O-LR and MIS groups were comparable (minimum p value = 0.12). Incidence of superficial surgical site infections, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions, and pulmonary embolism was lower among patients in MIS group compared to O-LR (p <0.02). Liver failure and biliary leakage were also less frequent among patients undergoing MIS (p <0.01). Similarly, MIS was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) compared to O-LR (p <0.001). Of note, 30-day postoperative mortality and readmission were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients undergoing MIS had a lower postoperative morbidity and shorter LOS compared with patients undergoing O-LR. MIS is safe and may be associated with improved short-term outcomes following hepatic surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 13 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Hepatectomy
Quality Improvement
Databases
Liver
Length of Stay
Surgical Wound Infection
Propensity Score
Liver Failure
Pulmonary Embolism
Blood Transfusion
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Liver surgery
  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy : a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. / Bagante, Fabio; Spolverato, Gaya; Strasberg, Steven M.; Gani, Faiz; Thompson, Vanessa; Hall, Bruce L.; Bentrem, David J.; Pitt, Henry A.; Pawlik, Timothy M.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 13.07.2016, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bagante, Fabio ; Spolverato, Gaya ; Strasberg, Steven M. ; Gani, Faiz ; Thompson, Vanessa ; Hall, Bruce L. ; Bentrem, David J. ; Pitt, Henry A. ; Pawlik, Timothy M. / Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy : a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2016 ; pp. 1-10.
@article{ea6508fd780e452d858950375443f0ac,
title = "Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database",
abstract = "Background: While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat liver tumors has increased, data on perioperative outcomes of MIS relative to open liver resection (O-LR) are lacking. We sought to compare short-term outcomes among patients undergoing MIS vs. O-LR in a nationally representative database. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients undergoing hepatectomy between January 1 and December 31, 2014. Propensity score matching algorithm was used to balance differences in baseline characteristics among MIS and O-LR groups. Results: A total of 3064 patients were included in the study. After propensity matching, the baseline characteristics for O-LR and MIS groups were comparable (minimum p value = 0.12). Incidence of superficial surgical site infections, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions, and pulmonary embolism was lower among patients in MIS group compared to O-LR (p <0.02). Liver failure and biliary leakage were also less frequent among patients undergoing MIS (p <0.01). Similarly, MIS was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) compared to O-LR (p <0.001). Of note, 30-day postoperative mortality and readmission were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients undergoing MIS had a lower postoperative morbidity and shorter LOS compared with patients undergoing O-LR. MIS is safe and may be associated with improved short-term outcomes following hepatic surgery.",
keywords = "Laparoscopic surgery, Liver surgery, Minimally invasive surgery, Robotic surgery",
author = "Fabio Bagante and Gaya Spolverato and Strasberg, {Steven M.} and Faiz Gani and Vanessa Thompson and Hall, {Bruce L.} and Bentrem, {David J.} and Pitt, {Henry A.} and Pawlik, {Timothy M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-016-3202-3",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy

T2 - a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

AU - Bagante, Fabio

AU - Spolverato, Gaya

AU - Strasberg, Steven M.

AU - Gani, Faiz

AU - Thompson, Vanessa

AU - Hall, Bruce L.

AU - Bentrem, David J.

AU - Pitt, Henry A.

AU - Pawlik, Timothy M.

PY - 2016/7/13

Y1 - 2016/7/13

N2 - Background: While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat liver tumors has increased, data on perioperative outcomes of MIS relative to open liver resection (O-LR) are lacking. We sought to compare short-term outcomes among patients undergoing MIS vs. O-LR in a nationally representative database. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients undergoing hepatectomy between January 1 and December 31, 2014. Propensity score matching algorithm was used to balance differences in baseline characteristics among MIS and O-LR groups. Results: A total of 3064 patients were included in the study. After propensity matching, the baseline characteristics for O-LR and MIS groups were comparable (minimum p value = 0.12). Incidence of superficial surgical site infections, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions, and pulmonary embolism was lower among patients in MIS group compared to O-LR (p <0.02). Liver failure and biliary leakage were also less frequent among patients undergoing MIS (p <0.01). Similarly, MIS was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) compared to O-LR (p <0.001). Of note, 30-day postoperative mortality and readmission were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients undergoing MIS had a lower postoperative morbidity and shorter LOS compared with patients undergoing O-LR. MIS is safe and may be associated with improved short-term outcomes following hepatic surgery.

AB - Background: While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat liver tumors has increased, data on perioperative outcomes of MIS relative to open liver resection (O-LR) are lacking. We sought to compare short-term outcomes among patients undergoing MIS vs. O-LR in a nationally representative database. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients undergoing hepatectomy between January 1 and December 31, 2014. Propensity score matching algorithm was used to balance differences in baseline characteristics among MIS and O-LR groups. Results: A total of 3064 patients were included in the study. After propensity matching, the baseline characteristics for O-LR and MIS groups were comparable (minimum p value = 0.12). Incidence of superficial surgical site infections, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions, and pulmonary embolism was lower among patients in MIS group compared to O-LR (p <0.02). Liver failure and biliary leakage were also less frequent among patients undergoing MIS (p <0.01). Similarly, MIS was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) compared to O-LR (p <0.001). Of note, 30-day postoperative mortality and readmission were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients undergoing MIS had a lower postoperative morbidity and shorter LOS compared with patients undergoing O-LR. MIS is safe and may be associated with improved short-term outcomes following hepatic surgery.

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

KW - Liver surgery

KW - Minimally invasive surgery

KW - Robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978176898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978176898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-016-3202-3

DO - 10.1007/s11605-016-3202-3

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

ER -