Minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukaemia

Christopher S. Hourigan, Judith E. Karp

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

112 Scopus citations

Abstract

Technological advances in the laboratory have led to substantial improvements in clinical decision making through the introduction of pretreatment prognostic risk stratification factors in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Unfortunately, similar progress has not been made in treatment response criteria, with the definition of 'complete remission' in AML largely unchanged for over half a century. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that high-sensitivity measurements of residual disease burden during or after treatment can be performed, that results are predictive for clinical outcome and can be used to improve outcomes by guiding additional therapeutic intervention to patients in clinical complete remission, but at increased relapse risk. We review these recent trials, the characteristics and challenges of the modalities currently used to detect minimal residual disease (MRD), and outline opportunities to both refine detection and improve clinical use of MRD measurements. MRD measurement is already the standard of care in other myeloid malignancies, such as chronic myelogenous leukaemia and acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). It is our belief that response criteria for non-APL AML should be updated to include assessment for molecular complete remission and recommendations for post-consolidation surveillance should include regular monitoring for molecular relapse as standard of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)460-471
Number of pages12
JournalNature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Volume10
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukaemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this