Metrics of patient, public, consumer, and community engagement in healthcare systems: How should we define engagement, what are we measuring, and does it matter for patient care?: Comment on “metrics evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- system level decision-making: A systematic review”

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In a rigorous systematic review, Dukhanin and colleagues categorize metrics and evaluative tools of the engagement of patient, public, consumer, and community in decision-making in healthcare institutions and systems. The review itself is ably done and the categorizations lead to a useful understanding of the necessary elements of engagement, and a suite of measures relevant to implementing engagement in systems. Nevertheless, the question remains whether the engagement of patient representatives in institutional or systemic deliberations will lead to improved clinical outcomes or increased engagement of individual patients themselves in care. Attention to the conceptual foundations of patient engagement would help make this systematic review relevant to the clinical care of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-50
Number of pages2
JournalInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Patient Participation
Decision Making
Patient Care
Organizations
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Advocacy

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Engagement
  • Patients
  • Shared decision-making
  • Systematic reviews
  • Systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{c3487d6c80bc4ebebe5f7320d8dc81cd,
title = "Metrics of patient, public, consumer, and community engagement in healthcare systems: How should we define engagement, what are we measuring, and does it matter for patient care?: Comment on “metrics evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- system level decision-making: A systematic review”",
abstract = "In a rigorous systematic review, Dukhanin and colleagues categorize metrics and evaluative tools of the engagement of patient, public, consumer, and community in decision-making in healthcare institutions and systems. The review itself is ably done and the categorizations lead to a useful understanding of the necessary elements of engagement, and a suite of measures relevant to implementing engagement in systems. Nevertheless, the question remains whether the engagement of patient representatives in institutional or systemic deliberations will lead to improved clinical outcomes or increased engagement of individual patients themselves in care. Attention to the conceptual foundations of patient engagement would help make this systematic review relevant to the clinical care of patients.",
keywords = "Decision-making, Engagement, Patients, Shared decision-making, Systematic reviews, Systems",
author = "Zackary Berger",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15171/ijhpm.2018.94",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "49--50",
journal = "International Journal of Health Policy and Management",
issn = "2322-5939",
publisher = "Kerman University of Medical Science",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metrics of patient, public, consumer, and community engagement in healthcare systems

T2 - How should we define engagement, what are we measuring, and does it matter for patient care?: Comment on “metrics evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- system level decision-making: A systematic review”

AU - Berger, Zackary

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In a rigorous systematic review, Dukhanin and colleagues categorize metrics and evaluative tools of the engagement of patient, public, consumer, and community in decision-making in healthcare institutions and systems. The review itself is ably done and the categorizations lead to a useful understanding of the necessary elements of engagement, and a suite of measures relevant to implementing engagement in systems. Nevertheless, the question remains whether the engagement of patient representatives in institutional or systemic deliberations will lead to improved clinical outcomes or increased engagement of individual patients themselves in care. Attention to the conceptual foundations of patient engagement would help make this systematic review relevant to the clinical care of patients.

AB - In a rigorous systematic review, Dukhanin and colleagues categorize metrics and evaluative tools of the engagement of patient, public, consumer, and community in decision-making in healthcare institutions and systems. The review itself is ably done and the categorizations lead to a useful understanding of the necessary elements of engagement, and a suite of measures relevant to implementing engagement in systems. Nevertheless, the question remains whether the engagement of patient representatives in institutional or systemic deliberations will lead to improved clinical outcomes or increased engagement of individual patients themselves in care. Attention to the conceptual foundations of patient engagement would help make this systematic review relevant to the clinical care of patients.

KW - Decision-making

KW - Engagement

KW - Patients

KW - Shared decision-making

KW - Systematic reviews

KW - Systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058545302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058545302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.94

DO - 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.94

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 30709102

AN - SCOPUS:85058545302

VL - 8

SP - 49

EP - 50

JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management

JF - International Journal of Health Policy and Management

SN - 2322-5939

IS - 1

ER -