Methylation profiling of mesothelioma using real-time methylation-specific PCR: A pilot study

Robert T. Pu, Zong Mei Sheng, Claire W. Michael, Michael G. Rhode, Douglas P. Clark, Timothy J. O'Leary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We tested whether methylation profiles generated by real-time methylation-specific PCR (MSP) can be useful in differentiating benign, reactive mesothelial cell proliferation (RM) from malignant mesothelioma (MM). Forty-two of the 63 cases (67%) yielded informative results for RARβ2, GPC3, CDKN2A (p16), TERT, and CCND2 (cyclinD2) gene methylation. DNA methylation of any gene was observed in much higher frequency in MM cases than RM cases (63% vs. 33%, P <0.05). Individual gene methylation was higher in the MM than the RM cases for most of the genes; however, this was not statistically significant (RARβ2: 58% vs. 33%, P > 0.05; GPC3: 36% vs. 27%, P > 0.05; CDKN2A: 4% vs. 0%; TERT: 4% vs. 0%), while CCND2 methylation was not detected in any case. Although preliminary, we demonstrate that real-time MSP can be applied to archival specimens and gene methylation profiling may have potential to be a useful ancillary tool to help distinguish MM from RM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)498-502
Number of pages5
JournalDiagnostic Cytopathology
Volume35
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Mesothelioma
Methylation
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Genes
DNA Methylation
Cell Proliferation
Malignant Mesothelioma

Keywords

  • Gene methylatio profiling
  • Mesothelioma
  • Real-time MSP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy

Cite this

Pu, R. T., Sheng, Z. M., Michael, C. W., Rhode, M. G., Clark, D. P., & O'Leary, T. J. (2007). Methylation profiling of mesothelioma using real-time methylation-specific PCR: A pilot study. Diagnostic Cytopathology, 35(8), 498-502. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20692

Methylation profiling of mesothelioma using real-time methylation-specific PCR : A pilot study. / Pu, Robert T.; Sheng, Zong Mei; Michael, Claire W.; Rhode, Michael G.; Clark, Douglas P.; O'Leary, Timothy J.

In: Diagnostic Cytopathology, Vol. 35, No. 8, 08.2007, p. 498-502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pu, RT, Sheng, ZM, Michael, CW, Rhode, MG, Clark, DP & O'Leary, TJ 2007, 'Methylation profiling of mesothelioma using real-time methylation-specific PCR: A pilot study', Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 498-502. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20692
Pu, Robert T. ; Sheng, Zong Mei ; Michael, Claire W. ; Rhode, Michael G. ; Clark, Douglas P. ; O'Leary, Timothy J. / Methylation profiling of mesothelioma using real-time methylation-specific PCR : A pilot study. In: Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2007 ; Vol. 35, No. 8. pp. 498-502.
@article{eaa50a3ba0624bc287fecb2400704107,
title = "Methylation profiling of mesothelioma using real-time methylation-specific PCR: A pilot study",
abstract = "We tested whether methylation profiles generated by real-time methylation-specific PCR (MSP) can be useful in differentiating benign, reactive mesothelial cell proliferation (RM) from malignant mesothelioma (MM). Forty-two of the 63 cases (67{\%}) yielded informative results for RARβ2, GPC3, CDKN2A (p16), TERT, and CCND2 (cyclinD2) gene methylation. DNA methylation of any gene was observed in much higher frequency in MM cases than RM cases (63{\%} vs. 33{\%}, P <0.05). Individual gene methylation was higher in the MM than the RM cases for most of the genes; however, this was not statistically significant (RARβ2: 58{\%} vs. 33{\%}, P > 0.05; GPC3: 36{\%} vs. 27{\%}, P > 0.05; CDKN2A: 4{\%} vs. 0{\%}; TERT: 4{\%} vs. 0{\%}), while CCND2 methylation was not detected in any case. Although preliminary, we demonstrate that real-time MSP can be applied to archival specimens and gene methylation profiling may have potential to be a useful ancillary tool to help distinguish MM from RM.",
keywords = "Gene methylatio profiling, Mesothelioma, Real-time MSP",
author = "Pu, {Robert T.} and Sheng, {Zong Mei} and Michael, {Claire W.} and Rhode, {Michael G.} and Clark, {Douglas P.} and O'Leary, {Timothy J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/dc.20692",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "498--502",
journal = "Diagnostic Cytopathology",
issn = "8755-1039",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methylation profiling of mesothelioma using real-time methylation-specific PCR

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Pu, Robert T.

AU - Sheng, Zong Mei

AU - Michael, Claire W.

AU - Rhode, Michael G.

AU - Clark, Douglas P.

AU - O'Leary, Timothy J.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - We tested whether methylation profiles generated by real-time methylation-specific PCR (MSP) can be useful in differentiating benign, reactive mesothelial cell proliferation (RM) from malignant mesothelioma (MM). Forty-two of the 63 cases (67%) yielded informative results for RARβ2, GPC3, CDKN2A (p16), TERT, and CCND2 (cyclinD2) gene methylation. DNA methylation of any gene was observed in much higher frequency in MM cases than RM cases (63% vs. 33%, P <0.05). Individual gene methylation was higher in the MM than the RM cases for most of the genes; however, this was not statistically significant (RARβ2: 58% vs. 33%, P > 0.05; GPC3: 36% vs. 27%, P > 0.05; CDKN2A: 4% vs. 0%; TERT: 4% vs. 0%), while CCND2 methylation was not detected in any case. Although preliminary, we demonstrate that real-time MSP can be applied to archival specimens and gene methylation profiling may have potential to be a useful ancillary tool to help distinguish MM from RM.

AB - We tested whether methylation profiles generated by real-time methylation-specific PCR (MSP) can be useful in differentiating benign, reactive mesothelial cell proliferation (RM) from malignant mesothelioma (MM). Forty-two of the 63 cases (67%) yielded informative results for RARβ2, GPC3, CDKN2A (p16), TERT, and CCND2 (cyclinD2) gene methylation. DNA methylation of any gene was observed in much higher frequency in MM cases than RM cases (63% vs. 33%, P <0.05). Individual gene methylation was higher in the MM than the RM cases for most of the genes; however, this was not statistically significant (RARβ2: 58% vs. 33%, P > 0.05; GPC3: 36% vs. 27%, P > 0.05; CDKN2A: 4% vs. 0%; TERT: 4% vs. 0%), while CCND2 methylation was not detected in any case. Although preliminary, we demonstrate that real-time MSP can be applied to archival specimens and gene methylation profiling may have potential to be a useful ancillary tool to help distinguish MM from RM.

KW - Gene methylatio profiling

KW - Mesothelioma

KW - Real-time MSP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547940907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547940907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/dc.20692

DO - 10.1002/dc.20692

M3 - Article

C2 - 17636483

AN - SCOPUS:34547940907

VL - 35

SP - 498

EP - 502

JO - Diagnostic Cytopathology

JF - Diagnostic Cytopathology

SN - 8755-1039

IS - 8

ER -