Methods of analyzing physician practice patterns in hypertension

Margaret M. Holmes, David R. Rovner, Marilyn L. Rothert, Neal Schmitt, Charles W. Given, Nicholas S Ialongo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A principal method of studying physician practice patterns has been to examine physicians’ responses to brief written cases. We have compared this method with practice patterns of the same physicians derived from chart audit. Subjects were 98 family practice residents for whom data were available in actual patient encounters for the workup of asymptomatic hypertension. Short, carefully structured case reports using four cues were designed and a checklist similar to the one used for test ordering in practice was employed. Chart reviews and billing encounter forms were used for comparison. Results indicated residents ordered fewer tests in clinical practice, due, in part, to practice constraints not represented in the written cases. Physicians tend to make the diagnosis of hypertension incrementally in practice, with no one visit adequately representing the point of diagnosis. Studies based on data bases using a patient encounter as the unit of analysis in chronic disease such as hypertension may spuriously underestimate the actual number of tests ordered for the workup. Judgment cases may better reflect the patterns of use of information in a well-defined problem. Prediction of number of tests ordered in the clinical setting has not been established in this case.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-68
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Care
Volume27
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physicians' Practice Patterns
Hypertension
Physicians
Family Practice
Checklist
Cues
Chronic Disease
Databases

Keywords

  • Case reports
  • Chart audit
  • Decisionmaking
  • Hypertension
  • Physician practice patterns
  • Practice patterns
  • Response to

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Holmes, M. M., Rovner, D. R., Rothert, M. L., Schmitt, N., Given, C. W., & Ialongo, N. S. (1989). Methods of analyzing physician practice patterns in hypertension. Medical Care, 27(1), 59-68.

Methods of analyzing physician practice patterns in hypertension. / Holmes, Margaret M.; Rovner, David R.; Rothert, Marilyn L.; Schmitt, Neal; Given, Charles W.; Ialongo, Nicholas S.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1989, p. 59-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holmes, MM, Rovner, DR, Rothert, ML, Schmitt, N, Given, CW & Ialongo, NS 1989, 'Methods of analyzing physician practice patterns in hypertension', Medical Care, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 59-68.
Holmes MM, Rovner DR, Rothert ML, Schmitt N, Given CW, Ialongo NS. Methods of analyzing physician practice patterns in hypertension. Medical Care. 1989;27(1):59-68.
Holmes, Margaret M. ; Rovner, David R. ; Rothert, Marilyn L. ; Schmitt, Neal ; Given, Charles W. ; Ialongo, Nicholas S. / Methods of analyzing physician practice patterns in hypertension. In: Medical Care. 1989 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 59-68.
@article{b3c9e1bb49824ee5969e2c876e21ed2b,
title = "Methods of analyzing physician practice patterns in hypertension",
abstract = "A principal method of studying physician practice patterns has been to examine physicians’ responses to brief written cases. We have compared this method with practice patterns of the same physicians derived from chart audit. Subjects were 98 family practice residents for whom data were available in actual patient encounters for the workup of asymptomatic hypertension. Short, carefully structured case reports using four cues were designed and a checklist similar to the one used for test ordering in practice was employed. Chart reviews and billing encounter forms were used for comparison. Results indicated residents ordered fewer tests in clinical practice, due, in part, to practice constraints not represented in the written cases. Physicians tend to make the diagnosis of hypertension incrementally in practice, with no one visit adequately representing the point of diagnosis. Studies based on data bases using a patient encounter as the unit of analysis in chronic disease such as hypertension may spuriously underestimate the actual number of tests ordered for the workup. Judgment cases may better reflect the patterns of use of information in a well-defined problem. Prediction of number of tests ordered in the clinical setting has not been established in this case.",
keywords = "Case reports, Chart audit, Decisionmaking, Hypertension, Physician practice patterns, Practice patterns, Response to",
author = "Holmes, {Margaret M.} and Rovner, {David R.} and Rothert, {Marilyn L.} and Neal Schmitt and Given, {Charles W.} and Ialongo, {Nicholas S}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "59--68",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods of analyzing physician practice patterns in hypertension

AU - Holmes, Margaret M.

AU - Rovner, David R.

AU - Rothert, Marilyn L.

AU - Schmitt, Neal

AU - Given, Charles W.

AU - Ialongo, Nicholas S

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - A principal method of studying physician practice patterns has been to examine physicians’ responses to brief written cases. We have compared this method with practice patterns of the same physicians derived from chart audit. Subjects were 98 family practice residents for whom data were available in actual patient encounters for the workup of asymptomatic hypertension. Short, carefully structured case reports using four cues were designed and a checklist similar to the one used for test ordering in practice was employed. Chart reviews and billing encounter forms were used for comparison. Results indicated residents ordered fewer tests in clinical practice, due, in part, to practice constraints not represented in the written cases. Physicians tend to make the diagnosis of hypertension incrementally in practice, with no one visit adequately representing the point of diagnosis. Studies based on data bases using a patient encounter as the unit of analysis in chronic disease such as hypertension may spuriously underestimate the actual number of tests ordered for the workup. Judgment cases may better reflect the patterns of use of information in a well-defined problem. Prediction of number of tests ordered in the clinical setting has not been established in this case.

AB - A principal method of studying physician practice patterns has been to examine physicians’ responses to brief written cases. We have compared this method with practice patterns of the same physicians derived from chart audit. Subjects were 98 family practice residents for whom data were available in actual patient encounters for the workup of asymptomatic hypertension. Short, carefully structured case reports using four cues were designed and a checklist similar to the one used for test ordering in practice was employed. Chart reviews and billing encounter forms were used for comparison. Results indicated residents ordered fewer tests in clinical practice, due, in part, to practice constraints not represented in the written cases. Physicians tend to make the diagnosis of hypertension incrementally in practice, with no one visit adequately representing the point of diagnosis. Studies based on data bases using a patient encounter as the unit of analysis in chronic disease such as hypertension may spuriously underestimate the actual number of tests ordered for the workup. Judgment cases may better reflect the patterns of use of information in a well-defined problem. Prediction of number of tests ordered in the clinical setting has not been established in this case.

KW - Case reports

KW - Chart audit

KW - Decisionmaking

KW - Hypertension

KW - Physician practice patterns

KW - Practice patterns

KW - Response to

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024568813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024568813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2911219

AN - SCOPUS:0024568813

VL - 27

SP - 59

EP - 68

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 1

ER -