Methodological issues in screening for dementia: The problem of education adjustment

Steven J. Kittner, Lon R. White, Mary E. Farmer, Michael Wolz, Edith Kaplan, Elisabeth Moes, Jacob A. Brody, Manning Feinleib

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The methodological problems of developing efficient and unbiased screening methods for population-based studies of dementia have received scant attention. The potential advantages of education-adjusted screening methods are discussed. The implications for adjustment techniques of a negative correlation of educational attainment with age are emphasized. Two education adjustment methods, a stratified regression method and a nonparametric method, which take the age-education correlation into account are described, compared, and illustrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-170
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Chronic Diseases
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological issues in screening for dementia: The problem of education adjustment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kittner, S. J., White, L. R., Farmer, M. E., Wolz, M., Kaplan, E., Moes, E., Brody, J. A., & Feinleib, M. (1986). Methodological issues in screening for dementia: The problem of education adjustment. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 39(3), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(86)90019-6