Mentorship Is Not Enough: Exploring Sponsorship and Its Role in Career Advancement in Academic Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore how sponsorship functions as a professional relationship in academic medicine. METHOD: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine faculty in 2016: department chairs (sponsors) and faculty participants of an executive leadership development program (protégés). Using editing analysis style, the authors coded interview transcripts for thematic content; a coding framework and themes were derived using an iterative process. RESULTS: Five themes were identified from 23 faculty interviews (12 sponsors, 11 protégés): (1) Mentorship is different: Sponsorship is episodic and focused on specific opportunities; (2) Effective sponsors are career-established and well-connected talent scouts; (3) Effective protégés rise to the task and remain loyal; (4) Trust, respect, and weighing risks are key to successful sponsorship relationships; (5) Sponsorship is critical to career advancement. Sponsorship is distinct from mentorship, though mentors can be sponsors if highly placed and well connected. Effective sponsors have access to networks and provide unequivocal support when promoting protégés. Effective protégés demonstrate potential and make the most of career-advancing opportunities. Successful sponsorship relationships are based on trust, respect, mutual benefits, and understanding potential risks. Sponsorship is critical to advance to high-level leadership roles. Women are perceived as being less likely to seek sponsorship but as needing the extra support sponsorship provides to be successful. CONCLUSIONS: Sponsorship, in addition to mentorship, is critical for successful career advancement. Understanding sponsorship as a distinct professional relationship may help faculty and academic leaders make more informed decisions about using sponsorship as a deliberate career-advancement strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-100
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

career advancement
sponsorship
medicine
respect
interview
career
leadership
scout
coding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{8dd19f1a7d454737a506b7548d322b3e,
title = "Mentorship Is Not Enough: Exploring Sponsorship and Its Role in Career Advancement in Academic Medicine",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To explore how sponsorship functions as a professional relationship in academic medicine. METHOD: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine faculty in 2016: department chairs (sponsors) and faculty participants of an executive leadership development program (prot{\'e}g{\'e}s). Using editing analysis style, the authors coded interview transcripts for thematic content; a coding framework and themes were derived using an iterative process. RESULTS: Five themes were identified from 23 faculty interviews (12 sponsors, 11 prot{\'e}g{\'e}s): (1) Mentorship is different: Sponsorship is episodic and focused on specific opportunities; (2) Effective sponsors are career-established and well-connected talent scouts; (3) Effective prot{\'e}g{\'e}s rise to the task and remain loyal; (4) Trust, respect, and weighing risks are key to successful sponsorship relationships; (5) Sponsorship is critical to career advancement. Sponsorship is distinct from mentorship, though mentors can be sponsors if highly placed and well connected. Effective sponsors have access to networks and provide unequivocal support when promoting prot{\'e}g{\'e}s. Effective prot{\'e}g{\'e}s demonstrate potential and make the most of career-advancing opportunities. Successful sponsorship relationships are based on trust, respect, mutual benefits, and understanding potential risks. Sponsorship is critical to advance to high-level leadership roles. Women are perceived as being less likely to seek sponsorship but as needing the extra support sponsorship provides to be successful. CONCLUSIONS: Sponsorship, in addition to mentorship, is critical for successful career advancement. Understanding sponsorship as a distinct professional relationship may help faculty and academic leaders make more informed decisions about using sponsorship as a deliberate career-advancement strategy.",
author = "Ayyala, {Manasa S.} and Skarupski, {Kimberly A.} and Bodurtha, {Joann N} and {Gonzalez Fernandez}, Marlis and Ishii, {Lisa Earnest} and Fivush, {Barbara A} and Rachel Levine",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000002398",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "94--100",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mentorship Is Not Enough

T2 - Exploring Sponsorship and Its Role in Career Advancement in Academic Medicine

AU - Ayyala, Manasa S.

AU - Skarupski, Kimberly A.

AU - Bodurtha, Joann N

AU - Gonzalez Fernandez, Marlis

AU - Ishii, Lisa Earnest

AU - Fivush, Barbara A

AU - Levine, Rachel

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To explore how sponsorship functions as a professional relationship in academic medicine. METHOD: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine faculty in 2016: department chairs (sponsors) and faculty participants of an executive leadership development program (protégés). Using editing analysis style, the authors coded interview transcripts for thematic content; a coding framework and themes were derived using an iterative process. RESULTS: Five themes were identified from 23 faculty interviews (12 sponsors, 11 protégés): (1) Mentorship is different: Sponsorship is episodic and focused on specific opportunities; (2) Effective sponsors are career-established and well-connected talent scouts; (3) Effective protégés rise to the task and remain loyal; (4) Trust, respect, and weighing risks are key to successful sponsorship relationships; (5) Sponsorship is critical to career advancement. Sponsorship is distinct from mentorship, though mentors can be sponsors if highly placed and well connected. Effective sponsors have access to networks and provide unequivocal support when promoting protégés. Effective protégés demonstrate potential and make the most of career-advancing opportunities. Successful sponsorship relationships are based on trust, respect, mutual benefits, and understanding potential risks. Sponsorship is critical to advance to high-level leadership roles. Women are perceived as being less likely to seek sponsorship but as needing the extra support sponsorship provides to be successful. CONCLUSIONS: Sponsorship, in addition to mentorship, is critical for successful career advancement. Understanding sponsorship as a distinct professional relationship may help faculty and academic leaders make more informed decisions about using sponsorship as a deliberate career-advancement strategy.

AB - PURPOSE: To explore how sponsorship functions as a professional relationship in academic medicine. METHOD: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine faculty in 2016: department chairs (sponsors) and faculty participants of an executive leadership development program (protégés). Using editing analysis style, the authors coded interview transcripts for thematic content; a coding framework and themes were derived using an iterative process. RESULTS: Five themes were identified from 23 faculty interviews (12 sponsors, 11 protégés): (1) Mentorship is different: Sponsorship is episodic and focused on specific opportunities; (2) Effective sponsors are career-established and well-connected talent scouts; (3) Effective protégés rise to the task and remain loyal; (4) Trust, respect, and weighing risks are key to successful sponsorship relationships; (5) Sponsorship is critical to career advancement. Sponsorship is distinct from mentorship, though mentors can be sponsors if highly placed and well connected. Effective sponsors have access to networks and provide unequivocal support when promoting protégés. Effective protégés demonstrate potential and make the most of career-advancing opportunities. Successful sponsorship relationships are based on trust, respect, mutual benefits, and understanding potential risks. Sponsorship is critical to advance to high-level leadership roles. Women are perceived as being less likely to seek sponsorship but as needing the extra support sponsorship provides to be successful. CONCLUSIONS: Sponsorship, in addition to mentorship, is critical for successful career advancement. Understanding sponsorship as a distinct professional relationship may help faculty and academic leaders make more informed decisions about using sponsorship as a deliberate career-advancement strategy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059134957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059134957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002398

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002398

M3 - Article

C2 - 30095456

AN - SCOPUS:85059134957

VL - 94

SP - 94

EP - 100

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 1

ER -