Medicare versus private insurance: rhetoric and reality.

Karen Davis, Cathy Schoen, Michelle Doty, Katie Tenney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many policymakers have called for the remodeling of Medicare to more closely resemble private insurance, which is often assumed to work better than public programs do. However, evidence from this 2001 survey demonstrates that Medicare beneficiaries are generally more satisfied with their health care than are persons under age sixty-five who are covered by private insurance. Medicare beneficiaries report fewer problems getting access to care, greater confidence about their access, and fewer instances of financial hardship as a result of medical bills. Making the program more like private insurance runs the risk of undermining a program that is working well from the perspective of beneficiaries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)W311-324
JournalHealth affairs (Project Hope)
VolumeSuppl Web Exclusives
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Medicare versus private insurance: rhetoric and reality.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this