Medicare payment policy and recombinant erythropoietin prescribing for dialysis patients

N. R. Powe, R. I. Griffiths, Gerard F Anderson, G. De Lissovoy, A. J. Watson, J. W. Greer, R. J. Herbert, P. K. Whelton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Medicare payment policy for recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) treatment for dialysis patients changed in January 1991 from a relatively fixed payment per treatment (allowed charge of $40 per ≤10,000 units injected) to a more variable payment based on the amount of rHuEPO administered with each treatment (allowed charge of $11 per 1,000 units injected). This change provided an opportunity to examine how payment policy can effect the use, cost, and health outcome of a biotechnology product used in the dialysis population. In cross-sectional (n = 71,880 Medicare-entitled dialysis patients) and longitudinal (n = 29,088 Medicare-entitled dialysis patients) study designs, we used Medicare end-stage renal disease program and claims data in bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine the effect of the change in payment policy for rHuEPO on access to the biotechnology, dosing, costs, and hematocrit, including the prescribing patterns at for- profit versus not-for-profit providers. The observation period included several months before (July 1989 to December 1990) and 6 months after (January to June 1991) the change in Medicare payment policy. The mean dose per treatment during the initial and fourth month of therapy was low (2,742 [95% confidence interval, 2,703 to 2,781] units and 2,632 [95% confidence interval, 2,598 to 2,667] units, respectively, in June 1990) and increased 3.4% and 5.0%, respectively, in the next 6 months prior to the change in Medicare payment policy compared with 14.6% and 14.8%, respectively, in the 6 months following the change in payment policy. The average monthly allowed charge for rHuEPO per dialysis patient receiving rHuEPO decreased from $455 before the policy change to $349 immediately following the policy change, because the allowed charge per unit of rHuEPO was lower when payment became more dependent on the amount of rHuEPO administered with each treatment than when the payment was fixed at $40 per treatment. The average monthly allowed charge for rHuEPO increased to $375 in the sixth month following the change in payment policy as a result of the increase in dose and the new variable payment. The unadjusted and adjusted changes in mean hematocrit 6 months after the payment change were positive but clinically very small (0.3 and 0.2 percentage points, respectively). Patients treated at for-profit freestanding and for-profit hospital-based dialysis centers had lower doses prior to the change in Medicare payment and greater (P <0.0001) changes in dose (625 and 671 units, respectively) compared with not-for-profit freestanding centers (346 units), not-for-profit hospital-based centers (391 units), and government centers (103 units), although their doses 6 months after the change in payment policy did not exceed those of patients treated at not- for-profit and government centers. Corresponding but clinically small changes in hematocrit increase were observed by type of center. A change in insurance payment policy appeared to influence rHuEPO dosing practices of dialysis providers, particularly practices at for-profit dialysis centers, in a clinically beneficial direction. There was a trend of increasing average charges for rHuEPO per patient during the short observation period after the change in payment policy, but these charges had not exceeded those prior to the change in payment policy. Continual attention should be paid to understanding how payment policies can affect use, cost, and health outcomes of new medical practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-567
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume22
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Erythropoietin
Medicare
Dialysis
Hematocrit
Biotechnology
Health Care Costs
Therapeutics
Observation
Confidence Intervals
Insurance
Chronic Kidney Failure
Multivariate Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

Powe, N. R., Griffiths, R. I., Anderson, G. F., De Lissovoy, G., Watson, A. J., Greer, J. W., ... Whelton, P. K. (1993). Medicare payment policy and recombinant erythropoietin prescribing for dialysis patients. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 22(4), 557-567.

Medicare payment policy and recombinant erythropoietin prescribing for dialysis patients. / Powe, N. R.; Griffiths, R. I.; Anderson, Gerard F; De Lissovoy, G.; Watson, A. J.; Greer, J. W.; Herbert, R. J.; Whelton, P. K.

In: American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1993, p. 557-567.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Powe, NR, Griffiths, RI, Anderson, GF, De Lissovoy, G, Watson, AJ, Greer, JW, Herbert, RJ & Whelton, PK 1993, 'Medicare payment policy and recombinant erythropoietin prescribing for dialysis patients', American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 557-567.
Powe, N. R. ; Griffiths, R. I. ; Anderson, Gerard F ; De Lissovoy, G. ; Watson, A. J. ; Greer, J. W. ; Herbert, R. J. ; Whelton, P. K. / Medicare payment policy and recombinant erythropoietin prescribing for dialysis patients. In: American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 1993 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 557-567.
@article{1569677b2a17408686fe702fe0ebb018,
title = "Medicare payment policy and recombinant erythropoietin prescribing for dialysis patients",
abstract = "The Medicare payment policy for recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) treatment for dialysis patients changed in January 1991 from a relatively fixed payment per treatment (allowed charge of $40 per ≤10,000 units injected) to a more variable payment based on the amount of rHuEPO administered with each treatment (allowed charge of $11 per 1,000 units injected). This change provided an opportunity to examine how payment policy can effect the use, cost, and health outcome of a biotechnology product used in the dialysis population. In cross-sectional (n = 71,880 Medicare-entitled dialysis patients) and longitudinal (n = 29,088 Medicare-entitled dialysis patients) study designs, we used Medicare end-stage renal disease program and claims data in bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine the effect of the change in payment policy for rHuEPO on access to the biotechnology, dosing, costs, and hematocrit, including the prescribing patterns at for- profit versus not-for-profit providers. The observation period included several months before (July 1989 to December 1990) and 6 months after (January to June 1991) the change in Medicare payment policy. The mean dose per treatment during the initial and fourth month of therapy was low (2,742 [95{\%} confidence interval, 2,703 to 2,781] units and 2,632 [95{\%} confidence interval, 2,598 to 2,667] units, respectively, in June 1990) and increased 3.4{\%} and 5.0{\%}, respectively, in the next 6 months prior to the change in Medicare payment policy compared with 14.6{\%} and 14.8{\%}, respectively, in the 6 months following the change in payment policy. The average monthly allowed charge for rHuEPO per dialysis patient receiving rHuEPO decreased from $455 before the policy change to $349 immediately following the policy change, because the allowed charge per unit of rHuEPO was lower when payment became more dependent on the amount of rHuEPO administered with each treatment than when the payment was fixed at $40 per treatment. The average monthly allowed charge for rHuEPO increased to $375 in the sixth month following the change in payment policy as a result of the increase in dose and the new variable payment. The unadjusted and adjusted changes in mean hematocrit 6 months after the payment change were positive but clinically very small (0.3 and 0.2 percentage points, respectively). Patients treated at for-profit freestanding and for-profit hospital-based dialysis centers had lower doses prior to the change in Medicare payment and greater (P <0.0001) changes in dose (625 and 671 units, respectively) compared with not-for-profit freestanding centers (346 units), not-for-profit hospital-based centers (391 units), and government centers (103 units), although their doses 6 months after the change in payment policy did not exceed those of patients treated at not- for-profit and government centers. Corresponding but clinically small changes in hematocrit increase were observed by type of center. A change in insurance payment policy appeared to influence rHuEPO dosing practices of dialysis providers, particularly practices at for-profit dialysis centers, in a clinically beneficial direction. There was a trend of increasing average charges for rHuEPO per patient during the short observation period after the change in payment policy, but these charges had not exceeded those prior to the change in payment policy. Continual attention should be paid to understanding how payment policies can affect use, cost, and health outcomes of new medical practices.",
author = "Powe, {N. R.} and Griffiths, {R. I.} and Anderson, {Gerard F} and {De Lissovoy}, G. and Watson, {A. J.} and Greer, {J. W.} and Herbert, {R. J.} and Whelton, {P. K.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "557--567",
journal = "American Journal of Kidney Diseases",
issn = "0272-6386",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medicare payment policy and recombinant erythropoietin prescribing for dialysis patients

AU - Powe, N. R.

AU - Griffiths, R. I.

AU - Anderson, Gerard F

AU - De Lissovoy, G.

AU - Watson, A. J.

AU - Greer, J. W.

AU - Herbert, R. J.

AU - Whelton, P. K.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The Medicare payment policy for recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) treatment for dialysis patients changed in January 1991 from a relatively fixed payment per treatment (allowed charge of $40 per ≤10,000 units injected) to a more variable payment based on the amount of rHuEPO administered with each treatment (allowed charge of $11 per 1,000 units injected). This change provided an opportunity to examine how payment policy can effect the use, cost, and health outcome of a biotechnology product used in the dialysis population. In cross-sectional (n = 71,880 Medicare-entitled dialysis patients) and longitudinal (n = 29,088 Medicare-entitled dialysis patients) study designs, we used Medicare end-stage renal disease program and claims data in bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine the effect of the change in payment policy for rHuEPO on access to the biotechnology, dosing, costs, and hematocrit, including the prescribing patterns at for- profit versus not-for-profit providers. The observation period included several months before (July 1989 to December 1990) and 6 months after (January to June 1991) the change in Medicare payment policy. The mean dose per treatment during the initial and fourth month of therapy was low (2,742 [95% confidence interval, 2,703 to 2,781] units and 2,632 [95% confidence interval, 2,598 to 2,667] units, respectively, in June 1990) and increased 3.4% and 5.0%, respectively, in the next 6 months prior to the change in Medicare payment policy compared with 14.6% and 14.8%, respectively, in the 6 months following the change in payment policy. The average monthly allowed charge for rHuEPO per dialysis patient receiving rHuEPO decreased from $455 before the policy change to $349 immediately following the policy change, because the allowed charge per unit of rHuEPO was lower when payment became more dependent on the amount of rHuEPO administered with each treatment than when the payment was fixed at $40 per treatment. The average monthly allowed charge for rHuEPO increased to $375 in the sixth month following the change in payment policy as a result of the increase in dose and the new variable payment. The unadjusted and adjusted changes in mean hematocrit 6 months after the payment change were positive but clinically very small (0.3 and 0.2 percentage points, respectively). Patients treated at for-profit freestanding and for-profit hospital-based dialysis centers had lower doses prior to the change in Medicare payment and greater (P <0.0001) changes in dose (625 and 671 units, respectively) compared with not-for-profit freestanding centers (346 units), not-for-profit hospital-based centers (391 units), and government centers (103 units), although their doses 6 months after the change in payment policy did not exceed those of patients treated at not- for-profit and government centers. Corresponding but clinically small changes in hematocrit increase were observed by type of center. A change in insurance payment policy appeared to influence rHuEPO dosing practices of dialysis providers, particularly practices at for-profit dialysis centers, in a clinically beneficial direction. There was a trend of increasing average charges for rHuEPO per patient during the short observation period after the change in payment policy, but these charges had not exceeded those prior to the change in payment policy. Continual attention should be paid to understanding how payment policies can affect use, cost, and health outcomes of new medical practices.

AB - The Medicare payment policy for recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) treatment for dialysis patients changed in January 1991 from a relatively fixed payment per treatment (allowed charge of $40 per ≤10,000 units injected) to a more variable payment based on the amount of rHuEPO administered with each treatment (allowed charge of $11 per 1,000 units injected). This change provided an opportunity to examine how payment policy can effect the use, cost, and health outcome of a biotechnology product used in the dialysis population. In cross-sectional (n = 71,880 Medicare-entitled dialysis patients) and longitudinal (n = 29,088 Medicare-entitled dialysis patients) study designs, we used Medicare end-stage renal disease program and claims data in bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine the effect of the change in payment policy for rHuEPO on access to the biotechnology, dosing, costs, and hematocrit, including the prescribing patterns at for- profit versus not-for-profit providers. The observation period included several months before (July 1989 to December 1990) and 6 months after (January to June 1991) the change in Medicare payment policy. The mean dose per treatment during the initial and fourth month of therapy was low (2,742 [95% confidence interval, 2,703 to 2,781] units and 2,632 [95% confidence interval, 2,598 to 2,667] units, respectively, in June 1990) and increased 3.4% and 5.0%, respectively, in the next 6 months prior to the change in Medicare payment policy compared with 14.6% and 14.8%, respectively, in the 6 months following the change in payment policy. The average monthly allowed charge for rHuEPO per dialysis patient receiving rHuEPO decreased from $455 before the policy change to $349 immediately following the policy change, because the allowed charge per unit of rHuEPO was lower when payment became more dependent on the amount of rHuEPO administered with each treatment than when the payment was fixed at $40 per treatment. The average monthly allowed charge for rHuEPO increased to $375 in the sixth month following the change in payment policy as a result of the increase in dose and the new variable payment. The unadjusted and adjusted changes in mean hematocrit 6 months after the payment change were positive but clinically very small (0.3 and 0.2 percentage points, respectively). Patients treated at for-profit freestanding and for-profit hospital-based dialysis centers had lower doses prior to the change in Medicare payment and greater (P <0.0001) changes in dose (625 and 671 units, respectively) compared with not-for-profit freestanding centers (346 units), not-for-profit hospital-based centers (391 units), and government centers (103 units), although their doses 6 months after the change in payment policy did not exceed those of patients treated at not- for-profit and government centers. Corresponding but clinically small changes in hematocrit increase were observed by type of center. A change in insurance payment policy appeared to influence rHuEPO dosing practices of dialysis providers, particularly practices at for-profit dialysis centers, in a clinically beneficial direction. There was a trend of increasing average charges for rHuEPO per patient during the short observation period after the change in payment policy, but these charges had not exceeded those prior to the change in payment policy. Continual attention should be paid to understanding how payment policies can affect use, cost, and health outcomes of new medical practices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027370361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027370361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8213796

AN - SCOPUS:0027370361

VL - 22

SP - 557

EP - 567

JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases

JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases

SN - 0272-6386

IS - 4

ER -