Medically complex Children in foster care: Do research "protections" make this "vulnerable population" more vulnerable?

Rebecca Seltzer, Megan Kasimatis Singleton, Erin P. Williams, Renee D. Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Children in foster care are considered a "vulnerable population" in clinical care and research, with good reason. These children face multiple medical, psychological, and social risks that obligate the child welfare and healthcare systems to protect them from further harms. An unintended consequence of the "vulnerable population" designation for children in foster care is that it may impose barriers on tracking and studying their health that creates gaps in knowledge that are key to their receipt of medical care and good outcomes. These gaps in knowledge have implications for justice, beneficence, and maleficence and serve to undermine "protection" of this population. Here we review the challenges of research regarding children in foster care, particularly medically complex children, and offer specific recommendations to include children in foster care in medical research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-149
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Ethics
Volume29
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Vulnerable Populations
Research
Beneficence
medical research
Health Services Research
Social Justice
Child Welfare
child welfare
medical care
justice
Psychology
Delivery of Health Care
Health
health
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Medically complex Children in foster care : Do research "protections" make this "vulnerable population" more vulnerable? / Seltzer, Rebecca; Singleton, Megan Kasimatis; Williams, Erin P.; Ross, Renee D.

In: Journal of Clinical Ethics, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 145-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seltzer, Rebecca ; Singleton, Megan Kasimatis ; Williams, Erin P. ; Ross, Renee D. / Medically complex Children in foster care : Do research "protections" make this "vulnerable population" more vulnerable?. In: Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2018 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 145-149.
@article{d26740265bcf49358a270092a24a195e,
title = "Medically complex Children in foster care: Do research {"}protections{"} make this {"}vulnerable population{"} more vulnerable?",
abstract = "Children in foster care are considered a {"}vulnerable population{"} in clinical care and research, with good reason. These children face multiple medical, psychological, and social risks that obligate the child welfare and healthcare systems to protect them from further harms. An unintended consequence of the {"}vulnerable population{"} designation for children in foster care is that it may impose barriers on tracking and studying their health that creates gaps in knowledge that are key to their receipt of medical care and good outcomes. These gaps in knowledge have implications for justice, beneficence, and maleficence and serve to undermine {"}protection{"} of this population. Here we review the challenges of research regarding children in foster care, particularly medically complex children, and offer specific recommendations to include children in foster care in medical research.",
author = "Rebecca Seltzer and Singleton, {Megan Kasimatis} and Williams, {Erin P.} and Ross, {Renee D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "145--149",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Ethics",
issn = "1046-7890",
publisher = "Journal of Clinical Ethics",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medically complex Children in foster care

T2 - Do research "protections" make this "vulnerable population" more vulnerable?

AU - Seltzer, Rebecca

AU - Singleton, Megan Kasimatis

AU - Williams, Erin P.

AU - Ross, Renee D.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Children in foster care are considered a "vulnerable population" in clinical care and research, with good reason. These children face multiple medical, psychological, and social risks that obligate the child welfare and healthcare systems to protect them from further harms. An unintended consequence of the "vulnerable population" designation for children in foster care is that it may impose barriers on tracking and studying their health that creates gaps in knowledge that are key to their receipt of medical care and good outcomes. These gaps in knowledge have implications for justice, beneficence, and maleficence and serve to undermine "protection" of this population. Here we review the challenges of research regarding children in foster care, particularly medically complex children, and offer specific recommendations to include children in foster care in medical research.

AB - Children in foster care are considered a "vulnerable population" in clinical care and research, with good reason. These children face multiple medical, psychological, and social risks that obligate the child welfare and healthcare systems to protect them from further harms. An unintended consequence of the "vulnerable population" designation for children in foster care is that it may impose barriers on tracking and studying their health that creates gaps in knowledge that are key to their receipt of medical care and good outcomes. These gaps in knowledge have implications for justice, beneficence, and maleficence and serve to undermine "protection" of this population. Here we review the challenges of research regarding children in foster care, particularly medically complex children, and offer specific recommendations to include children in foster care in medical research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051380553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051380553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 30129744

AN - SCOPUS:85051380553

VL - 29

SP - 145

EP - 149

JO - Journal of Clinical Ethics

JF - Journal of Clinical Ethics

SN - 1046-7890

IS - 2

ER -