Medical Malpractice in Uveitis: A Review of Clinical Entities and Outcomes

Ashvini Reddy, Stephanie B. Engelhard, Christopher T. Shah, Austin J. Sim, Jennifer Thorne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To guide risk management in uveitis. Methods: Retrospective review of malpractice verdicts, rulings, and settlements. Results: The WestLaw® database was reviewed for lawsuits related to uveitis in the United States from 1930–2014. Twenty-five cases met inclusion criteria, and 48% of these were infectious. Overall, 64% of outcomes favored the defendant ophthalmologist. The most common diagnoses were viral retinitis (28%), iritis (12%), syphilis (8%), and toxoplasmosis (8%). Seven suits (28%) were resolved by settlement, with mean adjusted indemnities of $724,302 (median, $409,390; range, $127,837–2,021,887). Two cases (8%) resulted in plaintiff verdict, with adjusted awards of $1,399,800 and $630,799. Conclusions: Despite being a rare diagnosis, viral retinitis (especially acute retinal necrosis) is the most common clinical entity associated with litigation in uveitis and should be considered early. Educating patients about potential adverse events, early testing for syphilis, and maintaining a positive relationship may also minimize risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalOcular Immunology and Inflammation
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 9 2016

Fingerprint

Malpractice
Uveitis
Retinitis
Syphilis
Acute Retinal Necrosis Syndrome
Iritis
Toxoplasmosis
Risk Management
Jurisprudence
Insurance
Databases

Keywords

  • Acute retinal necrosis
  • litigation
  • malpractice
  • uveitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Medical Malpractice in Uveitis : A Review of Clinical Entities and Outcomes. / Reddy, Ashvini; Engelhard, Stephanie B.; Shah, Christopher T.; Sim, Austin J.; Thorne, Jennifer.

In: Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, 09.08.2016, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reddy, Ashvini ; Engelhard, Stephanie B. ; Shah, Christopher T. ; Sim, Austin J. ; Thorne, Jennifer. / Medical Malpractice in Uveitis : A Review of Clinical Entities and Outcomes. In: Ocular Immunology and Inflammation. 2016 ; pp. 1-7.
@article{d5b42bb3ed7348d2b75575183821f54f,
title = "Medical Malpractice in Uveitis: A Review of Clinical Entities and Outcomes",
abstract = "Purpose: To guide risk management in uveitis. Methods: Retrospective review of malpractice verdicts, rulings, and settlements. Results: The WestLaw{\circledR} database was reviewed for lawsuits related to uveitis in the United States from 1930–2014. Twenty-five cases met inclusion criteria, and 48{\%} of these were infectious. Overall, 64{\%} of outcomes favored the defendant ophthalmologist. The most common diagnoses were viral retinitis (28{\%}), iritis (12{\%}), syphilis (8{\%}), and toxoplasmosis (8{\%}). Seven suits (28{\%}) were resolved by settlement, with mean adjusted indemnities of $724,302 (median, $409,390; range, $127,837–2,021,887). Two cases (8{\%}) resulted in plaintiff verdict, with adjusted awards of $1,399,800 and $630,799. Conclusions: Despite being a rare diagnosis, viral retinitis (especially acute retinal necrosis) is the most common clinical entity associated with litigation in uveitis and should be considered early. Educating patients about potential adverse events, early testing for syphilis, and maintaining a positive relationship may also minimize risk.",
keywords = "Acute retinal necrosis, litigation, malpractice, uveitis",
author = "Ashvini Reddy and Engelhard, {Stephanie B.} and Shah, {Christopher T.} and Sim, {Austin J.} and Jennifer Thorne",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1080/09273948.2016.1202289",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Ocular Immunology and Inflammation",
issn = "0927-3948",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical Malpractice in Uveitis

T2 - A Review of Clinical Entities and Outcomes

AU - Reddy, Ashvini

AU - Engelhard, Stephanie B.

AU - Shah, Christopher T.

AU - Sim, Austin J.

AU - Thorne, Jennifer

PY - 2016/8/9

Y1 - 2016/8/9

N2 - Purpose: To guide risk management in uveitis. Methods: Retrospective review of malpractice verdicts, rulings, and settlements. Results: The WestLaw® database was reviewed for lawsuits related to uveitis in the United States from 1930–2014. Twenty-five cases met inclusion criteria, and 48% of these were infectious. Overall, 64% of outcomes favored the defendant ophthalmologist. The most common diagnoses were viral retinitis (28%), iritis (12%), syphilis (8%), and toxoplasmosis (8%). Seven suits (28%) were resolved by settlement, with mean adjusted indemnities of $724,302 (median, $409,390; range, $127,837–2,021,887). Two cases (8%) resulted in plaintiff verdict, with adjusted awards of $1,399,800 and $630,799. Conclusions: Despite being a rare diagnosis, viral retinitis (especially acute retinal necrosis) is the most common clinical entity associated with litigation in uveitis and should be considered early. Educating patients about potential adverse events, early testing for syphilis, and maintaining a positive relationship may also minimize risk.

AB - Purpose: To guide risk management in uveitis. Methods: Retrospective review of malpractice verdicts, rulings, and settlements. Results: The WestLaw® database was reviewed for lawsuits related to uveitis in the United States from 1930–2014. Twenty-five cases met inclusion criteria, and 48% of these were infectious. Overall, 64% of outcomes favored the defendant ophthalmologist. The most common diagnoses were viral retinitis (28%), iritis (12%), syphilis (8%), and toxoplasmosis (8%). Seven suits (28%) were resolved by settlement, with mean adjusted indemnities of $724,302 (median, $409,390; range, $127,837–2,021,887). Two cases (8%) resulted in plaintiff verdict, with adjusted awards of $1,399,800 and $630,799. Conclusions: Despite being a rare diagnosis, viral retinitis (especially acute retinal necrosis) is the most common clinical entity associated with litigation in uveitis and should be considered early. Educating patients about potential adverse events, early testing for syphilis, and maintaining a positive relationship may also minimize risk.

KW - Acute retinal necrosis

KW - litigation

KW - malpractice

KW - uveitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981513421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981513421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09273948.2016.1202289

DO - 10.1080/09273948.2016.1202289

M3 - Article

C2 - 27715388

AN - SCOPUS:84981513421

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Ocular Immunology and Inflammation

JF - Ocular Immunology and Inflammation

SN - 0927-3948

ER -