Mediators of focused psychosocial support interventions for children in low-resource humanitarian settings: analysis from an Individual Participant Dataset with 3,143 participants

Marianna Purgato, Federico Tedeschi, Theresa S. Betancourt, Paul Bolton, Chiara Bonetto, Chiara Gastaldon, James Gordon, Paul O’Callaghan, Davide Papola, Kirsi Peltonen, Raija Leena Punamaki, Justin Richards, Julie K. Staples, Johanna Unterhitzenberger, Joop de Jong, Mark J.D. Jordans, Alden L. Gross, Wietse A. Tol, Corrado Barbui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Research on psychosocial interventions has been focused on the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on mental health outcomes, without exploring how interventions achieve beneficial effects. Identifying the potential pathways through which interventions work would potentially allow further strengthening of interventions by emphasizing specific components connected with such pathways. Methods: We conducted a preplanned mediation analysis using individual participant data from a dataset of 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared focused psychosocial support interventions versus control conditions for children living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) affected by humanitarian crises. Based on an ecological resilience framework, we hypothesized that (a) coping, (b) hope, (c) social support, and (d) functional impairment mediate the relationship between intervention and outcome PTSD symptoms. A systematic search on the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PubMed, PyscARTICLES, Web of Science, and the main local LMICs databases was conducted up to August 2018. The hypotheses were tested by using individual participant data obtained from study authors of all the studies included in the systematic review. Results: We included 3,143 children from 11 studies (100% of data from included studies), of which 1,877 from six studies contributed to the mediation analysis. Functional impairment was the strongest mediator for focused psychosocial interventions on PTSD (mediation coefficient −0.087, standard error 0.040). The estimated proportion of effect mediated by functional impairment, and adjusted for confounders, was 31%. Conclusions: Findings did not support the proposed mediation hypotheses for coping, hope, and social support. The mediation through functional impairment may represent unmeasured proxy measures or point to a broader mechanism that impacts self-efficacy and agency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)584-593
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
Volume61
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2020

Keywords

  • Mediation analysis
  • children
  • humanitarian setting
  • individual participant data
  • trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mediators of focused psychosocial support interventions for children in low-resource humanitarian settings: analysis from an Individual Participant Dataset with 3,143 participants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Purgato, M., Tedeschi, F., Betancourt, T. S., Bolton, P., Bonetto, C., Gastaldon, C., Gordon, J., O’Callaghan, P., Papola, D., Peltonen, K., Punamaki, R. L., Richards, J., Staples, J. K., Unterhitzenberger, J., de Jong, J., Jordans, M. J. D., Gross, A. L., Tol, W. A., & Barbui, C. (2020). Mediators of focused psychosocial support interventions for children in low-resource humanitarian settings: analysis from an Individual Participant Dataset with 3,143 participants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 61(5), 584-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13151