Mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation: An international survey of practices and preferences

Alison Beer, Robert M. Reed, Servet Bölükbas, Marie Budev, George Chaux, Martin R. Zamora, Gregory Snell, Jonathan B Orens, Julia A. Klesney-Tait, Gregory A. Schmidt, Roy G Brower, Michael Eberlein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rationale: Between 10% and 57% of lung transplant (LTx) recipients develop primary graft dysfunction (PGD) within 72 hours of LTx. PGD is clinically and histologically analogous to the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In patients at risk for or with acute respiratory distress syndrome, lung-protective ventilation strategies (low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure) improve outcomes. There is, however, little information available on mechanical ventilation strategies after LTx. Objectives: Our aim in this international survey was to describe the current practices of mechanical ventilation immediately after LTx. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to the medical and surgical directors of U.S. LTx programs (n = 111) and to members of the Pulmonary Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (n = 470). Results: A total of 149 individuals from 18 countries responded to the questionnaire. The most common modes of ventilation were pressure assist/control (37%) and volume assist/control (35%). Tidal volumes were most often determined by recipient characteristics. Donor characteristics were rarely considered (35%) and were infrequently known by the team managing the ventilator (42%).When presented with a choice of ideal tidal volumes, a majority of respondents selected 6 ml/kg recipient predicted body weight (58%), fewer selected 10ml/kg (21%), and none selected 15 ml/kg. A majority preferred limiting the fraction of inspired oxygen rather than positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (69% versus 31%, P = 0.006). The median minimum PEEP was 5 cm H2O, and the median maximum PEEP was 11.5 cm H2O. The presence of PGD increased the perceived importance of monitoring plateau pressure to adjust tidal volumes. The median plateau pressure limit perceived as a threshold triggering reduction in tidal volume was 30 cm H2O. Conclusions: Most respondents reported using lung-protective approaches to mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation. Low tidal volumes based on recipient characteristics were frequently chosen. Donor characteristics often were not considered and frequently were not known by the team managing mechanical ventilation after LTx.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)546-553
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Lung Transplantation
Tidal Volume
Artificial Respiration
Primary Graft Dysfunction
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Lung
Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Pressure
Ventilation
Tissue Donors
Physician Executives
Mechanical Ventilators
Surveys and Questionnaires
Body Weight
Oxygen

Keywords

  • Lung protective ventilation
  • Lung transplantation
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Primary graft dysfunction
  • Tidal volume

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation : An international survey of practices and preferences. / Beer, Alison; Reed, Robert M.; Bölükbas, Servet; Budev, Marie; Chaux, George; Zamora, Martin R.; Snell, Gregory; Orens, Jonathan B; Klesney-Tait, Julia A.; Schmidt, Gregory A.; Brower, Roy G; Eberlein, Michael.

In: Annals of the American Thoracic Society, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2014, p. 546-553.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beer, A, Reed, RM, Bölükbas, S, Budev, M, Chaux, G, Zamora, MR, Snell, G, Orens, JB, Klesney-Tait, JA, Schmidt, GA, Brower, RG & Eberlein, M 2014, 'Mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation: An international survey of practices and preferences', Annals of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201312-419OC
Beer, Alison ; Reed, Robert M. ; Bölükbas, Servet ; Budev, Marie ; Chaux, George ; Zamora, Martin R. ; Snell, Gregory ; Orens, Jonathan B ; Klesney-Tait, Julia A. ; Schmidt, Gregory A. ; Brower, Roy G ; Eberlein, Michael. / Mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation : An international survey of practices and preferences. In: Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 546-553.
@article{eeda65ae88e24bdeadc9f51816481a0b,
title = "Mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation: An international survey of practices and preferences",
abstract = "Rationale: Between 10{\%} and 57{\%} of lung transplant (LTx) recipients develop primary graft dysfunction (PGD) within 72 hours of LTx. PGD is clinically and histologically analogous to the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In patients at risk for or with acute respiratory distress syndrome, lung-protective ventilation strategies (low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure) improve outcomes. There is, however, little information available on mechanical ventilation strategies after LTx. Objectives: Our aim in this international survey was to describe the current practices of mechanical ventilation immediately after LTx. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to the medical and surgical directors of U.S. LTx programs (n = 111) and to members of the Pulmonary Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (n = 470). Results: A total of 149 individuals from 18 countries responded to the questionnaire. The most common modes of ventilation were pressure assist/control (37{\%}) and volume assist/control (35{\%}). Tidal volumes were most often determined by recipient characteristics. Donor characteristics were rarely considered (35{\%}) and were infrequently known by the team managing the ventilator (42{\%}).When presented with a choice of ideal tidal volumes, a majority of respondents selected 6 ml/kg recipient predicted body weight (58{\%}), fewer selected 10ml/kg (21{\%}), and none selected 15 ml/kg. A majority preferred limiting the fraction of inspired oxygen rather than positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (69{\%} versus 31{\%}, P = 0.006). The median minimum PEEP was 5 cm H2O, and the median maximum PEEP was 11.5 cm H2O. The presence of PGD increased the perceived importance of monitoring plateau pressure to adjust tidal volumes. The median plateau pressure limit perceived as a threshold triggering reduction in tidal volume was 30 cm H2O. Conclusions: Most respondents reported using lung-protective approaches to mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation. Low tidal volumes based on recipient characteristics were frequently chosen. Donor characteristics often were not considered and frequently were not known by the team managing mechanical ventilation after LTx.",
keywords = "Lung protective ventilation, Lung transplantation, Mechanical ventilation, Primary graft dysfunction, Tidal volume",
author = "Alison Beer and Reed, {Robert M.} and Servet B{\"o}l{\"u}kbas and Marie Budev and George Chaux and Zamora, {Martin R.} and Gregory Snell and Orens, {Jonathan B} and Klesney-Tait, {Julia A.} and Schmidt, {Gregory A.} and Brower, {Roy G} and Michael Eberlein",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1513/AnnalsATS.201312-419OC",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "546--553",
journal = "Annals of the American Thoracic Society",
issn = "2325-6621",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation

T2 - An international survey of practices and preferences

AU - Beer, Alison

AU - Reed, Robert M.

AU - Bölükbas, Servet

AU - Budev, Marie

AU - Chaux, George

AU - Zamora, Martin R.

AU - Snell, Gregory

AU - Orens, Jonathan B

AU - Klesney-Tait, Julia A.

AU - Schmidt, Gregory A.

AU - Brower, Roy G

AU - Eberlein, Michael

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Rationale: Between 10% and 57% of lung transplant (LTx) recipients develop primary graft dysfunction (PGD) within 72 hours of LTx. PGD is clinically and histologically analogous to the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In patients at risk for or with acute respiratory distress syndrome, lung-protective ventilation strategies (low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure) improve outcomes. There is, however, little information available on mechanical ventilation strategies after LTx. Objectives: Our aim in this international survey was to describe the current practices of mechanical ventilation immediately after LTx. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to the medical and surgical directors of U.S. LTx programs (n = 111) and to members of the Pulmonary Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (n = 470). Results: A total of 149 individuals from 18 countries responded to the questionnaire. The most common modes of ventilation were pressure assist/control (37%) and volume assist/control (35%). Tidal volumes were most often determined by recipient characteristics. Donor characteristics were rarely considered (35%) and were infrequently known by the team managing the ventilator (42%).When presented with a choice of ideal tidal volumes, a majority of respondents selected 6 ml/kg recipient predicted body weight (58%), fewer selected 10ml/kg (21%), and none selected 15 ml/kg. A majority preferred limiting the fraction of inspired oxygen rather than positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (69% versus 31%, P = 0.006). The median minimum PEEP was 5 cm H2O, and the median maximum PEEP was 11.5 cm H2O. The presence of PGD increased the perceived importance of monitoring plateau pressure to adjust tidal volumes. The median plateau pressure limit perceived as a threshold triggering reduction in tidal volume was 30 cm H2O. Conclusions: Most respondents reported using lung-protective approaches to mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation. Low tidal volumes based on recipient characteristics were frequently chosen. Donor characteristics often were not considered and frequently were not known by the team managing mechanical ventilation after LTx.

AB - Rationale: Between 10% and 57% of lung transplant (LTx) recipients develop primary graft dysfunction (PGD) within 72 hours of LTx. PGD is clinically and histologically analogous to the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In patients at risk for or with acute respiratory distress syndrome, lung-protective ventilation strategies (low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure) improve outcomes. There is, however, little information available on mechanical ventilation strategies after LTx. Objectives: Our aim in this international survey was to describe the current practices of mechanical ventilation immediately after LTx. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to the medical and surgical directors of U.S. LTx programs (n = 111) and to members of the Pulmonary Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (n = 470). Results: A total of 149 individuals from 18 countries responded to the questionnaire. The most common modes of ventilation were pressure assist/control (37%) and volume assist/control (35%). Tidal volumes were most often determined by recipient characteristics. Donor characteristics were rarely considered (35%) and were infrequently known by the team managing the ventilator (42%).When presented with a choice of ideal tidal volumes, a majority of respondents selected 6 ml/kg recipient predicted body weight (58%), fewer selected 10ml/kg (21%), and none selected 15 ml/kg. A majority preferred limiting the fraction of inspired oxygen rather than positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (69% versus 31%, P = 0.006). The median minimum PEEP was 5 cm H2O, and the median maximum PEEP was 11.5 cm H2O. The presence of PGD increased the perceived importance of monitoring plateau pressure to adjust tidal volumes. The median plateau pressure limit perceived as a threshold triggering reduction in tidal volume was 30 cm H2O. Conclusions: Most respondents reported using lung-protective approaches to mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation. Low tidal volumes based on recipient characteristics were frequently chosen. Donor characteristics often were not considered and frequently were not known by the team managing mechanical ventilation after LTx.

KW - Lung protective ventilation

KW - Lung transplantation

KW - Mechanical ventilation

KW - Primary graft dysfunction

KW - Tidal volume

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903616202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903616202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201312-419OC

DO - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201312-419OC

M3 - Article

C2 - 24640938

AN - SCOPUS:84903616202

VL - 11

SP - 546

EP - 553

JO - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

JF - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

SN - 2325-6621

IS - 4

ER -