Measuring progression of Lens opacities for longitudinal studies

Sheila K West, Beatriz Munoz, Fang Wang, Hugh Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A number of classifications schemes for the grading of lens opacities have been developed but none of them have been examined for reliability and validity in prospective or longitudinal studies. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a method for determining progression which was sufficiently sensitive to true change and insensitive to measurement error. The method consists of assessing various sources of measurement error, determining the likely magnitude of the error, and setting boundaries for changes in opacification which incorporate this error. Measurement error was assessed in 203 nuclear lens photographs graded using a decimal system and 136 cortical lens photographs graded in 1/16th area. 95% confidence intervals were calculated of the distribution of differences between photographs and graders and the width of this intervals defined as measurement error. The magnitude of the measurement error was ± 0.7 units for nuclear opacities and ± 2/16 for cortical opacities. The utility of this approach was tested in a series of 84 clinic patients followed at irregular intervals for up to 3 years. Only one eye showed "improvement" and progression rates ranged from 1.8 to 5.5% for nuclear opacities and 0 to 7.4% for cortical opacities in this clinic-based series. This approach appears to be useful for discarding noise and enabling the assessment of progression for use in longitudinal studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-132
Number of pages10
JournalCurrent Eye Research
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Cataract
Lenses
Longitudinal Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Noise
Research Design
Prospective Studies
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Measuring progression of Lens opacities for longitudinal studies. / West, Sheila K; Munoz, Beatriz; Wang, Fang; Taylor, Hugh.

In: Current Eye Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1993, p. 123-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d13b2f7860084a36b95d0ee5c6ad29f4,
title = "Measuring progression of Lens opacities for longitudinal studies",
abstract = "A number of classifications schemes for the grading of lens opacities have been developed but none of them have been examined for reliability and validity in prospective or longitudinal studies. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a method for determining progression which was sufficiently sensitive to true change and insensitive to measurement error. The method consists of assessing various sources of measurement error, determining the likely magnitude of the error, and setting boundaries for changes in opacification which incorporate this error. Measurement error was assessed in 203 nuclear lens photographs graded using a decimal system and 136 cortical lens photographs graded in 1/16th area. 95{\%} confidence intervals were calculated of the distribution of differences between photographs and graders and the width of this intervals defined as measurement error. The magnitude of the measurement error was ± 0.7 units for nuclear opacities and ± 2/16 for cortical opacities. The utility of this approach was tested in a series of 84 clinic patients followed at irregular intervals for up to 3 years. Only one eye showed {"}improvement{"} and progression rates ranged from 1.8 to 5.5{\%} for nuclear opacities and 0 to 7.4{\%} for cortical opacities in this clinic-based series. This approach appears to be useful for discarding noise and enabling the assessment of progression for use in longitudinal studies.",
author = "West, {Sheila K} and Beatriz Munoz and Fang Wang and Hugh Taylor",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.3109/02713689308999480",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "123--132",
journal = "Current Eye Research",
issn = "0271-3683",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring progression of Lens opacities for longitudinal studies

AU - West, Sheila K

AU - Munoz, Beatriz

AU - Wang, Fang

AU - Taylor, Hugh

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - A number of classifications schemes for the grading of lens opacities have been developed but none of them have been examined for reliability and validity in prospective or longitudinal studies. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a method for determining progression which was sufficiently sensitive to true change and insensitive to measurement error. The method consists of assessing various sources of measurement error, determining the likely magnitude of the error, and setting boundaries for changes in opacification which incorporate this error. Measurement error was assessed in 203 nuclear lens photographs graded using a decimal system and 136 cortical lens photographs graded in 1/16th area. 95% confidence intervals were calculated of the distribution of differences between photographs and graders and the width of this intervals defined as measurement error. The magnitude of the measurement error was ± 0.7 units for nuclear opacities and ± 2/16 for cortical opacities. The utility of this approach was tested in a series of 84 clinic patients followed at irregular intervals for up to 3 years. Only one eye showed "improvement" and progression rates ranged from 1.8 to 5.5% for nuclear opacities and 0 to 7.4% for cortical opacities in this clinic-based series. This approach appears to be useful for discarding noise and enabling the assessment of progression for use in longitudinal studies.

AB - A number of classifications schemes for the grading of lens opacities have been developed but none of them have been examined for reliability and validity in prospective or longitudinal studies. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a method for determining progression which was sufficiently sensitive to true change and insensitive to measurement error. The method consists of assessing various sources of measurement error, determining the likely magnitude of the error, and setting boundaries for changes in opacification which incorporate this error. Measurement error was assessed in 203 nuclear lens photographs graded using a decimal system and 136 cortical lens photographs graded in 1/16th area. 95% confidence intervals were calculated of the distribution of differences between photographs and graders and the width of this intervals defined as measurement error. The magnitude of the measurement error was ± 0.7 units for nuclear opacities and ± 2/16 for cortical opacities. The utility of this approach was tested in a series of 84 clinic patients followed at irregular intervals for up to 3 years. Only one eye showed "improvement" and progression rates ranged from 1.8 to 5.5% for nuclear opacities and 0 to 7.4% for cortical opacities in this clinic-based series. This approach appears to be useful for discarding noise and enabling the assessment of progression for use in longitudinal studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027407264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027407264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/02713689308999480

DO - 10.3109/02713689308999480

M3 - Article

C2 - 8449023

AN - SCOPUS:0027407264

VL - 12

SP - 123

EP - 132

JO - Current Eye Research

JF - Current Eye Research

SN - 0271-3683

IS - 2

ER -