Measuring nerve regeneration in the mouse

John W. Griffin, Baohan Pan, Michelle A. Polley, Paul N. Hoffman, Mohamed H Farah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Genetic engineering of mice has become a major tool in understanding the roles of individual molecules in regeneration of nerves, and will play an increasing role in the future. Mice are in many ways well suited to assessment both of nerve regeneration after axotomy and of collateral sprouting of intact fibers into areas of denervation. However, mouse models present special challenges because of their small size, their inherent capacity for regeneration, and the potential strain effects. The most widely used model of regeneration, sciatic nerve injury, has its inherent limitations, and there is a need for other models of injury to long nerves.Measures of regeneration in the mouse can be divided into those that assess the latency to initiate growth, those sensitive to the rate of growth and the proportion of fibers growing at fast rates, those that assess the time to reinnervation of specific targets and the completeness of reinnervation, and those that assess specificity of reinnervation and functional recovery. The short length of nerve available in the mouse limits measures of the rates of outgrowth, and thus introduces a greater potential for "noise" of measurement than is seen in larger animals such as the rat. For both regeneration of interrupted fibers and collateral regeneration from intact fibers histological and physiological measures of "time to target" have the advantages of direct correlation with restoration of function, the ability to assess regeneration of different fiber types efficiently, and the fact that most of these measures are easier in the mouse than in the rat.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-71
Number of pages12
JournalExperimental Neurology
Volume223
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Nerve Regeneration
Regeneration
Axotomy
Genetic Engineering
Wounds and Injuries
Denervation
Sciatic Nerve
Growth
Noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Measuring nerve regeneration in the mouse. / Griffin, John W.; Pan, Baohan; Polley, Michelle A.; Hoffman, Paul N.; Farah, Mohamed H.

In: Experimental Neurology, Vol. 223, No. 1, 05.2010, p. 60-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Griffin, John W. ; Pan, Baohan ; Polley, Michelle A. ; Hoffman, Paul N. ; Farah, Mohamed H. / Measuring nerve regeneration in the mouse. In: Experimental Neurology. 2010 ; Vol. 223, No. 1. pp. 60-71.
@article{cff487098f03435687f82360f9d02502,
title = "Measuring nerve regeneration in the mouse",
abstract = "Genetic engineering of mice has become a major tool in understanding the roles of individual molecules in regeneration of nerves, and will play an increasing role in the future. Mice are in many ways well suited to assessment both of nerve regeneration after axotomy and of collateral sprouting of intact fibers into areas of denervation. However, mouse models present special challenges because of their small size, their inherent capacity for regeneration, and the potential strain effects. The most widely used model of regeneration, sciatic nerve injury, has its inherent limitations, and there is a need for other models of injury to long nerves.Measures of regeneration in the mouse can be divided into those that assess the latency to initiate growth, those sensitive to the rate of growth and the proportion of fibers growing at fast rates, those that assess the time to reinnervation of specific targets and the completeness of reinnervation, and those that assess specificity of reinnervation and functional recovery. The short length of nerve available in the mouse limits measures of the rates of outgrowth, and thus introduces a greater potential for {"}noise{"} of measurement than is seen in larger animals such as the rat. For both regeneration of interrupted fibers and collateral regeneration from intact fibers histological and physiological measures of {"}time to target{"} have the advantages of direct correlation with restoration of function, the ability to assess regeneration of different fiber types efficiently, and the fact that most of these measures are easier in the mouse than in the rat.",
author = "Griffin, {John W.} and Baohan Pan and Polley, {Michelle A.} and Hoffman, {Paul N.} and Farah, {Mohamed H}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "223",
pages = "60--71",
journal = "Experimental Neurology",
issn = "0014-4886",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring nerve regeneration in the mouse

AU - Griffin, John W.

AU - Pan, Baohan

AU - Polley, Michelle A.

AU - Hoffman, Paul N.

AU - Farah, Mohamed H

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Genetic engineering of mice has become a major tool in understanding the roles of individual molecules in regeneration of nerves, and will play an increasing role in the future. Mice are in many ways well suited to assessment both of nerve regeneration after axotomy and of collateral sprouting of intact fibers into areas of denervation. However, mouse models present special challenges because of their small size, their inherent capacity for regeneration, and the potential strain effects. The most widely used model of regeneration, sciatic nerve injury, has its inherent limitations, and there is a need for other models of injury to long nerves.Measures of regeneration in the mouse can be divided into those that assess the latency to initiate growth, those sensitive to the rate of growth and the proportion of fibers growing at fast rates, those that assess the time to reinnervation of specific targets and the completeness of reinnervation, and those that assess specificity of reinnervation and functional recovery. The short length of nerve available in the mouse limits measures of the rates of outgrowth, and thus introduces a greater potential for "noise" of measurement than is seen in larger animals such as the rat. For both regeneration of interrupted fibers and collateral regeneration from intact fibers histological and physiological measures of "time to target" have the advantages of direct correlation with restoration of function, the ability to assess regeneration of different fiber types efficiently, and the fact that most of these measures are easier in the mouse than in the rat.

AB - Genetic engineering of mice has become a major tool in understanding the roles of individual molecules in regeneration of nerves, and will play an increasing role in the future. Mice are in many ways well suited to assessment both of nerve regeneration after axotomy and of collateral sprouting of intact fibers into areas of denervation. However, mouse models present special challenges because of their small size, their inherent capacity for regeneration, and the potential strain effects. The most widely used model of regeneration, sciatic nerve injury, has its inherent limitations, and there is a need for other models of injury to long nerves.Measures of regeneration in the mouse can be divided into those that assess the latency to initiate growth, those sensitive to the rate of growth and the proportion of fibers growing at fast rates, those that assess the time to reinnervation of specific targets and the completeness of reinnervation, and those that assess specificity of reinnervation and functional recovery. The short length of nerve available in the mouse limits measures of the rates of outgrowth, and thus introduces a greater potential for "noise" of measurement than is seen in larger animals such as the rat. For both regeneration of interrupted fibers and collateral regeneration from intact fibers histological and physiological measures of "time to target" have the advantages of direct correlation with restoration of function, the ability to assess regeneration of different fiber types efficiently, and the fact that most of these measures are easier in the mouse than in the rat.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950866200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950866200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.033

DO - 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.033

M3 - Article

VL - 223

SP - 60

EP - 71

JO - Experimental Neurology

JF - Experimental Neurology

SN - 0014-4886

IS - 1

ER -