Measuring contributions to the research mission of medical schools

Edward W. Holmes, Thomas F. Burks, Victor Dzau, Michael A. Hindery, Robert F. Jones, Celia I. Kaye, David Korn, Lee E. Limbird, Richard B. Marchase, Roger Perlmutter, Fred Sanfilippo, Brian L. Strom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors of this article, who were the members and staff of a research panel formed by the AAMC as part of its mission-based management initiative, reflect on the growing interest in quantitative information in the management of the research mission of medical schools. They note the serious limitations of any such system of measures for research, particularly its inability to represent directly the quality of the research effort. Despite these concerns, the authors acknowledge that leaders in academic medicine have always used quantitative measures in one form or another to compare performance or assess progress. Two factors appear to be driving increases in this practice: (1) the need to demonstrate to institutional stakeholders that resources are being used wisely and that the school's performance justifies continued investment in the research mission; and (2) the need to fashion an economic strategy to manage precious institutional resources, particularly research space. Given these realities, the authors offer guidelines for the proper development and use of measures to assess contributions by faculty, departments, and institutions to the research mission. They also comment on the measures most commonly used in four areas: grants and other revenue-generating activities; publications; faculty members' research reputation and contributions to the national research enterprise; and support to the general research mission of the school. The authors conclude that quantitative information can help institutional leaders in important management decisions. However, the potential for misuse is great. The key is always to regard this information as an aid to judgment, not a substitute for it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-313
Number of pages11
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume75
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Schools
Research
school
leader
Information Management
Organized Financing
management decision
management
resources
reputation
performance
grant
Publications
revenue
stakeholder
Economics
Medicine
medicine
Guidelines
staff

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

Holmes, E. W., Burks, T. F., Dzau, V., Hindery, M. A., Jones, R. F., Kaye, C. I., ... Strom, B. L. (2000). Measuring contributions to the research mission of medical schools. Academic Medicine, 75(3), 303-313.

Measuring contributions to the research mission of medical schools. / Holmes, Edward W.; Burks, Thomas F.; Dzau, Victor; Hindery, Michael A.; Jones, Robert F.; Kaye, Celia I.; Korn, David; Limbird, Lee E.; Marchase, Richard B.; Perlmutter, Roger; Sanfilippo, Fred; Strom, Brian L.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 75, No. 3, 03.2000, p. 303-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holmes, EW, Burks, TF, Dzau, V, Hindery, MA, Jones, RF, Kaye, CI, Korn, D, Limbird, LE, Marchase, RB, Perlmutter, R, Sanfilippo, F & Strom, BL 2000, 'Measuring contributions to the research mission of medical schools', Academic Medicine, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 303-313.
Holmes EW, Burks TF, Dzau V, Hindery MA, Jones RF, Kaye CI et al. Measuring contributions to the research mission of medical schools. Academic Medicine. 2000 Mar;75(3):303-313.
Holmes, Edward W. ; Burks, Thomas F. ; Dzau, Victor ; Hindery, Michael A. ; Jones, Robert F. ; Kaye, Celia I. ; Korn, David ; Limbird, Lee E. ; Marchase, Richard B. ; Perlmutter, Roger ; Sanfilippo, Fred ; Strom, Brian L. / Measuring contributions to the research mission of medical schools. In: Academic Medicine. 2000 ; Vol. 75, No. 3. pp. 303-313.
@article{f686a5ae5036494e9eb225af49849e0f,
title = "Measuring contributions to the research mission of medical schools",
abstract = "The authors of this article, who were the members and staff of a research panel formed by the AAMC as part of its mission-based management initiative, reflect on the growing interest in quantitative information in the management of the research mission of medical schools. They note the serious limitations of any such system of measures for research, particularly its inability to represent directly the quality of the research effort. Despite these concerns, the authors acknowledge that leaders in academic medicine have always used quantitative measures in one form or another to compare performance or assess progress. Two factors appear to be driving increases in this practice: (1) the need to demonstrate to institutional stakeholders that resources are being used wisely and that the school's performance justifies continued investment in the research mission; and (2) the need to fashion an economic strategy to manage precious institutional resources, particularly research space. Given these realities, the authors offer guidelines for the proper development and use of measures to assess contributions by faculty, departments, and institutions to the research mission. They also comment on the measures most commonly used in four areas: grants and other revenue-generating activities; publications; faculty members' research reputation and contributions to the national research enterprise; and support to the general research mission of the school. The authors conclude that quantitative information can help institutional leaders in important management decisions. However, the potential for misuse is great. The key is always to regard this information as an aid to judgment, not a substitute for it.",
author = "Holmes, {Edward W.} and Burks, {Thomas F.} and Victor Dzau and Hindery, {Michael A.} and Jones, {Robert F.} and Kaye, {Celia I.} and David Korn and Limbird, {Lee E.} and Marchase, {Richard B.} and Roger Perlmutter and Fred Sanfilippo and Strom, {Brian L.}",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "303--313",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring contributions to the research mission of medical schools

AU - Holmes, Edward W.

AU - Burks, Thomas F.

AU - Dzau, Victor

AU - Hindery, Michael A.

AU - Jones, Robert F.

AU - Kaye, Celia I.

AU - Korn, David

AU - Limbird, Lee E.

AU - Marchase, Richard B.

AU - Perlmutter, Roger

AU - Sanfilippo, Fred

AU - Strom, Brian L.

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - The authors of this article, who were the members and staff of a research panel formed by the AAMC as part of its mission-based management initiative, reflect on the growing interest in quantitative information in the management of the research mission of medical schools. They note the serious limitations of any such system of measures for research, particularly its inability to represent directly the quality of the research effort. Despite these concerns, the authors acknowledge that leaders in academic medicine have always used quantitative measures in one form or another to compare performance or assess progress. Two factors appear to be driving increases in this practice: (1) the need to demonstrate to institutional stakeholders that resources are being used wisely and that the school's performance justifies continued investment in the research mission; and (2) the need to fashion an economic strategy to manage precious institutional resources, particularly research space. Given these realities, the authors offer guidelines for the proper development and use of measures to assess contributions by faculty, departments, and institutions to the research mission. They also comment on the measures most commonly used in four areas: grants and other revenue-generating activities; publications; faculty members' research reputation and contributions to the national research enterprise; and support to the general research mission of the school. The authors conclude that quantitative information can help institutional leaders in important management decisions. However, the potential for misuse is great. The key is always to regard this information as an aid to judgment, not a substitute for it.

AB - The authors of this article, who were the members and staff of a research panel formed by the AAMC as part of its mission-based management initiative, reflect on the growing interest in quantitative information in the management of the research mission of medical schools. They note the serious limitations of any such system of measures for research, particularly its inability to represent directly the quality of the research effort. Despite these concerns, the authors acknowledge that leaders in academic medicine have always used quantitative measures in one form or another to compare performance or assess progress. Two factors appear to be driving increases in this practice: (1) the need to demonstrate to institutional stakeholders that resources are being used wisely and that the school's performance justifies continued investment in the research mission; and (2) the need to fashion an economic strategy to manage precious institutional resources, particularly research space. Given these realities, the authors offer guidelines for the proper development and use of measures to assess contributions by faculty, departments, and institutions to the research mission. They also comment on the measures most commonly used in four areas: grants and other revenue-generating activities; publications; faculty members' research reputation and contributions to the national research enterprise; and support to the general research mission of the school. The authors conclude that quantitative information can help institutional leaders in important management decisions. However, the potential for misuse is great. The key is always to regard this information as an aid to judgment, not a substitute for it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17144441727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17144441727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10724325

AN - SCOPUS:17144441727

VL - 75

SP - 303

EP - 313

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 3

ER -