Measurement of Quality and Assurance of Safety in the Critically Ill

Peter J. Pronovost, J. Bryan Sexton, Julius Cuong Pham, Christine A. Goeschel, Bradford D Winters, Marlene R. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The global health care community has worked tirelessly for nearly a decade to make medical care safer for patients, but it still has limited ability to evaluate whether safety has improved. While there is a universal push to measure safety outcomes, the main barrier has been poor investment in the basic science of patient safety. This science would allow us to comprehend the causes of harm, design and pilot test interventions to reduce harm, and robustly evaluate their impact. This article describes several dilemmas in measuring patient safety, outlines a conceptual model and presents a framework for measuring patient safety, and offers future directions. Future research should seek to create a scientifically sound and feasible safety scorecard and improve performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-179
Number of pages11
JournalClinics in Chest Medicine
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Critical Illness
Safety
Patient Care
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Measurement
  • Measuring patient safety
  • Outcomes
  • Patient safety
  • Quality of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Measurement of Quality and Assurance of Safety in the Critically Ill. / Pronovost, Peter J.; Sexton, J. Bryan; Pham, Julius Cuong; Goeschel, Christine A.; Winters, Bradford D; Miller, Marlene R.

In: Clinics in Chest Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 1, 03.2009, p. 169-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pronovost, Peter J. ; Sexton, J. Bryan ; Pham, Julius Cuong ; Goeschel, Christine A. ; Winters, Bradford D ; Miller, Marlene R. / Measurement of Quality and Assurance of Safety in the Critically Ill. In: Clinics in Chest Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 169-179.
@article{189c31f83de944408144486a9bd17b8d,
title = "Measurement of Quality and Assurance of Safety in the Critically Ill",
abstract = "The global health care community has worked tirelessly for nearly a decade to make medical care safer for patients, but it still has limited ability to evaluate whether safety has improved. While there is a universal push to measure safety outcomes, the main barrier has been poor investment in the basic science of patient safety. This science would allow us to comprehend the causes of harm, design and pilot test interventions to reduce harm, and robustly evaluate their impact. This article describes several dilemmas in measuring patient safety, outlines a conceptual model and presents a framework for measuring patient safety, and offers future directions. Future research should seek to create a scientifically sound and feasible safety scorecard and improve performance.",
keywords = "Measurement, Measuring patient safety, Outcomes, Patient safety, Quality of care",
author = "Pronovost, {Peter J.} and Sexton, {J. Bryan} and Pham, {Julius Cuong} and Goeschel, {Christine A.} and Winters, {Bradford D} and Miller, {Marlene R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.ccm.2008.09.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "169--179",
journal = "Clinics in Chest Medicine",
issn = "0272-5231",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of Quality and Assurance of Safety in the Critically Ill

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

AU - Sexton, J. Bryan

AU - Pham, Julius Cuong

AU - Goeschel, Christine A.

AU - Winters, Bradford D

AU - Miller, Marlene R.

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - The global health care community has worked tirelessly for nearly a decade to make medical care safer for patients, but it still has limited ability to evaluate whether safety has improved. While there is a universal push to measure safety outcomes, the main barrier has been poor investment in the basic science of patient safety. This science would allow us to comprehend the causes of harm, design and pilot test interventions to reduce harm, and robustly evaluate their impact. This article describes several dilemmas in measuring patient safety, outlines a conceptual model and presents a framework for measuring patient safety, and offers future directions. Future research should seek to create a scientifically sound and feasible safety scorecard and improve performance.

AB - The global health care community has worked tirelessly for nearly a decade to make medical care safer for patients, but it still has limited ability to evaluate whether safety has improved. While there is a universal push to measure safety outcomes, the main barrier has been poor investment in the basic science of patient safety. This science would allow us to comprehend the causes of harm, design and pilot test interventions to reduce harm, and robustly evaluate their impact. This article describes several dilemmas in measuring patient safety, outlines a conceptual model and presents a framework for measuring patient safety, and offers future directions. Future research should seek to create a scientifically sound and feasible safety scorecard and improve performance.

KW - Measurement

KW - Measuring patient safety

KW - Outcomes

KW - Patient safety

KW - Quality of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58749095891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58749095891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.09.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 19186288

AN - SCOPUS:58749095891

VL - 30

SP - 169

EP - 179

JO - Clinics in Chest Medicine

JF - Clinics in Chest Medicine

SN - 0272-5231

IS - 1

ER -