Measurement of implementation components and contextual factors in a two-state healthcare quality initiative to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia

Kisha Jezel Ali, Donna O. Farley, Kathleen Speck, Mary Catanzaro, Karol G. Wicker, Sean Berenholtz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

objective. To develop and field test an implementation assessment tool for assessing progress of hospital units in implementing improvements for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in a two-state collaborative, including data on actions implemented by participating teams and contextual factors that may influence their efforts. Using the data collected, learn how implementation actions can be improved and analyze effects of implementation progress on outcome measures. design. We developed the tool as an interview protocol that included quantitative and qualitative items addressing actions on the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) and clinical interventions for use in guiding data collection via telephone interviews. setting. We conducted interviews with leaders of improvement teams from units participating in the two-state VAP prevention initiative. methods. We collected data from 43 hospital units as they implemented actions for the VAP initiative and performed descriptive analyzes of the data with comparisons across the 2 states. results. Early in the VAP prevention initiative, most units had made only moderate progress overall in using many of the CUSP actions known to support their improvement processes. For contextual factors, a relatively small number of barriers were found to have important negative effects on implementation progress (in particular, barriers related to workload and time issues). We modified coaching provided to the unit teams to reinforce training in weak spots that the interviews identified. conclusion. These assessments provided important new knowledge regarding the implementation science of quality improvement projects, including feedback during implementation, and give a better understanding of which factors most affect implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S116-S123
JournalInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Volume35
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Quality of Health Care
Interviews
Hospital Units
Safety
Quality Improvement
Workload
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Epidemiology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Measurement of implementation components and contextual factors in a two-state healthcare quality initiative to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia. / Ali, Kisha Jezel; Farley, Donna O.; Speck, Kathleen; Catanzaro, Mary; Wicker, Karol G.; Berenholtz, Sean.

In: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 35, 01.10.2014, p. S116-S123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b0a8c1b7caa43b9b1a29bda10aac222,
title = "Measurement of implementation components and contextual factors in a two-state healthcare quality initiative to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia",
abstract = "objective. To develop and field test an implementation assessment tool for assessing progress of hospital units in implementing improvements for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in a two-state collaborative, including data on actions implemented by participating teams and contextual factors that may influence their efforts. Using the data collected, learn how implementation actions can be improved and analyze effects of implementation progress on outcome measures. design. We developed the tool as an interview protocol that included quantitative and qualitative items addressing actions on the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) and clinical interventions for use in guiding data collection via telephone interviews. setting. We conducted interviews with leaders of improvement teams from units participating in the two-state VAP prevention initiative. methods. We collected data from 43 hospital units as they implemented actions for the VAP initiative and performed descriptive analyzes of the data with comparisons across the 2 states. results. Early in the VAP prevention initiative, most units had made only moderate progress overall in using many of the CUSP actions known to support their improvement processes. For contextual factors, a relatively small number of barriers were found to have important negative effects on implementation progress (in particular, barriers related to workload and time issues). We modified coaching provided to the unit teams to reinforce training in weak spots that the interviews identified. conclusion. These assessments provided important new knowledge regarding the implementation science of quality improvement projects, including feedback during implementation, and give a better understanding of which factors most affect implementation.",
author = "Ali, {Kisha Jezel} and Farley, {Donna O.} and Kathleen Speck and Mary Catanzaro and Wicker, {Karol G.} and Sean Berenholtz",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/677832",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "S116--S123",
journal = "Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology",
issn = "0899-823X",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of implementation components and contextual factors in a two-state healthcare quality initiative to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia

AU - Ali, Kisha Jezel

AU - Farley, Donna O.

AU - Speck, Kathleen

AU - Catanzaro, Mary

AU - Wicker, Karol G.

AU - Berenholtz, Sean

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - objective. To develop and field test an implementation assessment tool for assessing progress of hospital units in implementing improvements for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in a two-state collaborative, including data on actions implemented by participating teams and contextual factors that may influence their efforts. Using the data collected, learn how implementation actions can be improved and analyze effects of implementation progress on outcome measures. design. We developed the tool as an interview protocol that included quantitative and qualitative items addressing actions on the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) and clinical interventions for use in guiding data collection via telephone interviews. setting. We conducted interviews with leaders of improvement teams from units participating in the two-state VAP prevention initiative. methods. We collected data from 43 hospital units as they implemented actions for the VAP initiative and performed descriptive analyzes of the data with comparisons across the 2 states. results. Early in the VAP prevention initiative, most units had made only moderate progress overall in using many of the CUSP actions known to support their improvement processes. For contextual factors, a relatively small number of barriers were found to have important negative effects on implementation progress (in particular, barriers related to workload and time issues). We modified coaching provided to the unit teams to reinforce training in weak spots that the interviews identified. conclusion. These assessments provided important new knowledge regarding the implementation science of quality improvement projects, including feedback during implementation, and give a better understanding of which factors most affect implementation.

AB - objective. To develop and field test an implementation assessment tool for assessing progress of hospital units in implementing improvements for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in a two-state collaborative, including data on actions implemented by participating teams and contextual factors that may influence their efforts. Using the data collected, learn how implementation actions can be improved and analyze effects of implementation progress on outcome measures. design. We developed the tool as an interview protocol that included quantitative and qualitative items addressing actions on the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) and clinical interventions for use in guiding data collection via telephone interviews. setting. We conducted interviews with leaders of improvement teams from units participating in the two-state VAP prevention initiative. methods. We collected data from 43 hospital units as they implemented actions for the VAP initiative and performed descriptive analyzes of the data with comparisons across the 2 states. results. Early in the VAP prevention initiative, most units had made only moderate progress overall in using many of the CUSP actions known to support their improvement processes. For contextual factors, a relatively small number of barriers were found to have important negative effects on implementation progress (in particular, barriers related to workload and time issues). We modified coaching provided to the unit teams to reinforce training in weak spots that the interviews identified. conclusion. These assessments provided important new knowledge regarding the implementation science of quality improvement projects, including feedback during implementation, and give a better understanding of which factors most affect implementation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907980264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907980264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/677832

DO - 10.1086/677832

M3 - Article

C2 - 25222890

AN - SCOPUS:84907980264

VL - 35

SP - S116-S123

JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

SN - 0899-823X

ER -