Mathematical models: An extension of the clinician's mind

R. John Leigh, David S. Zee

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Traditionally, clinicians have used their experience and intuition to diagnose and treat disease states, including neurological disorders. However, the rapid increase in basic knowledge, coupled with a realization that human judgments are often flawed, has made it helpful to approach many clinical disorders by casting them in the form of models (quantitative hypotheses) that can be tested experimentally; in this way the power of the scientific method can be applied. This is especially the case in systems neuroscience, in which the experimental testing of mathematical models has proven an effective approach to understanding a range of clinical problems. Here, we focus on disorders of the neural control of eye movements, which offer many advantages to clinician scientists, providing examples of how thorny clinical mysteries became much clearer once they were formulated as models, and tested experimentally. Such an approach inevitably raises new questions and experimental tests and may suggest novel therapies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProgress in Brain Research
EditorsStefano Ramat, Aasef G. Shaikh
PublisherElsevier B.V.
Pages19-26
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9780444642332
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Publication series

NameProgress in Brain Research
Volume248
ISSN (Print)0079-6123
ISSN (Electronic)1875-7855

Keywords

  • Cerebellum
  • Feedback
  • Hypotheses
  • Inferior olivary nucleus
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Oculopalatal tremor
  • Open-loop
  • Smooth pursuit
  • The scientific method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mathematical models: An extension of the clinician's mind'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this