Mass casualty respiratory failure

Elizabeth L. Daugherty, Richard Branson, Lewis Rubinson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic of 2002-2003, recent natural catastrophes, burgeoning concerns regarding intentional catastrophes, and the looming threat of an influenza pandemic have focused attention on large-scale, survivable respiratory failure. In this article, we review appropriate medical equipment, treatment space, and strategies to augment health professional staff in response to a massive increase in need for sustained critical care. RECENT FINDINGS: There is insufficient modern healthcare experience with mass casualty respiratory failure to develop evidence-based preparedness efforts. For this reason, initial efforts to augment critical care capability in response to disasters have relied on extrapolation from the routine critical care knowledge base, military medicine, critical care transport, and expert opinion. We review recently published documents on augmenting supplies of positive pressure ventilation equipment, ongoing projects for increasing health professional staff, and infection control issues during epidemics. SUMMARY: Mass casualty respiratory failure remains a largely unstudied field, but we believe informed decisions about equipment stockpiling and use, the development of creative operational concepts to increase staffing, and the careful implementation of rational infection control practices can lay a foundation for an appropriate response until additional data become available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-56
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent opinion in critical care
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2007

Keywords

  • Bioterrorism
  • Critical care medicine
  • Disaster medicine
  • Mass casualty medical care
  • Surge capacity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mass casualty respiratory failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this