Marketplace subsidies: Changing the 'family glitch' reduces family health spending but increases government costs

Matthew Buettgens, Lisa Dubay, Genevieve M. Kenney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Under the Affordable Care Act, if one family member has an employer offer of single coverage deemed to be affordable-that is, costing less than 9.66 percent of family income in 2016-then all family members are ineligible for tax credits for Marketplace coverage, even if the cost of providing coverage to the whole family is greater than 9.66 percent of income. More than six million people live in such families and as a result are ineligible for premium tax credits. These families face premiums that can amount to 15.8 percent of income, or 12.0 percent after the tax advantages of employer-sponsored health coverage are factored in. We modeled the potential impact of changing the affordability test to take into account the cost of family coverage. Doing so would reduce spending on premiums from 12.0 percent to 6.3 percent of income, significantly alleviating financial burdens, but would generate little additional coverage. We estimated the additional costs to the federal government for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions to be between $3.7 billion and $6.5 billion in 2016.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1167-1175
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume35
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Family Health
Costs and Cost Analysis
Taxes
Cost Sharing
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Federal Government
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Marketplace subsidies : Changing the 'family glitch' reduces family health spending but increases government costs. / Buettgens, Matthew; Dubay, Lisa; Kenney, Genevieve M.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 35, No. 7, 2016, p. 1167-1175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buettgens, Matthew ; Dubay, Lisa ; Kenney, Genevieve M. / Marketplace subsidies : Changing the 'family glitch' reduces family health spending but increases government costs. In: Health Affairs. 2016 ; Vol. 35, No. 7. pp. 1167-1175.
@article{26842bd5ed6b419298637fe6bb24718a,
title = "Marketplace subsidies: Changing the 'family glitch' reduces family health spending but increases government costs",
abstract = "Under the Affordable Care Act, if one family member has an employer offer of single coverage deemed to be affordable-that is, costing less than 9.66 percent of family income in 2016-then all family members are ineligible for tax credits for Marketplace coverage, even if the cost of providing coverage to the whole family is greater than 9.66 percent of income. More than six million people live in such families and as a result are ineligible for premium tax credits. These families face premiums that can amount to 15.8 percent of income, or 12.0 percent after the tax advantages of employer-sponsored health coverage are factored in. We modeled the potential impact of changing the affordability test to take into account the cost of family coverage. Doing so would reduce spending on premiums from 12.0 percent to 6.3 percent of income, significantly alleviating financial burdens, but would generate little additional coverage. We estimated the additional costs to the federal government for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions to be between $3.7 billion and $6.5 billion in 2016.",
author = "Matthew Buettgens and Lisa Dubay and Kenney, {Genevieve M.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1491",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1167--1175",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marketplace subsidies

T2 - Changing the 'family glitch' reduces family health spending but increases government costs

AU - Buettgens, Matthew

AU - Dubay, Lisa

AU - Kenney, Genevieve M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Under the Affordable Care Act, if one family member has an employer offer of single coverage deemed to be affordable-that is, costing less than 9.66 percent of family income in 2016-then all family members are ineligible for tax credits for Marketplace coverage, even if the cost of providing coverage to the whole family is greater than 9.66 percent of income. More than six million people live in such families and as a result are ineligible for premium tax credits. These families face premiums that can amount to 15.8 percent of income, or 12.0 percent after the tax advantages of employer-sponsored health coverage are factored in. We modeled the potential impact of changing the affordability test to take into account the cost of family coverage. Doing so would reduce spending on premiums from 12.0 percent to 6.3 percent of income, significantly alleviating financial burdens, but would generate little additional coverage. We estimated the additional costs to the federal government for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions to be between $3.7 billion and $6.5 billion in 2016.

AB - Under the Affordable Care Act, if one family member has an employer offer of single coverage deemed to be affordable-that is, costing less than 9.66 percent of family income in 2016-then all family members are ineligible for tax credits for Marketplace coverage, even if the cost of providing coverage to the whole family is greater than 9.66 percent of income. More than six million people live in such families and as a result are ineligible for premium tax credits. These families face premiums that can amount to 15.8 percent of income, or 12.0 percent after the tax advantages of employer-sponsored health coverage are factored in. We modeled the potential impact of changing the affordability test to take into account the cost of family coverage. Doing so would reduce spending on premiums from 12.0 percent to 6.3 percent of income, significantly alleviating financial burdens, but would generate little additional coverage. We estimated the additional costs to the federal government for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions to be between $3.7 billion and $6.5 billion in 2016.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980340208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980340208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1491

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1491

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84980340208

VL - 35

SP - 1167

EP - 1175

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 7

ER -