Mapping the human genome: An assessment of media coverage and public reaction

Ellen S. Tambor; Barbara A. Bernhardt; Joann Rodgers; Neil A. Holtzman; Gail Geller

doi:10.1097/00125817-200201000-00006

Mapping the human genome: An assessment of media coverage and public reaction

Ellen S. Tambor, Barbara A. Bernhardt, Joann Rodgers, Neil A. Holtzman, Gail Geller

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To assess public reactions to the June 26, 2000, announcement that scientists had nearly finished mapping the human genome. Methods: We conducted a random-digit telephone survey of 407 Maryland residents as well as a content analysis of 55 relevant media reports. Results: African Americans were more likely than Caucasians to report a negative reaction (P < 0.001) to the genome announcement. Overall, privacy/discrimination (16%) and human cloning (14%) were the most commonly mentioned concerns regarding the impact of the genome mapping. Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for continued public discourse, including through the media, to address concerns regarding the Human Genome Project.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	31-36
Number of pages	6
Journal	Genetics in Medicine
Volume	4
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-200201000-00006
State	Published - Jan 2002

Keywords

Genetic education
Genetics
Human Genome Project
Mass media
Minority opinions
Public opinion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Genetics(clinical)

Access to Document

10.1097/00125817-200201000-00006

Cite this

@article{3994ee01dcf0453bbf41a5c766ab9fcd,

title = "Mapping the human genome: An assessment of media coverage and public reaction",

abstract = "Purpose: To assess public reactions to the June 26, 2000, announcement that scientists had nearly finished mapping the human genome. Methods: We conducted a random-digit telephone survey of 407 Maryland residents as well as a content analysis of 55 relevant media reports. Results: African Americans were more likely than Caucasians to report a negative reaction (P < 0.001) to the genome announcement. Overall, privacy/discrimination (16%) and human cloning (14%) were the most commonly mentioned concerns regarding the impact of the genome mapping. Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for continued public discourse, including through the media, to address concerns regarding the Human Genome Project.",

keywords = "Genetic education, Genetics, Human Genome Project, Mass media, Minority opinions, Public opinion",

author = "Tambor, {Ellen S.} and Bernhardt, {Barbara A.} and Joann Rodgers and Holtzman, {Neil A.} and Gail Geller",

year = "2002",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1097/00125817-200201000-00006",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "4",

pages = "31--36",

journal = "Genetics in Medicine",

issn = "1098-3600",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping the human genome

T2 - An assessment of media coverage and public reaction

AU - Tambor, Ellen S.

AU - Bernhardt, Barbara A.

AU - Rodgers, Joann

AU - Holtzman, Neil A.

AU - Geller, Gail

PY - 2002/1

Y1 - 2002/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess public reactions to the June 26, 2000, announcement that scientists had nearly finished mapping the human genome. Methods: We conducted a random-digit telephone survey of 407 Maryland residents as well as a content analysis of 55 relevant media reports. Results: African Americans were more likely than Caucasians to report a negative reaction (P < 0.001) to the genome announcement. Overall, privacy/discrimination (16%) and human cloning (14%) were the most commonly mentioned concerns regarding the impact of the genome mapping. Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for continued public discourse, including through the media, to address concerns regarding the Human Genome Project.

AB - Purpose: To assess public reactions to the June 26, 2000, announcement that scientists had nearly finished mapping the human genome. Methods: We conducted a random-digit telephone survey of 407 Maryland residents as well as a content analysis of 55 relevant media reports. Results: African Americans were more likely than Caucasians to report a negative reaction (P < 0.001) to the genome announcement. Overall, privacy/discrimination (16%) and human cloning (14%) were the most commonly mentioned concerns regarding the impact of the genome mapping. Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for continued public discourse, including through the media, to address concerns regarding the Human Genome Project.

KW - Genetic education

KW - Genetics

KW - Human Genome Project

KW - Mass media

KW - Minority opinions

KW - Public opinion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036358295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036358295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00125817-200201000-00006

DO - 10.1097/00125817-200201000-00006

M3 - Review article

C2 - 11839956

AN - SCOPUS:0036358295

SN - 1098-3600

VL - 4

SP - 31

EP - 36

JO - Genetics in Medicine

JF - Genetics in Medicine

IS - 1

ER -

Mapping the human genome: An assessment of media coverage and public reaction

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this