Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States: The need for sanitary reform

Jay P. Graham, Keeve Nachman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Confined food-animal operations in the United States produce more than 40 times the amount of waste than human biosolids generated from US wastewater treatment plants. Unlike biosolids, which must meet regulatory standards for pathogen levels, vector attraction reduction and metal content, no treatment is required of waste from animal agriculture. This omission is of concern based on dramatic changes in livestock production over the past 50 years, which have resulted in large increases in animal waste and a high degree of geographic concentration of waste associated with the regional growth of industrial food-animal production. Regulatory measures have not kept pace with these changes. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) review trends that affect food-animal waste production in the United States, 2) assess risks associated with food-animal wastes, 3) contrast food-animal waste management practices to management practices for biosolids and 4) make recommendations based on existing and potential policy options to improve management of food-animal waste.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)646-670
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Water and Health
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

food
animal
biosolid
Food
management practice
livestock farming
Waste Management
waste management
need
Practice Management
Livestock
pathogen
Waste Water
Agriculture
animal waste
agriculture
Metals
metal
Growth

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Food animal
  • Livestock
  • Manure
  • Policy
  • Public health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States : The need for sanitary reform. / Graham, Jay P.; Nachman, Keeve.

In: Journal of Water and Health, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2010, p. 646-670.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c59b2a5b01984cd2be4dd65e13e74a29,
title = "Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States: The need for sanitary reform",
abstract = "Confined food-animal operations in the United States produce more than 40 times the amount of waste than human biosolids generated from US wastewater treatment plants. Unlike biosolids, which must meet regulatory standards for pathogen levels, vector attraction reduction and metal content, no treatment is required of waste from animal agriculture. This omission is of concern based on dramatic changes in livestock production over the past 50 years, which have resulted in large increases in animal waste and a high degree of geographic concentration of waste associated with the regional growth of industrial food-animal production. Regulatory measures have not kept pace with these changes. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) review trends that affect food-animal waste production in the United States, 2) assess risks associated with food-animal wastes, 3) contrast food-animal waste management practices to management practices for biosolids and 4) make recommendations based on existing and potential policy options to improve management of food-animal waste.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Food animal, Livestock, Manure, Policy, Public health",
author = "Graham, {Jay P.} and Keeve Nachman",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.2166/wh.2010.075",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "646--670",
journal = "Journal of Water and Health",
issn = "1477-8920",
publisher = "IWA Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States

T2 - The need for sanitary reform

AU - Graham, Jay P.

AU - Nachman, Keeve

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Confined food-animal operations in the United States produce more than 40 times the amount of waste than human biosolids generated from US wastewater treatment plants. Unlike biosolids, which must meet regulatory standards for pathogen levels, vector attraction reduction and metal content, no treatment is required of waste from animal agriculture. This omission is of concern based on dramatic changes in livestock production over the past 50 years, which have resulted in large increases in animal waste and a high degree of geographic concentration of waste associated with the regional growth of industrial food-animal production. Regulatory measures have not kept pace with these changes. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) review trends that affect food-animal waste production in the United States, 2) assess risks associated with food-animal wastes, 3) contrast food-animal waste management practices to management practices for biosolids and 4) make recommendations based on existing and potential policy options to improve management of food-animal waste.

AB - Confined food-animal operations in the United States produce more than 40 times the amount of waste than human biosolids generated from US wastewater treatment plants. Unlike biosolids, which must meet regulatory standards for pathogen levels, vector attraction reduction and metal content, no treatment is required of waste from animal agriculture. This omission is of concern based on dramatic changes in livestock production over the past 50 years, which have resulted in large increases in animal waste and a high degree of geographic concentration of waste associated with the regional growth of industrial food-animal production. Regulatory measures have not kept pace with these changes. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) review trends that affect food-animal waste production in the United States, 2) assess risks associated with food-animal wastes, 3) contrast food-animal waste management practices to management practices for biosolids and 4) make recommendations based on existing and potential policy options to improve management of food-animal waste.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Food animal

KW - Livestock

KW - Manure

KW - Policy

KW - Public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650832459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650832459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2166/wh.2010.075

DO - 10.2166/wh.2010.075

M3 - Article

C2 - 20705978

AN - SCOPUS:78650832459

VL - 8

SP - 646

EP - 670

JO - Journal of Water and Health

JF - Journal of Water and Health

SN - 1477-8920

IS - 4

ER -