Management of stone disease in pregnancy

Michelle J. Semins, Brian Matlaga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Nephrolithiasis is a not infrequent complication of pregnancy. The occurrence of a stone event in a pregnant woman is a complex situation. Therefore, a clear understanding of the management options available and their relative advantages and disadvantages for this unique population is important. Recent Findings: When initial, conservative measures have failed in the treatment of a pregnant woman suffering from an acute stone event, management options have historically been of a temporizing nature: generally, either ureteral stent placement or nephrostomy drainage. However, with recent advances in surgical technology and surgeon technique, a more definitive approach to these patients has become more widely adopted. Indeed, several recent case series have reported the complication rate for ureteroscopy during pregnancy to be low. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of case series of ureteroscopy during pregnancy suggests definitive endoscopic treatment is well tolerated in this patient population. Summary: In a pregnant patient without contraindications to ureteroscopy, the definitive endoscopic treatment of an acute stone event is a reasonable management strategy, should conservative measures fail. Although further investigation with randomized control trials is ideally needed to confirm these results, at present, the published case series and meta-analysis confirm the safety of ureteroscopy in pregnant patients in the appropriate setting. A multidisciplinary approach is key to the successful management of this complex patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-177
Number of pages4
JournalCurrent Opinion in Urology
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Ureteroscopy
Disease Management
Pregnancy
Meta-Analysis
Pregnant Women
Population
Nephrolithiasis
Pregnancy Complications
Stents
Drainage
Therapeutics
Technology
Safety

Keywords

  • Calculi
  • Kidney
  • Nephrostomy
  • Pregnancy
  • Ureteroscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Management of stone disease in pregnancy. / Semins, Michelle J.; Matlaga, Brian.

In: Current Opinion in Urology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 03.2010, p. 174-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Semins, Michelle J. ; Matlaga, Brian. / Management of stone disease in pregnancy. In: Current Opinion in Urology. 2010 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 174-177.
@article{8d5878cc7b7349b2999abeee519124d4,
title = "Management of stone disease in pregnancy",
abstract = "Purpose of Review: Nephrolithiasis is a not infrequent complication of pregnancy. The occurrence of a stone event in a pregnant woman is a complex situation. Therefore, a clear understanding of the management options available and their relative advantages and disadvantages for this unique population is important. Recent Findings: When initial, conservative measures have failed in the treatment of a pregnant woman suffering from an acute stone event, management options have historically been of a temporizing nature: generally, either ureteral stent placement or nephrostomy drainage. However, with recent advances in surgical technology and surgeon technique, a more definitive approach to these patients has become more widely adopted. Indeed, several recent case series have reported the complication rate for ureteroscopy during pregnancy to be low. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of case series of ureteroscopy during pregnancy suggests definitive endoscopic treatment is well tolerated in this patient population. Summary: In a pregnant patient without contraindications to ureteroscopy, the definitive endoscopic treatment of an acute stone event is a reasonable management strategy, should conservative measures fail. Although further investigation with randomized control trials is ideally needed to confirm these results, at present, the published case series and meta-analysis confirm the safety of ureteroscopy in pregnant patients in the appropriate setting. A multidisciplinary approach is key to the successful management of this complex patient population.",
keywords = "Calculi, Kidney, Nephrostomy, Pregnancy, Ureteroscopy",
author = "Semins, {Michelle J.} and Brian Matlaga",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283353a4b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "174--177",
journal = "Current Opinion in Urology",
issn = "0963-0643",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of stone disease in pregnancy

AU - Semins, Michelle J.

AU - Matlaga, Brian

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Purpose of Review: Nephrolithiasis is a not infrequent complication of pregnancy. The occurrence of a stone event in a pregnant woman is a complex situation. Therefore, a clear understanding of the management options available and their relative advantages and disadvantages for this unique population is important. Recent Findings: When initial, conservative measures have failed in the treatment of a pregnant woman suffering from an acute stone event, management options have historically been of a temporizing nature: generally, either ureteral stent placement or nephrostomy drainage. However, with recent advances in surgical technology and surgeon technique, a more definitive approach to these patients has become more widely adopted. Indeed, several recent case series have reported the complication rate for ureteroscopy during pregnancy to be low. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of case series of ureteroscopy during pregnancy suggests definitive endoscopic treatment is well tolerated in this patient population. Summary: In a pregnant patient without contraindications to ureteroscopy, the definitive endoscopic treatment of an acute stone event is a reasonable management strategy, should conservative measures fail. Although further investigation with randomized control trials is ideally needed to confirm these results, at present, the published case series and meta-analysis confirm the safety of ureteroscopy in pregnant patients in the appropriate setting. A multidisciplinary approach is key to the successful management of this complex patient population.

AB - Purpose of Review: Nephrolithiasis is a not infrequent complication of pregnancy. The occurrence of a stone event in a pregnant woman is a complex situation. Therefore, a clear understanding of the management options available and their relative advantages and disadvantages for this unique population is important. Recent Findings: When initial, conservative measures have failed in the treatment of a pregnant woman suffering from an acute stone event, management options have historically been of a temporizing nature: generally, either ureteral stent placement or nephrostomy drainage. However, with recent advances in surgical technology and surgeon technique, a more definitive approach to these patients has become more widely adopted. Indeed, several recent case series have reported the complication rate for ureteroscopy during pregnancy to be low. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of case series of ureteroscopy during pregnancy suggests definitive endoscopic treatment is well tolerated in this patient population. Summary: In a pregnant patient without contraindications to ureteroscopy, the definitive endoscopic treatment of an acute stone event is a reasonable management strategy, should conservative measures fail. Although further investigation with randomized control trials is ideally needed to confirm these results, at present, the published case series and meta-analysis confirm the safety of ureteroscopy in pregnant patients in the appropriate setting. A multidisciplinary approach is key to the successful management of this complex patient population.

KW - Calculi

KW - Kidney

KW - Nephrostomy

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Ureteroscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76749094062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76749094062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283353a4b

DO - 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283353a4b

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 174

EP - 177

JO - Current Opinion in Urology

JF - Current Opinion in Urology

SN - 0963-0643

IS - 2

ER -