Management of difficult airway among patients with oropharyngeal angioedema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The objective of our study was to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary difficult airway response team (DART), a quality improvement program, in the management of patients with difficult airway associated with oropharyngeal angioedema patients. Methods: Individual retrospective cohort study. Retrospective review of patient charts from July 2003 to June 2008 (pre-DART) and retrospective review of prospectively collected data from July 2008 to June 2013 (post-DART). Patients with angioedema were identified using International Classification of Disease codes 995.1 and 277.6. Patients were included in the study if an otolaryngologist was consulted for airway management. Patients were excluded if they had a history of angioedema but no active issues. Patient characteristics, airway evaluation, and interventions (intubation/surgical airway) were compared between the pre-DART and post-DART cohort. Results: The DART team attended to 27 patients with advanced oropharyngeal angioedema. Response time averaged 3.36 minutes. Preintubation fiberoptic airway evaluations were performed in 81% of the post-DART cohort and 56% of the pre-DART cohort. The incidence of patients requiring intubation was higher in the post-DART cohort (18 out of 27 [67%]) than the pre-DART (14 out of 36 [39%]) cohort. One emergency cricothyroidotomy was performed in each of the post-DART and pre-DART cohorts. Conclusion: Angioedema of the larynx is a predictor of intubation or cricothyroidotomy. Fiberoptic-guided intubation is primarily used for establishing airway in angioedema patients. A multidisciplinary standardized approach such as the DART program offers adequate time and resources for airway evaluation prior to intervention and allows fewer number of attempts to secure an airway. Level of Evidence: 3. Laryngoscope, 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLaryngoscope
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Angioedema
Airway Management
Intubation
Laryngoscopes
International Classification of Diseases
Larynx
Quality Improvement
Reaction Time
Emergencies
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • airway securement techniques
  • clinical outcomes
  • difficult airway
  • multidisciplinary
  • Oropharyngeal angioedema

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Management of difficult airway among patients with oropharyngeal angioedema. / Pandian, Vinciya; Zhen, Gooi; Stanley, Stanola; Oldsman, Marco; Haut, Elliott; Mark, Lynette J; Miller, Christina; Hillel, Alexander Tell.

In: Laryngoscope, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dbd5fd9af35b4d62803f64f90b7b52b8,
title = "Management of difficult airway among patients with oropharyngeal angioedema",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of our study was to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary difficult airway response team (DART), a quality improvement program, in the management of patients with difficult airway associated with oropharyngeal angioedema patients. Methods: Individual retrospective cohort study. Retrospective review of patient charts from July 2003 to June 2008 (pre-DART) and retrospective review of prospectively collected data from July 2008 to June 2013 (post-DART). Patients with angioedema were identified using International Classification of Disease codes 995.1 and 277.6. Patients were included in the study if an otolaryngologist was consulted for airway management. Patients were excluded if they had a history of angioedema but no active issues. Patient characteristics, airway evaluation, and interventions (intubation/surgical airway) were compared between the pre-DART and post-DART cohort. Results: The DART team attended to 27 patients with advanced oropharyngeal angioedema. Response time averaged 3.36 minutes. Preintubation fiberoptic airway evaluations were performed in 81{\%} of the post-DART cohort and 56{\%} of the pre-DART cohort. The incidence of patients requiring intubation was higher in the post-DART cohort (18 out of 27 [67{\%}]) than the pre-DART (14 out of 36 [39{\%}]) cohort. One emergency cricothyroidotomy was performed in each of the post-DART and pre-DART cohorts. Conclusion: Angioedema of the larynx is a predictor of intubation or cricothyroidotomy. Fiberoptic-guided intubation is primarily used for establishing airway in angioedema patients. A multidisciplinary standardized approach such as the DART program offers adequate time and resources for airway evaluation prior to intervention and allows fewer number of attempts to secure an airway. Level of Evidence: 3. Laryngoscope, 2018.",
keywords = "airway securement techniques, clinical outcomes, difficult airway, multidisciplinary, Oropharyngeal angioedema",
author = "Vinciya Pandian and Gooi Zhen and Stanola Stanley and Marco Oldsman and Elliott Haut and Mark, {Lynette J} and Christina Miller and Hillel, {Alexander Tell}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.27622",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of difficult airway among patients with oropharyngeal angioedema

AU - Pandian, Vinciya

AU - Zhen, Gooi

AU - Stanley, Stanola

AU - Oldsman, Marco

AU - Haut, Elliott

AU - Mark, Lynette J

AU - Miller, Christina

AU - Hillel, Alexander Tell

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: The objective of our study was to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary difficult airway response team (DART), a quality improvement program, in the management of patients with difficult airway associated with oropharyngeal angioedema patients. Methods: Individual retrospective cohort study. Retrospective review of patient charts from July 2003 to June 2008 (pre-DART) and retrospective review of prospectively collected data from July 2008 to June 2013 (post-DART). Patients with angioedema were identified using International Classification of Disease codes 995.1 and 277.6. Patients were included in the study if an otolaryngologist was consulted for airway management. Patients were excluded if they had a history of angioedema but no active issues. Patient characteristics, airway evaluation, and interventions (intubation/surgical airway) were compared between the pre-DART and post-DART cohort. Results: The DART team attended to 27 patients with advanced oropharyngeal angioedema. Response time averaged 3.36 minutes. Preintubation fiberoptic airway evaluations were performed in 81% of the post-DART cohort and 56% of the pre-DART cohort. The incidence of patients requiring intubation was higher in the post-DART cohort (18 out of 27 [67%]) than the pre-DART (14 out of 36 [39%]) cohort. One emergency cricothyroidotomy was performed in each of the post-DART and pre-DART cohorts. Conclusion: Angioedema of the larynx is a predictor of intubation or cricothyroidotomy. Fiberoptic-guided intubation is primarily used for establishing airway in angioedema patients. A multidisciplinary standardized approach such as the DART program offers adequate time and resources for airway evaluation prior to intervention and allows fewer number of attempts to secure an airway. Level of Evidence: 3. Laryngoscope, 2018.

AB - Objective: The objective of our study was to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary difficult airway response team (DART), a quality improvement program, in the management of patients with difficult airway associated with oropharyngeal angioedema patients. Methods: Individual retrospective cohort study. Retrospective review of patient charts from July 2003 to June 2008 (pre-DART) and retrospective review of prospectively collected data from July 2008 to June 2013 (post-DART). Patients with angioedema were identified using International Classification of Disease codes 995.1 and 277.6. Patients were included in the study if an otolaryngologist was consulted for airway management. Patients were excluded if they had a history of angioedema but no active issues. Patient characteristics, airway evaluation, and interventions (intubation/surgical airway) were compared between the pre-DART and post-DART cohort. Results: The DART team attended to 27 patients with advanced oropharyngeal angioedema. Response time averaged 3.36 minutes. Preintubation fiberoptic airway evaluations were performed in 81% of the post-DART cohort and 56% of the pre-DART cohort. The incidence of patients requiring intubation was higher in the post-DART cohort (18 out of 27 [67%]) than the pre-DART (14 out of 36 [39%]) cohort. One emergency cricothyroidotomy was performed in each of the post-DART and pre-DART cohorts. Conclusion: Angioedema of the larynx is a predictor of intubation or cricothyroidotomy. Fiberoptic-guided intubation is primarily used for establishing airway in angioedema patients. A multidisciplinary standardized approach such as the DART program offers adequate time and resources for airway evaluation prior to intervention and allows fewer number of attempts to secure an airway. Level of Evidence: 3. Laryngoscope, 2018.

KW - airway securement techniques

KW - clinical outcomes

KW - difficult airway

KW - multidisciplinary

KW - Oropharyngeal angioedema

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059071316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059071316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.27622

DO - 10.1002/lary.27622

M3 - Article

C2 - 30588625

AN - SCOPUS:85059071316

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

ER -