Managed care and its impact on American urology

H. Logan Holtgrewe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

America's health care is undergoing a revolution. A previous private, fee-for-service, delivery system chiefly centered around hospital specialty care is rapidly being replaced by a commercialized system of managed care, controlled by businessmen whose prime motive is profit. Increasing emphasis of these managed care organizations is upon primary physicians who function as gatekeepers. While this new commercialized method of health care has been attended with reductions in the previous omnipresent health care inflation our country has experienced for the past several decades, its impact on quality of care and patient choice of physician remain a great concern. Especially vulnerable in this new system are our nation's academic centers, which, burdened with responsibility for education and research, are at a disadvantage in the competitive cost-based bidding for managed care contracts. Urology work force issues and the number of urologists in our nation remain another concern for urologists as they compete for access to patients in this new highly competitive environment. In a 1995 survey of a cohort of urologists in seven states, the respondents reported 35.8% of gross income came from managed care contracts, 86% reported the need for preservice approval for many diagnostic and therapeutic undertakings, 87% reported an inability to refer complex cases outside the Managed Care Organization (MCO) network, and 23% reported they were required to retain patients for treatment who they would have otherwise referred to a more qualified urologist. The majority of American urologists are reporting dropping gross revenues and increasing overhead in their dealings with managed care contracts. The advent of managed care is being attended with dropping gross revenues, increasing overhead costs and interference with the practice patterns of American urologists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-35
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume51
Issue number5 SUPPL. A
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1998

Fingerprint

Urology
Managed Care Programs
Contracts
Delivery of Health Care
Organizations
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Fee-for-Service Plans
Quality of Health Care
Economic Inflation
Urologists
Education
Therapeutics
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Managed care and its impact on American urology. / Holtgrewe, H. Logan.

In: Urology, Vol. 51, No. 5 SUPPL. A, 05.1998, p. 31-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holtgrewe, H. Logan. / Managed care and its impact on American urology. In: Urology. 1998 ; Vol. 51, No. 5 SUPPL. A. pp. 31-35.
@article{29cc51d4b2dc42d681ce74576aedf6f4,
title = "Managed care and its impact on American urology",
abstract = "America's health care is undergoing a revolution. A previous private, fee-for-service, delivery system chiefly centered around hospital specialty care is rapidly being replaced by a commercialized system of managed care, controlled by businessmen whose prime motive is profit. Increasing emphasis of these managed care organizations is upon primary physicians who function as gatekeepers. While this new commercialized method of health care has been attended with reductions in the previous omnipresent health care inflation our country has experienced for the past several decades, its impact on quality of care and patient choice of physician remain a great concern. Especially vulnerable in this new system are our nation's academic centers, which, burdened with responsibility for education and research, are at a disadvantage in the competitive cost-based bidding for managed care contracts. Urology work force issues and the number of urologists in our nation remain another concern for urologists as they compete for access to patients in this new highly competitive environment. In a 1995 survey of a cohort of urologists in seven states, the respondents reported 35.8{\%} of gross income came from managed care contracts, 86{\%} reported the need for preservice approval for many diagnostic and therapeutic undertakings, 87{\%} reported an inability to refer complex cases outside the Managed Care Organization (MCO) network, and 23{\%} reported they were required to retain patients for treatment who they would have otherwise referred to a more qualified urologist. The majority of American urologists are reporting dropping gross revenues and increasing overhead in their dealings with managed care contracts. The advent of managed care is being attended with dropping gross revenues, increasing overhead costs and interference with the practice patterns of American urologists.",
author = "Holtgrewe, {H. Logan}",
year = "1998",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00068-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "31--35",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5 SUPPL. A",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managed care and its impact on American urology

AU - Holtgrewe, H. Logan

PY - 1998/5

Y1 - 1998/5

N2 - America's health care is undergoing a revolution. A previous private, fee-for-service, delivery system chiefly centered around hospital specialty care is rapidly being replaced by a commercialized system of managed care, controlled by businessmen whose prime motive is profit. Increasing emphasis of these managed care organizations is upon primary physicians who function as gatekeepers. While this new commercialized method of health care has been attended with reductions in the previous omnipresent health care inflation our country has experienced for the past several decades, its impact on quality of care and patient choice of physician remain a great concern. Especially vulnerable in this new system are our nation's academic centers, which, burdened with responsibility for education and research, are at a disadvantage in the competitive cost-based bidding for managed care contracts. Urology work force issues and the number of urologists in our nation remain another concern for urologists as they compete for access to patients in this new highly competitive environment. In a 1995 survey of a cohort of urologists in seven states, the respondents reported 35.8% of gross income came from managed care contracts, 86% reported the need for preservice approval for many diagnostic and therapeutic undertakings, 87% reported an inability to refer complex cases outside the Managed Care Organization (MCO) network, and 23% reported they were required to retain patients for treatment who they would have otherwise referred to a more qualified urologist. The majority of American urologists are reporting dropping gross revenues and increasing overhead in their dealings with managed care contracts. The advent of managed care is being attended with dropping gross revenues, increasing overhead costs and interference with the practice patterns of American urologists.

AB - America's health care is undergoing a revolution. A previous private, fee-for-service, delivery system chiefly centered around hospital specialty care is rapidly being replaced by a commercialized system of managed care, controlled by businessmen whose prime motive is profit. Increasing emphasis of these managed care organizations is upon primary physicians who function as gatekeepers. While this new commercialized method of health care has been attended with reductions in the previous omnipresent health care inflation our country has experienced for the past several decades, its impact on quality of care and patient choice of physician remain a great concern. Especially vulnerable in this new system are our nation's academic centers, which, burdened with responsibility for education and research, are at a disadvantage in the competitive cost-based bidding for managed care contracts. Urology work force issues and the number of urologists in our nation remain another concern for urologists as they compete for access to patients in this new highly competitive environment. In a 1995 survey of a cohort of urologists in seven states, the respondents reported 35.8% of gross income came from managed care contracts, 86% reported the need for preservice approval for many diagnostic and therapeutic undertakings, 87% reported an inability to refer complex cases outside the Managed Care Organization (MCO) network, and 23% reported they were required to retain patients for treatment who they would have otherwise referred to a more qualified urologist. The majority of American urologists are reporting dropping gross revenues and increasing overhead in their dealings with managed care contracts. The advent of managed care is being attended with dropping gross revenues, increasing overhead costs and interference with the practice patterns of American urologists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031805991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031805991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00068-5

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00068-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 9610555

AN - SCOPUS:0031805991

VL - 51

SP - 31

EP - 35

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 5 SUPPL. A

ER -