Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Differentiate the Histology of Testicular Masses: A Systematic Review of Studies With Pathologic Confirmation

Hiten D. Patel, Margarita Ramos, Mohit Gupta, Joseph G. Cheaib, Ritu Sharma, Allen Zhang, Eric B. Bass, Phillip M. Pierorazio

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate scrotal pathology. However, differentiating malignant and benign testicular tumors is not always possible, and there is interest in evaluating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a potential adjunct for diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review and found 9 studies related to MRI diagnosis of testicular masses. A total of 220 testicular masses (217 patients) undergoing MRI were identified. Notable findings include malignant masses having a lower apparent diffusion coefficient compared to benign masses (3 of 4 studies) and that quantitative enhancement patterns could differentiate Leydig cell tumors from germ cell tumors in 2 studies. While there were some distinct qualitative characterizations of testicular masses on MRI, further research is needed to identify appropriate clinical contexts for use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalUrology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Histology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Leydig Cell Tumor
Germ Cell and Embryonal Neoplasms
Testicular Neoplasms
Ultrasonography
Pathology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Differentiate the Histology of Testicular Masses : A Systematic Review of Studies With Pathologic Confirmation. / Patel, Hiten D.; Ramos, Margarita; Gupta, Mohit; Cheaib, Joseph G.; Sharma, Ritu; Zhang, Allen; Bass, Eric B.; Pierorazio, Phillip M.

In: Urology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e39eadd94bb64b5085f5a9c870790f84,
title = "Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Differentiate the Histology of Testicular Masses: A Systematic Review of Studies With Pathologic Confirmation",
abstract = "Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate scrotal pathology. However, differentiating malignant and benign testicular tumors is not always possible, and there is interest in evaluating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a potential adjunct for diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review and found 9 studies related to MRI diagnosis of testicular masses. A total of 220 testicular masses (217 patients) undergoing MRI were identified. Notable findings include malignant masses having a lower apparent diffusion coefficient compared to benign masses (3 of 4 studies) and that quantitative enhancement patterns could differentiate Leydig cell tumors from germ cell tumors in 2 studies. While there were some distinct qualitative characterizations of testicular masses on MRI, further research is needed to identify appropriate clinical contexts for use.",
author = "Patel, {Hiten D.} and Margarita Ramos and Mohit Gupta and Cheaib, {Joseph G.} and Ritu Sharma and Allen Zhang and Bass, {Eric B.} and Pierorazio, {Phillip M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2019.09.025",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Differentiate the Histology of Testicular Masses

T2 - A Systematic Review of Studies With Pathologic Confirmation

AU - Patel, Hiten D.

AU - Ramos, Margarita

AU - Gupta, Mohit

AU - Cheaib, Joseph G.

AU - Sharma, Ritu

AU - Zhang, Allen

AU - Bass, Eric B.

AU - Pierorazio, Phillip M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate scrotal pathology. However, differentiating malignant and benign testicular tumors is not always possible, and there is interest in evaluating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a potential adjunct for diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review and found 9 studies related to MRI diagnosis of testicular masses. A total of 220 testicular masses (217 patients) undergoing MRI were identified. Notable findings include malignant masses having a lower apparent diffusion coefficient compared to benign masses (3 of 4 studies) and that quantitative enhancement patterns could differentiate Leydig cell tumors from germ cell tumors in 2 studies. While there were some distinct qualitative characterizations of testicular masses on MRI, further research is needed to identify appropriate clinical contexts for use.

AB - Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate scrotal pathology. However, differentiating malignant and benign testicular tumors is not always possible, and there is interest in evaluating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a potential adjunct for diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review and found 9 studies related to MRI diagnosis of testicular masses. A total of 220 testicular masses (217 patients) undergoing MRI were identified. Notable findings include malignant masses having a lower apparent diffusion coefficient compared to benign masses (3 of 4 studies) and that quantitative enhancement patterns could differentiate Leydig cell tumors from germ cell tumors in 2 studies. While there were some distinct qualitative characterizations of testicular masses on MRI, further research is needed to identify appropriate clinical contexts for use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074685165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074685165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2019.09.025

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2019.09.025

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31585196

AN - SCOPUS:85074685165

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

ER -