TY - JOUR
T1 - Lymph node harvest after proctectomy for invasive rectal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy
T2 - Does the same standard apply?
AU - Wang, Hao
AU - Safar, Bashar
AU - Wexner, Steven
AU - Zhao, RongHua
AU - Cruz-Correa, Marcia
AU - Berho, Mariana
PY - 2009/4
Y1 - 2009/4
N2 - PURPOSE: Recent reports indicate that neoadjuvant therapy significantly reduces the lymph node harvest of rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to interpret the lymph node harvest in this setting based on the primary tumor response. METHODS: All patients undergoing proctectomy were included. Three variables were used as indicators of primary tumor response: ypT stage, tumor size, and tumor regression grade. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2007, 237 patients were identified: 157 in the neoadjuvant therapy group and 80 in the nonneoadjuvant therapy group. Neoadjuvant therapy significantly reduced the number of lymph nodes harvested (P = 0.011). Compared with the nonneoadjuvant group, there were significantly fewer lymph nodes in the neoadjuvant early T stage group (P = 0.001), small tumor size group (P = 0.003), and low tumor regression grade group (P <0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the nonneoadjuvant group and the neoadjuvant advanced T stage (P = 0.664), large tumor (P = 0.815), and high tumor regression grade groups (P = 0.566). CONCLUSION: The current standard of lymph node harvest should be applied to patients with poorly responding primary tumors after neoadjuvant therapy. However, a new standard may be necessary to define the adequate number of lymph nodes for tumors that respond well to neoadjuvant therapy.
AB - PURPOSE: Recent reports indicate that neoadjuvant therapy significantly reduces the lymph node harvest of rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to interpret the lymph node harvest in this setting based on the primary tumor response. METHODS: All patients undergoing proctectomy were included. Three variables were used as indicators of primary tumor response: ypT stage, tumor size, and tumor regression grade. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2007, 237 patients were identified: 157 in the neoadjuvant therapy group and 80 in the nonneoadjuvant therapy group. Neoadjuvant therapy significantly reduced the number of lymph nodes harvested (P = 0.011). Compared with the nonneoadjuvant group, there were significantly fewer lymph nodes in the neoadjuvant early T stage group (P = 0.001), small tumor size group (P = 0.003), and low tumor regression grade group (P <0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the nonneoadjuvant group and the neoadjuvant advanced T stage (P = 0.664), large tumor (P = 0.815), and high tumor regression grade groups (P = 0.566). CONCLUSION: The current standard of lymph node harvest should be applied to patients with poorly responding primary tumors after neoadjuvant therapy. However, a new standard may be necessary to define the adequate number of lymph nodes for tumors that respond well to neoadjuvant therapy.
KW - Lymph nodes
KW - Neoadjuvant therapy
KW - Rectal cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66849121521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66849121521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/0b013e31819eb872
DO - 10.1007/0b013e31819eb872
M3 - Article
C2 - 19404052
SN - 0012-3706
VL - 52
SP - 549
EP - 557
JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
IS - 4
ER -