Lumbar and cervical spondylosis and spondylotic myelopathy

D. M. Long

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The problem of chronic spondylitic spinal disease is markedly underrepresented in the literature. The principal focus is on procedures and diagnostic techniques. It has been suggested that the classic clinical syndromes are rare and that interventional protocols based on them are likely to be inadequate. New diagnostic techniques have revolutionized the evaluation of patients: magnetic resonance imaging is now the standard whereas myelography use is being steadily reduced. It is clear that the outcome of spinal surgery for herniated disk, in expert hands, is excellent. Nevertheless, there is an emphasis on minimally invasive and percutaneous techniques to try to avoid major surgery, which has been the standard. The natural history of these problems is still understood incompletely. Long-term follow-ups are generally not available and the value of nearly every form of conservative care remains unproven.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)576-580
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume6
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Spondylosis
Spinal Cord Diseases
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Spinal Diseases
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Myelography
Natural History
Hand
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Lumbar and cervical spondylosis and spondylotic myelopathy. / Long, D. M.

In: Current Opinion in Neurology and Neurosurgery, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1993, p. 576-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85ef75c730f542e0aaeb5316a75bec75,
title = "Lumbar and cervical spondylosis and spondylotic myelopathy",
abstract = "The problem of chronic spondylitic spinal disease is markedly underrepresented in the literature. The principal focus is on procedures and diagnostic techniques. It has been suggested that the classic clinical syndromes are rare and that interventional protocols based on them are likely to be inadequate. New diagnostic techniques have revolutionized the evaluation of patients: magnetic resonance imaging is now the standard whereas myelography use is being steadily reduced. It is clear that the outcome of spinal surgery for herniated disk, in expert hands, is excellent. Nevertheless, there is an emphasis on minimally invasive and percutaneous techniques to try to avoid major surgery, which has been the standard. The natural history of these problems is still understood incompletely. Long-term follow-ups are generally not available and the value of nearly every form of conservative care remains unproven.",
author = "Long, {D. M.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "576--580",
journal = "Current Opinion in Neurology",
issn = "1350-7540",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lumbar and cervical spondylosis and spondylotic myelopathy

AU - Long, D. M.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The problem of chronic spondylitic spinal disease is markedly underrepresented in the literature. The principal focus is on procedures and diagnostic techniques. It has been suggested that the classic clinical syndromes are rare and that interventional protocols based on them are likely to be inadequate. New diagnostic techniques have revolutionized the evaluation of patients: magnetic resonance imaging is now the standard whereas myelography use is being steadily reduced. It is clear that the outcome of spinal surgery for herniated disk, in expert hands, is excellent. Nevertheless, there is an emphasis on minimally invasive and percutaneous techniques to try to avoid major surgery, which has been the standard. The natural history of these problems is still understood incompletely. Long-term follow-ups are generally not available and the value of nearly every form of conservative care remains unproven.

AB - The problem of chronic spondylitic spinal disease is markedly underrepresented in the literature. The principal focus is on procedures and diagnostic techniques. It has been suggested that the classic clinical syndromes are rare and that interventional protocols based on them are likely to be inadequate. New diagnostic techniques have revolutionized the evaluation of patients: magnetic resonance imaging is now the standard whereas myelography use is being steadily reduced. It is clear that the outcome of spinal surgery for herniated disk, in expert hands, is excellent. Nevertheless, there is an emphasis on minimally invasive and percutaneous techniques to try to avoid major surgery, which has been the standard. The natural history of these problems is still understood incompletely. Long-term follow-ups are generally not available and the value of nearly every form of conservative care remains unproven.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027242291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027242291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8400472

AN - SCOPUS:0027242291

VL - 6

SP - 576

EP - 580

JO - Current Opinion in Neurology

JF - Current Opinion in Neurology

SN - 1350-7540

IS - 4

ER -