Background: Recently, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that therapy with new oral activated factor X (Xa) inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) yielded a reduction of ischemic events. However, this therapy was associated with a dose-related increase in major bleeding complications. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise the clinical efficacy and safety of the lowest doses of oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with placebo in patients after a recent ACS. Methods: The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality. The rate of new myocardial infarction (MI) was the secondary efficacy endpoint, whereas major bleeding complications were recorded as a safety endpoint. Five RCTs were included in the meta-analysis enrolling a total of 25,643 patients. Results: There was no significant difference in mortality between patients treated with new antithrombotics compared with those receiving the standard therapy: odds ratio (OR), [95% confidence interval (CI)]=0.97 [0.72-1.31], p=0.86. Recurrent MI rates were decreased in the anti-Xa group: OR [95%CI]=0.86 [0.76-0.98], p=0.02, number needed to treat (NNT)=189. The administration of new oral anticoagulants was associated with a strongly increased risk of major bleedings compared with the standard treatment: OR [95%CI]=3.24 [2.29-4.59], p<0.001, number needed to harm (NNH)=104; similarly, intracranial bleeding rates were significantly higher in the anti-Xa arm. Conclusions: The addition of the new oral anticoagulants on top of standard therapy in the setting of ACS results in an excessive risk of major bleedings without any clear evidence of outweighing clinical benefits.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||7|
|State||Published - Aug 1 2013|
- Acute coronary syndrome
- Oral anti Xa anticoagulants
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine