Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT: A feasibility study

Rolf Symons, Tyler E. Cork, Pooyan Sahbaee, Matthew K. Fuld, Steffen Kappler, Les R. Folio, David A. Bluemke, Amir Pourmorteza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility of using a whole-body photon-counting detector (PCD) CT scanner for low-dose lung cancer screening compared to a conventional energy integrating detector (EID) system. Radiation dose-matched EID and PCD scans of the COPDGene 2 phantom were acquired at different radiation dose levels (CTDIvol: 3.0, 1.5, and 0.75 mGy) and different tube voltages (120, 100, and 80 kVp). EID and PCD images were compared for quantitative Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy, noise levels, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for detection of ground-glass nodules (GGN) and emphysema. The PCD HU accuracy was better than EID for water at all scan parameters. PCD HU stability for lung, GGN and emphysema regions were superior to EID and PCD attenuation values were more reproducible than EID for all scan parameters (all P < 0.01), while HUs for lung, GGN and emphysema ROIs changed significantly for EID with decreasing dose (all P < 0.001). PCD showed lower noise levels at the lowest dose setting at 120, 100 and 80 kVp (15.2 ± 0.3 HU versus 15.8 ± 0.2 HU, P = 0.03; 16.1 ± 0.3 HU versus 18.0 ± 0.4 HU, P = 0.003; and 16.1 ± 0.3 HU versus 17.9 ± 0.3 HU, P = 0.001, respectively), resulting in superior CNR for evaluation of GGNs and emphysema at 100 and 80 kVp. PCD provided better HU stability for lung, ground-glass, and emphysema-equivalent foams at lower radiation dose settings with better reproducibility than EID. Additionally, PCD showed up to 10% less noise, and 11% higher CNR at 0.75 mGy for both 100 and 80 kVp. PCD technology may help reduce radiation exposure in lung cancer screening while maintaining diagnostic quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)202-213
Number of pages12
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 7 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Feasibility Studies
Photons
Early Detection of Cancer
Lung Neoplasms
Emphysema
Noise
Glass
Radiation
Lung
Whole-Body Counting
Technology
Water

Keywords

  • computed tomography
  • ground-glass nodule/emphysema/low-contrast detectability
  • lung cancer screening
  • lung imaging
  • photon-counting CT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Symons, R., Cork, T. E., Sahbaee, P., Fuld, M. K., Kappler, S., Folio, L. R., ... Pourmorteza, A. (2017). Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT: A feasibility study. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 62(1), 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/202

Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT : A feasibility study. / Symons, Rolf; Cork, Tyler E.; Sahbaee, Pooyan; Fuld, Matthew K.; Kappler, Steffen; Folio, Les R.; Bluemke, David A.; Pourmorteza, Amir.

In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 62, No. 1, 07.01.2017, p. 202-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Symons, R, Cork, TE, Sahbaee, P, Fuld, MK, Kappler, S, Folio, LR, Bluemke, DA & Pourmorteza, A 2017, 'Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT: A feasibility study', Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/202
Symons, Rolf ; Cork, Tyler E. ; Sahbaee, Pooyan ; Fuld, Matthew K. ; Kappler, Steffen ; Folio, Les R. ; Bluemke, David A. ; Pourmorteza, Amir. / Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT : A feasibility study. In: Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2017 ; Vol. 62, No. 1. pp. 202-213.
@article{f43d2ce9ded04184a7228014f5371507,
title = "Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT: A feasibility study",
abstract = "To evaluate the feasibility of using a whole-body photon-counting detector (PCD) CT scanner for low-dose lung cancer screening compared to a conventional energy integrating detector (EID) system. Radiation dose-matched EID and PCD scans of the COPDGene 2 phantom were acquired at different radiation dose levels (CTDIvol: 3.0, 1.5, and 0.75 mGy) and different tube voltages (120, 100, and 80 kVp). EID and PCD images were compared for quantitative Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy, noise levels, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for detection of ground-glass nodules (GGN) and emphysema. The PCD HU accuracy was better than EID for water at all scan parameters. PCD HU stability for lung, GGN and emphysema regions were superior to EID and PCD attenuation values were more reproducible than EID for all scan parameters (all P < 0.01), while HUs for lung, GGN and emphysema ROIs changed significantly for EID with decreasing dose (all P < 0.001). PCD showed lower noise levels at the lowest dose setting at 120, 100 and 80 kVp (15.2 ± 0.3 HU versus 15.8 ± 0.2 HU, P = 0.03; 16.1 ± 0.3 HU versus 18.0 ± 0.4 HU, P = 0.003; and 16.1 ± 0.3 HU versus 17.9 ± 0.3 HU, P = 0.001, respectively), resulting in superior CNR for evaluation of GGNs and emphysema at 100 and 80 kVp. PCD provided better HU stability for lung, ground-glass, and emphysema-equivalent foams at lower radiation dose settings with better reproducibility than EID. Additionally, PCD showed up to 10{\%} less noise, and 11{\%} higher CNR at 0.75 mGy for both 100 and 80 kVp. PCD technology may help reduce radiation exposure in lung cancer screening while maintaining diagnostic quality.",
keywords = "computed tomography, ground-glass nodule/emphysema/low-contrast detectability, lung cancer screening, lung imaging, photon-counting CT",
author = "Rolf Symons and Cork, {Tyler E.} and Pooyan Sahbaee and Fuld, {Matthew K.} and Steffen Kappler and Folio, {Les R.} and Bluemke, {David A.} and Amir Pourmorteza",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/202",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "202--213",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT

T2 - A feasibility study

AU - Symons, Rolf

AU - Cork, Tyler E.

AU - Sahbaee, Pooyan

AU - Fuld, Matthew K.

AU - Kappler, Steffen

AU - Folio, Les R.

AU - Bluemke, David A.

AU - Pourmorteza, Amir

PY - 2017/1/7

Y1 - 2017/1/7

N2 - To evaluate the feasibility of using a whole-body photon-counting detector (PCD) CT scanner for low-dose lung cancer screening compared to a conventional energy integrating detector (EID) system. Radiation dose-matched EID and PCD scans of the COPDGene 2 phantom were acquired at different radiation dose levels (CTDIvol: 3.0, 1.5, and 0.75 mGy) and different tube voltages (120, 100, and 80 kVp). EID and PCD images were compared for quantitative Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy, noise levels, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for detection of ground-glass nodules (GGN) and emphysema. The PCD HU accuracy was better than EID for water at all scan parameters. PCD HU stability for lung, GGN and emphysema regions were superior to EID and PCD attenuation values were more reproducible than EID for all scan parameters (all P < 0.01), while HUs for lung, GGN and emphysema ROIs changed significantly for EID with decreasing dose (all P < 0.001). PCD showed lower noise levels at the lowest dose setting at 120, 100 and 80 kVp (15.2 ± 0.3 HU versus 15.8 ± 0.2 HU, P = 0.03; 16.1 ± 0.3 HU versus 18.0 ± 0.4 HU, P = 0.003; and 16.1 ± 0.3 HU versus 17.9 ± 0.3 HU, P = 0.001, respectively), resulting in superior CNR for evaluation of GGNs and emphysema at 100 and 80 kVp. PCD provided better HU stability for lung, ground-glass, and emphysema-equivalent foams at lower radiation dose settings with better reproducibility than EID. Additionally, PCD showed up to 10% less noise, and 11% higher CNR at 0.75 mGy for both 100 and 80 kVp. PCD technology may help reduce radiation exposure in lung cancer screening while maintaining diagnostic quality.

AB - To evaluate the feasibility of using a whole-body photon-counting detector (PCD) CT scanner for low-dose lung cancer screening compared to a conventional energy integrating detector (EID) system. Radiation dose-matched EID and PCD scans of the COPDGene 2 phantom were acquired at different radiation dose levels (CTDIvol: 3.0, 1.5, and 0.75 mGy) and different tube voltages (120, 100, and 80 kVp). EID and PCD images were compared for quantitative Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy, noise levels, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for detection of ground-glass nodules (GGN) and emphysema. The PCD HU accuracy was better than EID for water at all scan parameters. PCD HU stability for lung, GGN and emphysema regions were superior to EID and PCD attenuation values were more reproducible than EID for all scan parameters (all P < 0.01), while HUs for lung, GGN and emphysema ROIs changed significantly for EID with decreasing dose (all P < 0.001). PCD showed lower noise levels at the lowest dose setting at 120, 100 and 80 kVp (15.2 ± 0.3 HU versus 15.8 ± 0.2 HU, P = 0.03; 16.1 ± 0.3 HU versus 18.0 ± 0.4 HU, P = 0.003; and 16.1 ± 0.3 HU versus 17.9 ± 0.3 HU, P = 0.001, respectively), resulting in superior CNR for evaluation of GGNs and emphysema at 100 and 80 kVp. PCD provided better HU stability for lung, ground-glass, and emphysema-equivalent foams at lower radiation dose settings with better reproducibility than EID. Additionally, PCD showed up to 10% less noise, and 11% higher CNR at 0.75 mGy for both 100 and 80 kVp. PCD technology may help reduce radiation exposure in lung cancer screening while maintaining diagnostic quality.

KW - computed tomography

KW - ground-glass nodule/emphysema/low-contrast detectability

KW - lung cancer screening

KW - lung imaging

KW - photon-counting CT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007470621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007470621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/202

DO - 10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/202

M3 - Article

C2 - 27991453

AN - SCOPUS:85007470621

VL - 62

SP - 202

EP - 213

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 1

ER -