TY - JOUR
T1 - Loss of glove integrity during emergency department procedures
AU - Hansen, K. N.
AU - Korniewicz, D. M.
AU - Hexter, D. A.
AU - Kornilow, J. R.
AU - Kelen, G. D.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - Study objective: We sought to assess the loss of integrity of the latex- glove barrier during use in the ED setting. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in an urban ED and Level I trauma center. Procedures performed by ED health care workers (HCWs) were directly observed, timed, and categorized. The gloves used by the HCWs were collected and subjected to the standard US Food and Drug Administration leak test. Results: Ninety-nine (7.9%) of 1,254 pairs of gloves used for observed procedures leaked, compared with 2 of 200 unworn control pairs (1.0%) and 12 of 300 pairs that were worn put not used (4.0%). Leak rates varied by manufacturer and were higher for gloves worn 20 minutes or longer (13.7%, P=.015), used for four or more procedures (50%, P<.01), or used for critical care procedures (23.5%, P<.01). Sixty-six of an additional 325 pairs of gloves collected from unobserved critical care procedures (20.3%) leaked. Conclusion: Loss of glove integrity occurs during the performance of ED procedures, subjecting the HCW to possible infectious-fluid exposure. Risk of glove perforation increases with duration of wear, number of procedures performed, and the performance of critical care procedures.
AB - Study objective: We sought to assess the loss of integrity of the latex- glove barrier during use in the ED setting. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in an urban ED and Level I trauma center. Procedures performed by ED health care workers (HCWs) were directly observed, timed, and categorized. The gloves used by the HCWs were collected and subjected to the standard US Food and Drug Administration leak test. Results: Ninety-nine (7.9%) of 1,254 pairs of gloves used for observed procedures leaked, compared with 2 of 200 unworn control pairs (1.0%) and 12 of 300 pairs that were worn put not used (4.0%). Leak rates varied by manufacturer and were higher for gloves worn 20 minutes or longer (13.7%, P=.015), used for four or more procedures (50%, P<.01), or used for critical care procedures (23.5%, P<.01). Sixty-six of an additional 325 pairs of gloves collected from unobserved critical care procedures (20.3%) leaked. Conclusion: Loss of glove integrity occurs during the performance of ED procedures, subjecting the HCW to possible infectious-fluid exposure. Risk of glove perforation increases with duration of wear, number of procedures performed, and the performance of critical care procedures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031964410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031964410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70283-5
DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70283-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 9437344
AN - SCOPUS:0031964410
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 31
SP - 65
EP - 72
JO - Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians
JF - Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians
IS - 1
ER -