Longitudinal accuracy of web-based self-reported weights: Results from the hopkins power trial

Gerald J. Jerome, Arlene Dalcin, Janelle Coughlin, Stephanie Fitzpatrick, Nae Yuh Wang, Nowella Durkin, Hsin Chieh Yeh, Jeanne B Charleston, Thomas Pozefsky, Gail L Daumit, Jeanne Clark, Thomas Louis, Lawrence Appel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Websites and phone apps are increasingly used to track weights during weight loss interventions, yet the longitudinal accuracy of these self-reported weights is uncertain. Objective: Our goal was to compare the longitudinal accuracy of self-reported weights entered online during the course of a randomized weight loss trial to measurements taken in the clinic. We aimed to determine if accuracy of self-reported weight is associated with weight loss and to determine the extent of misclassification in achieving 5% weight loss when using self-reported compared to clinic weights. Methods: This study examined the accuracy of self-reported weights recorded online among intervention participants in the Hopkins Practice-Based Opportunities for Weight Reduction (POWER) trial, a randomized trial examining the effectiveness of two lifestyle-based weight loss interventions compared to a control group among obese adult patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. One treatment group was offered telephonic coaching and the other group was offered in-person individual coaching and group sessions. All intervention participants (n=277) received a digital scale and were asked to track their weight weekly on a study website. Research staff used a standard protocol to measure weight in the clinic. Differences (self-reported weight- clinic weight) indicate if self-report under (-) or over (+) estimated clinic weight using the self-reported weight that was closest in time to the clinic weight and was within a window ranging from the day of the clinic visit to 7 days before the 6-month (n=225) and 24-month (n=191) clinic visits. The absolute value of the differences (absolute difference) describes the overall accuracy. Results: Underestimation of self-reported weights increased significantly from 6 months (mean-0.5kg, SD 1.0kg) to 24 months (mean-1.1kg, SD 2.0kg; P=.002). The average absolute difference also increased from 6 months (mean 0.7kg, SD 0.8kg) to 24 months (mean 1.3, SD 1.8kg; P

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Weights and Measures
Weight Loss
Ambulatory Care
Power (Psychology)
Self Report
Life Style
Control Groups
Research

Keywords

  • Internet
  • Obesity
  • Self-report
  • Weight loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{4fe46a7ef8504047b227128f6be4eed8,
title = "Longitudinal accuracy of web-based self-reported weights: Results from the hopkins power trial",
abstract = "Websites and phone apps are increasingly used to track weights during weight loss interventions, yet the longitudinal accuracy of these self-reported weights is uncertain. Objective: Our goal was to compare the longitudinal accuracy of self-reported weights entered online during the course of a randomized weight loss trial to measurements taken in the clinic. We aimed to determine if accuracy of self-reported weight is associated with weight loss and to determine the extent of misclassification in achieving 5{\%} weight loss when using self-reported compared to clinic weights. Methods: This study examined the accuracy of self-reported weights recorded online among intervention participants in the Hopkins Practice-Based Opportunities for Weight Reduction (POWER) trial, a randomized trial examining the effectiveness of two lifestyle-based weight loss interventions compared to a control group among obese adult patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. One treatment group was offered telephonic coaching and the other group was offered in-person individual coaching and group sessions. All intervention participants (n=277) received a digital scale and were asked to track their weight weekly on a study website. Research staff used a standard protocol to measure weight in the clinic. Differences (self-reported weight- clinic weight) indicate if self-report under (-) or over (+) estimated clinic weight using the self-reported weight that was closest in time to the clinic weight and was within a window ranging from the day of the clinic visit to 7 days before the 6-month (n=225) and 24-month (n=191) clinic visits. The absolute value of the differences (absolute difference) describes the overall accuracy. Results: Underestimation of self-reported weights increased significantly from 6 months (mean-0.5kg, SD 1.0kg) to 24 months (mean-1.1kg, SD 2.0kg; P=.002). The average absolute difference also increased from 6 months (mean 0.7kg, SD 0.8kg) to 24 months (mean 1.3, SD 1.8kg; P",
keywords = "Internet, Obesity, Self-report, Weight loss",
author = "Jerome, {Gerald J.} and Arlene Dalcin and Janelle Coughlin and Stephanie Fitzpatrick and Wang, {Nae Yuh} and Nowella Durkin and Yeh, {Hsin Chieh} and Charleston, {Jeanne B} and Thomas Pozefsky and Daumit, {Gail L} and Jeanne Clark and Thomas Louis and Lawrence Appel",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.2196/jmir.3332",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Longitudinal accuracy of web-based self-reported weights

T2 - Results from the hopkins power trial

AU - Jerome, Gerald J.

AU - Dalcin, Arlene

AU - Coughlin, Janelle

AU - Fitzpatrick, Stephanie

AU - Wang, Nae Yuh

AU - Durkin, Nowella

AU - Yeh, Hsin Chieh

AU - Charleston, Jeanne B

AU - Pozefsky, Thomas

AU - Daumit, Gail L

AU - Clark, Jeanne

AU - Louis, Thomas

AU - Appel, Lawrence

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Websites and phone apps are increasingly used to track weights during weight loss interventions, yet the longitudinal accuracy of these self-reported weights is uncertain. Objective: Our goal was to compare the longitudinal accuracy of self-reported weights entered online during the course of a randomized weight loss trial to measurements taken in the clinic. We aimed to determine if accuracy of self-reported weight is associated with weight loss and to determine the extent of misclassification in achieving 5% weight loss when using self-reported compared to clinic weights. Methods: This study examined the accuracy of self-reported weights recorded online among intervention participants in the Hopkins Practice-Based Opportunities for Weight Reduction (POWER) trial, a randomized trial examining the effectiveness of two lifestyle-based weight loss interventions compared to a control group among obese adult patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. One treatment group was offered telephonic coaching and the other group was offered in-person individual coaching and group sessions. All intervention participants (n=277) received a digital scale and were asked to track their weight weekly on a study website. Research staff used a standard protocol to measure weight in the clinic. Differences (self-reported weight- clinic weight) indicate if self-report under (-) or over (+) estimated clinic weight using the self-reported weight that was closest in time to the clinic weight and was within a window ranging from the day of the clinic visit to 7 days before the 6-month (n=225) and 24-month (n=191) clinic visits. The absolute value of the differences (absolute difference) describes the overall accuracy. Results: Underestimation of self-reported weights increased significantly from 6 months (mean-0.5kg, SD 1.0kg) to 24 months (mean-1.1kg, SD 2.0kg; P=.002). The average absolute difference also increased from 6 months (mean 0.7kg, SD 0.8kg) to 24 months (mean 1.3, SD 1.8kg; P

AB - Websites and phone apps are increasingly used to track weights during weight loss interventions, yet the longitudinal accuracy of these self-reported weights is uncertain. Objective: Our goal was to compare the longitudinal accuracy of self-reported weights entered online during the course of a randomized weight loss trial to measurements taken in the clinic. We aimed to determine if accuracy of self-reported weight is associated with weight loss and to determine the extent of misclassification in achieving 5% weight loss when using self-reported compared to clinic weights. Methods: This study examined the accuracy of self-reported weights recorded online among intervention participants in the Hopkins Practice-Based Opportunities for Weight Reduction (POWER) trial, a randomized trial examining the effectiveness of two lifestyle-based weight loss interventions compared to a control group among obese adult patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. One treatment group was offered telephonic coaching and the other group was offered in-person individual coaching and group sessions. All intervention participants (n=277) received a digital scale and were asked to track their weight weekly on a study website. Research staff used a standard protocol to measure weight in the clinic. Differences (self-reported weight- clinic weight) indicate if self-report under (-) or over (+) estimated clinic weight using the self-reported weight that was closest in time to the clinic weight and was within a window ranging from the day of the clinic visit to 7 days before the 6-month (n=225) and 24-month (n=191) clinic visits. The absolute value of the differences (absolute difference) describes the overall accuracy. Results: Underestimation of self-reported weights increased significantly from 6 months (mean-0.5kg, SD 1.0kg) to 24 months (mean-1.1kg, SD 2.0kg; P=.002). The average absolute difference also increased from 6 months (mean 0.7kg, SD 0.8kg) to 24 months (mean 1.3, SD 1.8kg; P

KW - Internet

KW - Obesity

KW - Self-report

KW - Weight loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906242356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906242356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/jmir.3332

DO - 10.2196/jmir.3332

M3 - Article

C2 - 25042773

AN - SCOPUS:84906242356

VL - 16

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 7

ER -