Long-Term Outcomes of Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States

Haris Muhammad, Merve Gurakar, Peng Sheng Ting, Anas M. Alsughayer, Harry Luu, Duha Zaffar, Saleh Alqahtani, Alan Bonder, Ahmet Gurakar, Behnam Saberi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: Although living donor liver transplant has become a vital treatment option in hepatocellular carcinoma, controversy remains on whether recurrence and survival rates are different versus deceased donor recipients. Here, we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between recipients of living and deceased donor liver transplants for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Materials and Methods: Our comparisons used data from the United Network of Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Results: There were 385 living donor and 25 274 deceased donor liver transplant recipients with diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplant list wait times of ≥6 months were more common in deceased donor (55.9%) versus living donor recipients (45.2%; P < .001). Both recipient groups were comparable with regard to alpha-fetoprotein level <200 ng/mL (P = .18). Only a small percentage in both groups had ≥3 total tumors (P = .73); both groups had similar low transplants outside of Milan criteria (P = .45). Overall, 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates for deceased versus living donor recipients were similar (91.2% vs 92%, 74% vs 76.4%, 58.9% vs 56.5%; P = .69). On multivariate analysis, Black/African American race/ethnicity was associated with worse outcomes than White race/ethnicity as reference (P < .001), whereas Hispanic and Asian race/ethnicity were more protected. Hepatitis C virus as liver disease etiology was associated with worse outcomes than other etiologies. Tumor characteristics, ≥3 lesions, tumor size, and higher alpha-fetoprotein levels were associated with worse outcomes. Living donor transplant was not associated with higher hazard of death. Among living donor recipients only, largest tumor size was associated with higher risk of death (P = .005). Conclusions: Survival was similar in between the living donor versus deceased donor recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma. With changes in Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exception policies for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States, living donor transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma could expand the donor pool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-284
Number of pages6
JournalExperimental and Clinical Transplantation
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2022

Keywords

  • Hepatitis C virus
  • Model for End-Stage Liver Disease
  • Multivariate analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-Term Outcomes of Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this