Long-Term care facilities: Important participants of the acute care facility social network?

Bruce Lee, Yeohan Song, Sarah Bartsch, Diane S. Kim, Ashima Singh, Taliser R. Avery, Shawn T. Brown, S. Levent Yilmaz, Kim F. Wong, Margaret A. Potter, Donald S. Burke, Richard Platt, Susan S. Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Acute care facilities are connected via patient sharing, forming a network. However, patient sharing extends beyond this immediate network to include sharing with long-term care facilities. The extent of long-term care facility patient sharing on the acute care facility network is unknown. The objective of this study was to characterize and determine the extent and pattern of patient transfers to, from, and between long-term care facilities on the network of acute care facilities in a large metropolitan county. Methods/Principal Findings: We applied social network constructs principles, measures, and frameworks to all 2007 annual adult and pediatric patient transfers among the healthcare facilities in Orange County, California, using data from surveys and several datasets. We evaluated general network and centrality measures as well as individual ego measures and further constructed sociograms. Our results show that over the course of a year, 66 of 72 long-term care facilities directly sent and 67 directly received patients from other long-term care facilities. Long-term care facilities added 1,524 ties between the acute care facilities when ties represented at least one patient transfer. Geodesic distance did not closely correlate with the geographic distance among facilities. Conclusions/Significance: This study demonstrates the extent to which long-term care facilities are connected to the acute care facility patient sharing network. Many long-term care facilities were connected by patient transfers and further added many connections to the acute care facility network. This suggests that policy-makers and health officials should account for patient sharing with and among long-term care facilities as well as those among acute care facilities when evaluating policies and interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere29342
JournalPLoS One
Volume6
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 27 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

long term care
social networks
Long-Term Care
Social Support
Patient Transfer
Ego
Administrative Personnel
health services
Patient Care
Pediatrics
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Long-Term care facilities : Important participants of the acute care facility social network? / Lee, Bruce; Song, Yeohan; Bartsch, Sarah; Kim, Diane S.; Singh, Ashima; Avery, Taliser R.; Brown, Shawn T.; Yilmaz, S. Levent; Wong, Kim F.; Potter, Margaret A.; Burke, Donald S.; Platt, Richard; Huang, Susan S.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 6, No. 12, e29342, 27.12.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, B, Song, Y, Bartsch, S, Kim, DS, Singh, A, Avery, TR, Brown, ST, Yilmaz, SL, Wong, KF, Potter, MA, Burke, DS, Platt, R & Huang, SS 2011, 'Long-Term care facilities: Important participants of the acute care facility social network?', PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 12, e29342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029342
Lee, Bruce ; Song, Yeohan ; Bartsch, Sarah ; Kim, Diane S. ; Singh, Ashima ; Avery, Taliser R. ; Brown, Shawn T. ; Yilmaz, S. Levent ; Wong, Kim F. ; Potter, Margaret A. ; Burke, Donald S. ; Platt, Richard ; Huang, Susan S. / Long-Term care facilities : Important participants of the acute care facility social network?. In: PLoS One. 2011 ; Vol. 6, No. 12.
@article{712e5263e0524f70aefd5385ed54aef6,
title = "Long-Term care facilities: Important participants of the acute care facility social network?",
abstract = "Background: Acute care facilities are connected via patient sharing, forming a network. However, patient sharing extends beyond this immediate network to include sharing with long-term care facilities. The extent of long-term care facility patient sharing on the acute care facility network is unknown. The objective of this study was to characterize and determine the extent and pattern of patient transfers to, from, and between long-term care facilities on the network of acute care facilities in a large metropolitan county. Methods/Principal Findings: We applied social network constructs principles, measures, and frameworks to all 2007 annual adult and pediatric patient transfers among the healthcare facilities in Orange County, California, using data from surveys and several datasets. We evaluated general network and centrality measures as well as individual ego measures and further constructed sociograms. Our results show that over the course of a year, 66 of 72 long-term care facilities directly sent and 67 directly received patients from other long-term care facilities. Long-term care facilities added 1,524 ties between the acute care facilities when ties represented at least one patient transfer. Geodesic distance did not closely correlate with the geographic distance among facilities. Conclusions/Significance: This study demonstrates the extent to which long-term care facilities are connected to the acute care facility patient sharing network. Many long-term care facilities were connected by patient transfers and further added many connections to the acute care facility network. This suggests that policy-makers and health officials should account for patient sharing with and among long-term care facilities as well as those among acute care facilities when evaluating policies and interventions.",
author = "Bruce Lee and Yeohan Song and Sarah Bartsch and Kim, {Diane S.} and Ashima Singh and Avery, {Taliser R.} and Brown, {Shawn T.} and Yilmaz, {S. Levent} and Wong, {Kim F.} and Potter, {Margaret A.} and Burke, {Donald S.} and Richard Platt and Huang, {Susan S.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0029342",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-Term care facilities

T2 - Important participants of the acute care facility social network?

AU - Lee, Bruce

AU - Song, Yeohan

AU - Bartsch, Sarah

AU - Kim, Diane S.

AU - Singh, Ashima

AU - Avery, Taliser R.

AU - Brown, Shawn T.

AU - Yilmaz, S. Levent

AU - Wong, Kim F.

AU - Potter, Margaret A.

AU - Burke, Donald S.

AU - Platt, Richard

AU - Huang, Susan S.

PY - 2011/12/27

Y1 - 2011/12/27

N2 - Background: Acute care facilities are connected via patient sharing, forming a network. However, patient sharing extends beyond this immediate network to include sharing with long-term care facilities. The extent of long-term care facility patient sharing on the acute care facility network is unknown. The objective of this study was to characterize and determine the extent and pattern of patient transfers to, from, and between long-term care facilities on the network of acute care facilities in a large metropolitan county. Methods/Principal Findings: We applied social network constructs principles, measures, and frameworks to all 2007 annual adult and pediatric patient transfers among the healthcare facilities in Orange County, California, using data from surveys and several datasets. We evaluated general network and centrality measures as well as individual ego measures and further constructed sociograms. Our results show that over the course of a year, 66 of 72 long-term care facilities directly sent and 67 directly received patients from other long-term care facilities. Long-term care facilities added 1,524 ties between the acute care facilities when ties represented at least one patient transfer. Geodesic distance did not closely correlate with the geographic distance among facilities. Conclusions/Significance: This study demonstrates the extent to which long-term care facilities are connected to the acute care facility patient sharing network. Many long-term care facilities were connected by patient transfers and further added many connections to the acute care facility network. This suggests that policy-makers and health officials should account for patient sharing with and among long-term care facilities as well as those among acute care facilities when evaluating policies and interventions.

AB - Background: Acute care facilities are connected via patient sharing, forming a network. However, patient sharing extends beyond this immediate network to include sharing with long-term care facilities. The extent of long-term care facility patient sharing on the acute care facility network is unknown. The objective of this study was to characterize and determine the extent and pattern of patient transfers to, from, and between long-term care facilities on the network of acute care facilities in a large metropolitan county. Methods/Principal Findings: We applied social network constructs principles, measures, and frameworks to all 2007 annual adult and pediatric patient transfers among the healthcare facilities in Orange County, California, using data from surveys and several datasets. We evaluated general network and centrality measures as well as individual ego measures and further constructed sociograms. Our results show that over the course of a year, 66 of 72 long-term care facilities directly sent and 67 directly received patients from other long-term care facilities. Long-term care facilities added 1,524 ties between the acute care facilities when ties represented at least one patient transfer. Geodesic distance did not closely correlate with the geographic distance among facilities. Conclusions/Significance: This study demonstrates the extent to which long-term care facilities are connected to the acute care facility patient sharing network. Many long-term care facilities were connected by patient transfers and further added many connections to the acute care facility network. This suggests that policy-makers and health officials should account for patient sharing with and among long-term care facilities as well as those among acute care facilities when evaluating policies and interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84455161574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84455161574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0029342

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0029342

M3 - Article

C2 - 22216255

AN - SCOPUS:84455161574

VL - 6

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 12

M1 - e29342

ER -