Local food protection and safety infrastructure and capacity: A Maryland case study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:: In Maryland, county Food Protection Programs (FPP), housed within Environmental Public Health (EPH) Divisions, maintain responsibility for regular inspection of all food service facilities (FSF). With growing concerns about how our food supply is protected, it is important to determine the state and effectiveness of our food safety systems. This research elucidates the roles, responsibilities, strengths, and weaknesses of Food Safety and Protection Programs in Maryland. Methods: A 16-question survey tool, which addressed facets of the local food protection infrastructure, including FSF inspections, staffing, budget, and foodborne illness surveillance, was distributed to all 24 county FPP. Results: The number of FSF in Maryland increased 97% from 2001 to 2006 and counties had an average inspection completion rate of 73%, with a 4% increase over the time period. Statewide, there were 4.1 EPH full-time employees (FTE) per 10 000 population and 1.6 FPP FTE per 10 000 population. EPH Division budgets increased 63% statewide, from $19.5 million in 2000 to $31.9 million in 2007. FPP budgets also increased 59% over the period, from $6.2 million in 2000 to $9.8 million in 2007. Conclusions: This study offers new quantitative measures of the demands, capacities, and performance of Food Protection and Safety Programs in Maryland. This assessment of local EPH and FPP capacity also offers insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the local food protection and safety infrastructure. Importantly, it reveals an infrastructure and dedicated food protection workforce that inspects the food supply and responds to foodborne illness outbreaks. Yet, resources vary substantially from county to county, impacting which services can be provided and how well they can be performed. This can, in turn, impact the potential risk of foodborne illness and the public's overall health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)534-541
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Food Safety
Environmental Health
Food
Food Services
Public Health
Foodborne Diseases
Budgets
Food Supply
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
Population
Disease Outbreaks
Research

Keywords

  • environmental public health
  • food safety and protection
  • infrastructure
  • local capacity
  • public health services and systems research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{f947847d53204552930933d1104829f6,
title = "Local food protection and safety infrastructure and capacity: A Maryland case study",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION:: In Maryland, county Food Protection Programs (FPP), housed within Environmental Public Health (EPH) Divisions, maintain responsibility for regular inspection of all food service facilities (FSF). With growing concerns about how our food supply is protected, it is important to determine the state and effectiveness of our food safety systems. This research elucidates the roles, responsibilities, strengths, and weaknesses of Food Safety and Protection Programs in Maryland. Methods: A 16-question survey tool, which addressed facets of the local food protection infrastructure, including FSF inspections, staffing, budget, and foodborne illness surveillance, was distributed to all 24 county FPP. Results: The number of FSF in Maryland increased 97{\%} from 2001 to 2006 and counties had an average inspection completion rate of 73{\%}, with a 4{\%} increase over the time period. Statewide, there were 4.1 EPH full-time employees (FTE) per 10 000 population and 1.6 FPP FTE per 10 000 population. EPH Division budgets increased 63{\%} statewide, from $19.5 million in 2000 to $31.9 million in 2007. FPP budgets also increased 59{\%} over the period, from $6.2 million in 2000 to $9.8 million in 2007. Conclusions: This study offers new quantitative measures of the demands, capacities, and performance of Food Protection and Safety Programs in Maryland. This assessment of local EPH and FPP capacity also offers insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the local food protection and safety infrastructure. Importantly, it reveals an infrastructure and dedicated food protection workforce that inspects the food supply and responds to foodborne illness outbreaks. Yet, resources vary substantially from county to county, impacting which services can be provided and how well they can be performed. This can, in turn, impact the potential risk of foodborne illness and the public's overall health.",
keywords = "environmental public health, food safety and protection, infrastructure, local capacity, public health services and systems research",
author = "Kufel, {Joanna Zablotsky} and Beth Resnick and Fox, {Mary A} and Shannon Frattaroli and Andrea Gielen and Thomas Burke",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0b013e318211b47b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "534--541",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Local food protection and safety infrastructure and capacity

T2 - A Maryland case study

AU - Kufel, Joanna Zablotsky

AU - Resnick, Beth

AU - Fox, Mary A

AU - Frattaroli, Shannon

AU - Gielen, Andrea

AU - Burke, Thomas

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - INTRODUCTION:: In Maryland, county Food Protection Programs (FPP), housed within Environmental Public Health (EPH) Divisions, maintain responsibility for regular inspection of all food service facilities (FSF). With growing concerns about how our food supply is protected, it is important to determine the state and effectiveness of our food safety systems. This research elucidates the roles, responsibilities, strengths, and weaknesses of Food Safety and Protection Programs in Maryland. Methods: A 16-question survey tool, which addressed facets of the local food protection infrastructure, including FSF inspections, staffing, budget, and foodborne illness surveillance, was distributed to all 24 county FPP. Results: The number of FSF in Maryland increased 97% from 2001 to 2006 and counties had an average inspection completion rate of 73%, with a 4% increase over the time period. Statewide, there were 4.1 EPH full-time employees (FTE) per 10 000 population and 1.6 FPP FTE per 10 000 population. EPH Division budgets increased 63% statewide, from $19.5 million in 2000 to $31.9 million in 2007. FPP budgets also increased 59% over the period, from $6.2 million in 2000 to $9.8 million in 2007. Conclusions: This study offers new quantitative measures of the demands, capacities, and performance of Food Protection and Safety Programs in Maryland. This assessment of local EPH and FPP capacity also offers insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the local food protection and safety infrastructure. Importantly, it reveals an infrastructure and dedicated food protection workforce that inspects the food supply and responds to foodborne illness outbreaks. Yet, resources vary substantially from county to county, impacting which services can be provided and how well they can be performed. This can, in turn, impact the potential risk of foodborne illness and the public's overall health.

AB - INTRODUCTION:: In Maryland, county Food Protection Programs (FPP), housed within Environmental Public Health (EPH) Divisions, maintain responsibility for regular inspection of all food service facilities (FSF). With growing concerns about how our food supply is protected, it is important to determine the state and effectiveness of our food safety systems. This research elucidates the roles, responsibilities, strengths, and weaknesses of Food Safety and Protection Programs in Maryland. Methods: A 16-question survey tool, which addressed facets of the local food protection infrastructure, including FSF inspections, staffing, budget, and foodborne illness surveillance, was distributed to all 24 county FPP. Results: The number of FSF in Maryland increased 97% from 2001 to 2006 and counties had an average inspection completion rate of 73%, with a 4% increase over the time period. Statewide, there were 4.1 EPH full-time employees (FTE) per 10 000 population and 1.6 FPP FTE per 10 000 population. EPH Division budgets increased 63% statewide, from $19.5 million in 2000 to $31.9 million in 2007. FPP budgets also increased 59% over the period, from $6.2 million in 2000 to $9.8 million in 2007. Conclusions: This study offers new quantitative measures of the demands, capacities, and performance of Food Protection and Safety Programs in Maryland. This assessment of local EPH and FPP capacity also offers insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the local food protection and safety infrastructure. Importantly, it reveals an infrastructure and dedicated food protection workforce that inspects the food supply and responds to foodborne illness outbreaks. Yet, resources vary substantially from county to county, impacting which services can be provided and how well they can be performed. This can, in turn, impact the potential risk of foodborne illness and the public's overall health.

KW - environmental public health

KW - food safety and protection

KW - infrastructure

KW - local capacity

KW - public health services and systems research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053636219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053636219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318211b47b

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318211b47b

M3 - Article

C2 - 21964366

AN - SCOPUS:80053636219

VL - 17

SP - 534

EP - 541

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 6

ER -