Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: Interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest

Maya Viner, Gustavo Mercier, Frank Hao, Ashish Malladi, Rathan M. Subramaniam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate how interreader agreement and the site of the volume of interest (VOI) affect the agreement and variability of liver mean standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SULmean) at fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of PET/CT images and patient records. PET/CT images were reviewed in 116 randomly selected patients who had undergone a baseline PET/CT examination and who had normal livers according to imaging and biochemical test results. A 30-mmdiameter spherical VOI was placed within the right lobe of the liver above, below, and at the level of the main portal vein. Two readers performed all measurements independently. Analysis of variance, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis were performed. Results: The mean SULmean was between 2.11 and 2.17 at the upper, portal, and lower levels of the right lobe of the liver. The coefficient of variance was between 21.0% and 23.1%, without significant differences for location, with the least variance in the upper level. The ICC of the two readers varied between 0.98 and 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97, 0.99; P = .0001) at each level. The greatest precision (narrowest CI) was also in the upper level. Bias was 0.025±0.10 (standard deviation) at the upper level, was 0.004±0.14 at the lower level, and was 0.047±0.10 at the portal vein (P = .02). For each reader, there was almost perfect reliability between the SULmean measurements made at the three levels, with an ICC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98, 0.99; P = .0001). Conclusion: Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT has excellent interreader agreement, with similar values and variance whether measured at the upper, lower, or portal vein levels within the right lobe of the liver.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)596-601
Number of pages6
JournalRadiology
Volume267
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Liver
Portal Vein
Confidence Intervals
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Research Ethics Committees
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Analysis of Variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Viner, M., Mercier, G., Hao, F., Malladi, A., & Subramaniam, R. M. (2013). Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: Interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest. Radiology, 267(2), 596-601. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12121385

Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT : Interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest. / Viner, Maya; Mercier, Gustavo; Hao, Frank; Malladi, Ashish; Subramaniam, Rathan M.

In: Radiology, Vol. 267, No. 2, 05.2013, p. 596-601.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Viner, M, Mercier, G, Hao, F, Malladi, A & Subramaniam, RM 2013, 'Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: Interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest', Radiology, vol. 267, no. 2, pp. 596-601. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12121385
Viner, Maya ; Mercier, Gustavo ; Hao, Frank ; Malladi, Ashish ; Subramaniam, Rathan M. / Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT : Interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest. In: Radiology. 2013 ; Vol. 267, No. 2. pp. 596-601.
@article{8568b51250954c9bb70e58b432e7edfc,
title = "Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: Interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate how interreader agreement and the site of the volume of interest (VOI) affect the agreement and variability of liver mean standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SULmean) at fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of PET/CT images and patient records. PET/CT images were reviewed in 116 randomly selected patients who had undergone a baseline PET/CT examination and who had normal livers according to imaging and biochemical test results. A 30-mmdiameter spherical VOI was placed within the right lobe of the liver above, below, and at the level of the main portal vein. Two readers performed all measurements independently. Analysis of variance, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis were performed. Results: The mean SULmean was between 2.11 and 2.17 at the upper, portal, and lower levels of the right lobe of the liver. The coefficient of variance was between 21.0{\%} and 23.1{\%}, without significant differences for location, with the least variance in the upper level. The ICC of the two readers varied between 0.98 and 0.99 (95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 0.97, 0.99; P = .0001) at each level. The greatest precision (narrowest CI) was also in the upper level. Bias was 0.025±0.10 (standard deviation) at the upper level, was 0.004±0.14 at the lower level, and was 0.047±0.10 at the portal vein (P = .02). For each reader, there was almost perfect reliability between the SULmean measurements made at the three levels, with an ICC of 0.98 (95{\%} CI: 0.98, 0.99; P = .0001). Conclusion: Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT has excellent interreader agreement, with similar values and variance whether measured at the upper, lower, or portal vein levels within the right lobe of the liver.",
author = "Maya Viner and Gustavo Mercier and Frank Hao and Ashish Malladi and Subramaniam, {Rathan M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1148/radiol.12121385",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "267",
pages = "596--601",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT

T2 - Interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest

AU - Viner, Maya

AU - Mercier, Gustavo

AU - Hao, Frank

AU - Malladi, Ashish

AU - Subramaniam, Rathan M.

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate how interreader agreement and the site of the volume of interest (VOI) affect the agreement and variability of liver mean standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SULmean) at fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of PET/CT images and patient records. PET/CT images were reviewed in 116 randomly selected patients who had undergone a baseline PET/CT examination and who had normal livers according to imaging and biochemical test results. A 30-mmdiameter spherical VOI was placed within the right lobe of the liver above, below, and at the level of the main portal vein. Two readers performed all measurements independently. Analysis of variance, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis were performed. Results: The mean SULmean was between 2.11 and 2.17 at the upper, portal, and lower levels of the right lobe of the liver. The coefficient of variance was between 21.0% and 23.1%, without significant differences for location, with the least variance in the upper level. The ICC of the two readers varied between 0.98 and 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97, 0.99; P = .0001) at each level. The greatest precision (narrowest CI) was also in the upper level. Bias was 0.025±0.10 (standard deviation) at the upper level, was 0.004±0.14 at the lower level, and was 0.047±0.10 at the portal vein (P = .02). For each reader, there was almost perfect reliability between the SULmean measurements made at the three levels, with an ICC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98, 0.99; P = .0001). Conclusion: Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT has excellent interreader agreement, with similar values and variance whether measured at the upper, lower, or portal vein levels within the right lobe of the liver.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate how interreader agreement and the site of the volume of interest (VOI) affect the agreement and variability of liver mean standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SULmean) at fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of PET/CT images and patient records. PET/CT images were reviewed in 116 randomly selected patients who had undergone a baseline PET/CT examination and who had normal livers according to imaging and biochemical test results. A 30-mmdiameter spherical VOI was placed within the right lobe of the liver above, below, and at the level of the main portal vein. Two readers performed all measurements independently. Analysis of variance, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis were performed. Results: The mean SULmean was between 2.11 and 2.17 at the upper, portal, and lower levels of the right lobe of the liver. The coefficient of variance was between 21.0% and 23.1%, without significant differences for location, with the least variance in the upper level. The ICC of the two readers varied between 0.98 and 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97, 0.99; P = .0001) at each level. The greatest precision (narrowest CI) was also in the upper level. Bias was 0.025±0.10 (standard deviation) at the upper level, was 0.004±0.14 at the lower level, and was 0.047±0.10 at the portal vein (P = .02). For each reader, there was almost perfect reliability between the SULmean measurements made at the three levels, with an ICC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98, 0.99; P = .0001). Conclusion: Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT has excellent interreader agreement, with similar values and variance whether measured at the upper, lower, or portal vein levels within the right lobe of the liver.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876934468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876934468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.12121385

DO - 10.1148/radiol.12121385

M3 - Article

C2 - 23297330

AN - SCOPUS:84876934468

VL - 267

SP - 596

EP - 601

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -