Live donor champion: Finding live kidney donors by separating the advocate from the patient

Jacqueline M. Garonzik-Wang, Jonathan C. Berger, Reside Lorie Ros, Lauren M. Kucirka, Neha A. Deshpande, Brian J. Boyarsky, Robert Avery Montgomery, Erin C. Hall, Nathan T. James, Dorry L. Segev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

83 Scopus citations


Background: Lack of education and reluctance to initiate a conversation about live donor kidney transplantation is a common barrier to finding a donor. Although transplant candidates are often hesitant to discuss their illness, friends or family members are often eager to spread awareness and are empowered by advocating for the candidates. We hypothesized that separating the advocate from the patient is important in identifying live donors. Methods: We developed an intervention to train a live donor champion (LDC; a friend, family member, or community member willing to advocate for the candidate) for this advocacy role. We compared outcomes of 15 adult kidney transplant candidates who had no prospective donors and underwent the LDC intervention with 15 matched controls from our waiting list. Results: Comfort in initiating a conversation about transplantation increased over time for LDCs. Twenty-five potential donors contacted our center on behalf of LDC participants; four participants achieved live donor kidney transplantation and three additional participants have donors in evaluation, compared with zero among matched controls (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Transplant candidates are ill equipped to seek live donors; by separating the advocate from the patient, understandable concerns about initiating conversations are reduced.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1147-1150
Number of pages4
Issue number11
StatePublished - Jun 15 2012


  • Communication strategies
  • Education
  • Live donor transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation


Dive into the research topics of 'Live donor champion: Finding live kidney donors by separating the advocate from the patient'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this