Lipoprotein-cholesterol analysis during screening: Accuracy and reliability

Paul S. Bachorik, Teresa A. Cloey, Cheryl A. Finney, David R. Lowry, Diane M Becker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of lipoproteincholesterol measurements obtained during screening. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: From November 1989 to January 1990, 154 adults were screened. Measurements: Split venous samples from fasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-densitylipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with screening and standardized laboratory methods. Low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels were calculated using the Friedewald equation. Split venous samples from nonfasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol. Capillary blood samples were analyzed for total cholesterol with the screening method. Main Results: Total cholesterol measurements in screening venous blood samples were 5.4% and 3.8% lower than the laboratory values in samples from fasting and nonfasting participants, respectively. Triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol values in venous samples obtained from fasting participants were, on average, 9.8% and 11.2% lower than the respective laboratory measurements. Screening HDL-cholesterol values varied, differing from the laboratory values by as much as 40% in 95% of participants. In fasting participants, total cholesterol in capillary samples averaged 5.5% higher than in venous samples; in nonfasting participants the capillary samples were 3.1% higher. Screening for either total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol identified 93% of the persons with LDL-cholesterol values of 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) or higher. Conclusions: Total cholesterol can be reliably measured in samples from fasting or nonfasting persons. The values in capillary blood samples were slightly higher than those in venous samples. Screening HDL-cholesterol values were too variable to establish the HDL-cholesterol level reliably. Participants with high LDL-cholesterol levels were identified as accurately by measuring total cholesterol only when compared with calculating the LDL-cholesterol level from total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL-cholesterol concentrations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)741-747
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume114
Issue number9
StatePublished - May 1 1991

Fingerprint

Cholesterol
LDL Cholesterol
Fasting
Triglycerides
lipoprotein cholesterol
Hypercholesterolemia
HDL Cholesterol
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Bachorik, P. S., Cloey, T. A., Finney, C. A., Lowry, D. R., & Becker, D. M. (1991). Lipoprotein-cholesterol analysis during screening: Accuracy and reliability. Annals of Internal Medicine, 114(9), 741-747.

Lipoprotein-cholesterol analysis during screening : Accuracy and reliability. / Bachorik, Paul S.; Cloey, Teresa A.; Finney, Cheryl A.; Lowry, David R.; Becker, Diane M.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 114, No. 9, 01.05.1991, p. 741-747.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bachorik, PS, Cloey, TA, Finney, CA, Lowry, DR & Becker, DM 1991, 'Lipoprotein-cholesterol analysis during screening: Accuracy and reliability', Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 114, no. 9, pp. 741-747.
Bachorik, Paul S. ; Cloey, Teresa A. ; Finney, Cheryl A. ; Lowry, David R. ; Becker, Diane M. / Lipoprotein-cholesterol analysis during screening : Accuracy and reliability. In: Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991 ; Vol. 114, No. 9. pp. 741-747.
@article{dde676cf5aed4342a7d34861f21c95cb,
title = "Lipoprotein-cholesterol analysis during screening: Accuracy and reliability",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of lipoproteincholesterol measurements obtained during screening. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: From November 1989 to January 1990, 154 adults were screened. Measurements: Split venous samples from fasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-densitylipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with screening and standardized laboratory methods. Low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels were calculated using the Friedewald equation. Split venous samples from nonfasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol. Capillary blood samples were analyzed for total cholesterol with the screening method. Main Results: Total cholesterol measurements in screening venous blood samples were 5.4{\%} and 3.8{\%} lower than the laboratory values in samples from fasting and nonfasting participants, respectively. Triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol values in venous samples obtained from fasting participants were, on average, 9.8{\%} and 11.2{\%} lower than the respective laboratory measurements. Screening HDL-cholesterol values varied, differing from the laboratory values by as much as 40{\%} in 95{\%} of participants. In fasting participants, total cholesterol in capillary samples averaged 5.5{\%} higher than in venous samples; in nonfasting participants the capillary samples were 3.1{\%} higher. Screening for either total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol identified 93{\%} of the persons with LDL-cholesterol values of 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) or higher. Conclusions: Total cholesterol can be reliably measured in samples from fasting or nonfasting persons. The values in capillary blood samples were slightly higher than those in venous samples. Screening HDL-cholesterol values were too variable to establish the HDL-cholesterol level reliably. Participants with high LDL-cholesterol levels were identified as accurately by measuring total cholesterol only when compared with calculating the LDL-cholesterol level from total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL-cholesterol concentrations.",
author = "Bachorik, {Paul S.} and Cloey, {Teresa A.} and Finney, {Cheryl A.} and Lowry, {David R.} and Becker, {Diane M}",
year = "1991",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "741--747",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lipoprotein-cholesterol analysis during screening

T2 - Accuracy and reliability

AU - Bachorik, Paul S.

AU - Cloey, Teresa A.

AU - Finney, Cheryl A.

AU - Lowry, David R.

AU - Becker, Diane M

PY - 1991/5/1

Y1 - 1991/5/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of lipoproteincholesterol measurements obtained during screening. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: From November 1989 to January 1990, 154 adults were screened. Measurements: Split venous samples from fasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-densitylipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with screening and standardized laboratory methods. Low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels were calculated using the Friedewald equation. Split venous samples from nonfasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol. Capillary blood samples were analyzed for total cholesterol with the screening method. Main Results: Total cholesterol measurements in screening venous blood samples were 5.4% and 3.8% lower than the laboratory values in samples from fasting and nonfasting participants, respectively. Triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol values in venous samples obtained from fasting participants were, on average, 9.8% and 11.2% lower than the respective laboratory measurements. Screening HDL-cholesterol values varied, differing from the laboratory values by as much as 40% in 95% of participants. In fasting participants, total cholesterol in capillary samples averaged 5.5% higher than in venous samples; in nonfasting participants the capillary samples were 3.1% higher. Screening for either total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol identified 93% of the persons with LDL-cholesterol values of 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) or higher. Conclusions: Total cholesterol can be reliably measured in samples from fasting or nonfasting persons. The values in capillary blood samples were slightly higher than those in venous samples. Screening HDL-cholesterol values were too variable to establish the HDL-cholesterol level reliably. Participants with high LDL-cholesterol levels were identified as accurately by measuring total cholesterol only when compared with calculating the LDL-cholesterol level from total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL-cholesterol concentrations.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of lipoproteincholesterol measurements obtained during screening. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: From November 1989 to January 1990, 154 adults were screened. Measurements: Split venous samples from fasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-densitylipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with screening and standardized laboratory methods. Low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels were calculated using the Friedewald equation. Split venous samples from nonfasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol. Capillary blood samples were analyzed for total cholesterol with the screening method. Main Results: Total cholesterol measurements in screening venous blood samples were 5.4% and 3.8% lower than the laboratory values in samples from fasting and nonfasting participants, respectively. Triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol values in venous samples obtained from fasting participants were, on average, 9.8% and 11.2% lower than the respective laboratory measurements. Screening HDL-cholesterol values varied, differing from the laboratory values by as much as 40% in 95% of participants. In fasting participants, total cholesterol in capillary samples averaged 5.5% higher than in venous samples; in nonfasting participants the capillary samples were 3.1% higher. Screening for either total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol identified 93% of the persons with LDL-cholesterol values of 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) or higher. Conclusions: Total cholesterol can be reliably measured in samples from fasting or nonfasting persons. The values in capillary blood samples were slightly higher than those in venous samples. Screening HDL-cholesterol values were too variable to establish the HDL-cholesterol level reliably. Participants with high LDL-cholesterol levels were identified as accurately by measuring total cholesterol only when compared with calculating the LDL-cholesterol level from total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL-cholesterol concentrations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025907861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025907861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2012356

AN - SCOPUS:0025907861

VL - 114

SP - 741

EP - 747

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 9

ER -