Life and death choices after Cruzan: case law and standards of professional conduct.

L. Gostin, R. F. Weir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Medical practitioners often feel obligated to use all available procedures to sustain patients' lives. A review of case law indicates, however, that practitioners who abate treatment that is contrary to people's known preferences or current best interests act legally and in accordance with the highest professional standards. In the case of Nancy Cruzan, the Supreme Court delegated to the states the determination whether to respect the rights of nonautonomous patients to die with dignity. States should enact creative laws to encourage families and physicians to discuss final care, and assist people in making clear and simple statements about their preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-173
Number of pages31
JournalThe Milbank quarterly
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this