Level of agreement between DIS and UM-CIDI alcohol and marijuana use disorders

Implications for research

Howard D. Chilcoat, Victoria C. Lucia, Naomi Breslau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

By and large, recent epidemiological investigations of alcohol and drug use disorders are based on structured interviews, such as the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), which are designed to be administered by trained lay interviewers. Little is known about the level of agreement between these instruments. To fill this gap, we compared responses from: 971 young adults from an epidemiological sample, who were administered both the DIS and the University of Michigan CIDI (UM'CIDl) in the same interview session. Level of agreement was estimated for responses to individual items, and for DSM-IIIR abuse/dependence (A/D) diagnoses and symptoms for alcohol and marijuana. DIS/UM-CIDI agreement for drug use disorders in the year preceding the interview was moderate for each disorder (alcohol A/D, kappa - 0.58; marijuana A/D, kappa = 0.68), although one-year prevalences of alcohol and marijuana AID were approximately 40% higher for the DIS compared to the UM-CIDI. Despite the discrepancies, levels of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders and associations with risk factors were similar for the DIS and LM-CIDI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-101
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Volume8
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cannabis
Appointments and Schedules
Alcohols
Interviews
Research
Marijuana Abuse
Alcoholism
Substance-Related Disorders
Psychiatry
Comorbidity
Young Adult

Keywords

  • Agreement
  • Comorbidity
  • DIS
  • Interview
  • UM-CIDI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Level of agreement between DIS and UM-CIDI alcohol and marijuana use disorders : Implications for research. / Chilcoat, Howard D.; Lucia, Victoria C.; Breslau, Naomi.

In: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1999, p. 83-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55d0d9197c3240968d671bcdb836222a,
title = "Level of agreement between DIS and UM-CIDI alcohol and marijuana use disorders: Implications for research",
abstract = "By and large, recent epidemiological investigations of alcohol and drug use disorders are based on structured interviews, such as the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), which are designed to be administered by trained lay interviewers. Little is known about the level of agreement between these instruments. To fill this gap, we compared responses from: 971 young adults from an epidemiological sample, who were administered both the DIS and the University of Michigan CIDI (UM'CIDl) in the same interview session. Level of agreement was estimated for responses to individual items, and for DSM-IIIR abuse/dependence (A/D) diagnoses and symptoms for alcohol and marijuana. DIS/UM-CIDI agreement for drug use disorders in the year preceding the interview was moderate for each disorder (alcohol A/D, kappa - 0.58; marijuana A/D, kappa = 0.68), although one-year prevalences of alcohol and marijuana AID were approximately 40{\%} higher for the DIS compared to the UM-CIDI. Despite the discrepancies, levels of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders and associations with risk factors were similar for the DIS and LM-CIDI.",
keywords = "Agreement, Comorbidity, DIS, Interview, UM-CIDI",
author = "Chilcoat, {Howard D.} and Lucia, {Victoria C.} and Naomi Breslau",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "83--101",
journal = "International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research",
issn = "1049-8931",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Level of agreement between DIS and UM-CIDI alcohol and marijuana use disorders

T2 - Implications for research

AU - Chilcoat, Howard D.

AU - Lucia, Victoria C.

AU - Breslau, Naomi

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - By and large, recent epidemiological investigations of alcohol and drug use disorders are based on structured interviews, such as the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), which are designed to be administered by trained lay interviewers. Little is known about the level of agreement between these instruments. To fill this gap, we compared responses from: 971 young adults from an epidemiological sample, who were administered both the DIS and the University of Michigan CIDI (UM'CIDl) in the same interview session. Level of agreement was estimated for responses to individual items, and for DSM-IIIR abuse/dependence (A/D) diagnoses and symptoms for alcohol and marijuana. DIS/UM-CIDI agreement for drug use disorders in the year preceding the interview was moderate for each disorder (alcohol A/D, kappa - 0.58; marijuana A/D, kappa = 0.68), although one-year prevalences of alcohol and marijuana AID were approximately 40% higher for the DIS compared to the UM-CIDI. Despite the discrepancies, levels of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders and associations with risk factors were similar for the DIS and LM-CIDI.

AB - By and large, recent epidemiological investigations of alcohol and drug use disorders are based on structured interviews, such as the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), which are designed to be administered by trained lay interviewers. Little is known about the level of agreement between these instruments. To fill this gap, we compared responses from: 971 young adults from an epidemiological sample, who were administered both the DIS and the University of Michigan CIDI (UM'CIDl) in the same interview session. Level of agreement was estimated for responses to individual items, and for DSM-IIIR abuse/dependence (A/D) diagnoses and symptoms for alcohol and marijuana. DIS/UM-CIDI agreement for drug use disorders in the year preceding the interview was moderate for each disorder (alcohol A/D, kappa - 0.58; marijuana A/D, kappa = 0.68), although one-year prevalences of alcohol and marijuana AID were approximately 40% higher for the DIS compared to the UM-CIDI. Despite the discrepancies, levels of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders and associations with risk factors were similar for the DIS and LM-CIDI.

KW - Agreement

KW - Comorbidity

KW - DIS

KW - Interview

KW - UM-CIDI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542669468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542669468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 83

EP - 101

JO - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

JF - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

SN - 1049-8931

IS - 2

ER -