TY - JOUR
T1 - Letters of recommendation for pediatric surgery fellowship
T2 - Analysis of linguistic differences based on gender of the applicant
AU - Bludevich, Bryce
AU - Irby, Iris
AU - Chang, Henry
AU - Danielson, Paul D.
AU - Gonzalez, Raquel
AU - Snyder, Christopher W.
AU - Chandler, Nicole M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding sources : This study was supported in part by the Frank and Dorothy Szafer Dunn Surgical Oncology Research Fund
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Background:: Gender bias in letters of recommendation (LOR) has been reported for candidate selection in academic medicine, typically with females frequently described with communal terms (e.g. helpful, kind, interpersonal) and males described more with agentic terms (e.g. assertive, intellectual, ambitious). This study examined the presence of linguistic gender differences in LOR for Pediatric Surgery Fellowship. Methods:: LOR submitted to a single pediatric surgery fellowship program between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using a previously validated Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Software (LIWC) program. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were employed in our analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models were built to assess independent association of LIWC variables with applicant gender, LOR writer gender, and applicant-writer gender concordance. Results:: 1264 LOR from 325 applicants (51% female) were analyzed. Of the letter writers, 83% were male, 57% were professors, and 7.6% were Pediatric Surgery Fellowship Program Directors. The overall median average word count was 518 words, with no significant difference in LOR word count between applicant genders. Compared to male applicants, female applicants were described significantly more with work words (e.g. excellent, work; p = 0.04). Male LOR writers used authentic words (e.g. honest, humble; p = 0.006) and home words (e.g. family, house; p = 0.04) significantly more than female LOR writers. There were no significant differences in the use of agentic and communal words between genders. Conclusion:: While there are linguistic differences in LOR for candidates in the Pediatric Surgery match based on gender, previously described overt gender bias was not seen in this study. Interestingly, female candidates were described more with work words, like excellent; a reversal of previously described gender bias in academic medicine. These findings may be due to the unique interpersonal and multidisciplinary skills required in pediatric surgery and may represent a unique form of gender bias that warrants further study.
AB - Background:: Gender bias in letters of recommendation (LOR) has been reported for candidate selection in academic medicine, typically with females frequently described with communal terms (e.g. helpful, kind, interpersonal) and males described more with agentic terms (e.g. assertive, intellectual, ambitious). This study examined the presence of linguistic gender differences in LOR for Pediatric Surgery Fellowship. Methods:: LOR submitted to a single pediatric surgery fellowship program between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using a previously validated Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Software (LIWC) program. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were employed in our analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models were built to assess independent association of LIWC variables with applicant gender, LOR writer gender, and applicant-writer gender concordance. Results:: 1264 LOR from 325 applicants (51% female) were analyzed. Of the letter writers, 83% were male, 57% were professors, and 7.6% were Pediatric Surgery Fellowship Program Directors. The overall median average word count was 518 words, with no significant difference in LOR word count between applicant genders. Compared to male applicants, female applicants were described significantly more with work words (e.g. excellent, work; p = 0.04). Male LOR writers used authentic words (e.g. honest, humble; p = 0.006) and home words (e.g. family, house; p = 0.04) significantly more than female LOR writers. There were no significant differences in the use of agentic and communal words between genders. Conclusion:: While there are linguistic differences in LOR for candidates in the Pediatric Surgery match based on gender, previously described overt gender bias was not seen in this study. Interestingly, female candidates were described more with work words, like excellent; a reversal of previously described gender bias in academic medicine. These findings may be due to the unique interpersonal and multidisciplinary skills required in pediatric surgery and may represent a unique form of gender bias that warrants further study.
KW - Fellowship Match
KW - Gender
KW - Keywords
KW - Level III
KW - Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Software
KW - Pediatric Surgery
KW - Retrospective Review
KW - fellowship training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106333701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106333701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.02.049
DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.02.049
M3 - Article
C2 - 33785201
AN - SCOPUS:85106333701
SN - 0022-3468
VL - 56
SP - 1299
EP - 1304
JO - Journal of pediatric surgery
JF - Journal of pediatric surgery
IS - 8
ER -