Lessons learned from the data analysis of the second harvest (1998-2001) of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database

Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs, Constantine Mavroudis, Marshall L Jacobs, Francois G. Lacour-Gayet, Christo I. Tchervenkov, J. William Gaynor, David Robinson Clarke, Thomas L. Spray, Bohdan Maruszewski, Giovanni Stellin, Martin J. Elliott, Rachel S. Dokholyan, Eric D. Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The analysis of the second harvest of the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database produced meaningful outcome data and several critical lessons relevant to congenital heart surgery outcomes analysis worldwide. Methods: This data harvest represents the first STS multi-institutional experience with software utilizing the nomenclature and database requirements adopted by the STS and EACTS (April 2000 Annals of Thoracic Surgery). Members of the STS Congenital Heart Committee analyzed the STS data. Results: This STS harvest includes data from 16 centers (12787 cases, 2881 neonates, 4124 infants). In 2002, the EACTS reported similar outcome data utilizing the same database definitions (41 centers, 12736 cases, 2245 neonates, 4195 infants). Lessons from the analysis include: (1) Death must be clearly defined. (2) The Primary Procedure in a given operation must be documented. (3) Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for all diagnoses and procedures must be agreed upon. (4) Missing data values remain an issue for the database. (5) Generic terms in the nomenclature lists, that is terms ending in Not Otherwise Specified (NOS), are redundant and decrease the clarity of data analysis. (6) Methodology needs to be developed and implemented to assure and verify data completeness and data accuracy. 'Operative Mortality' and 'Mortality Assigned to this Operation' were defined by the STS and EACTS; these definitions were not utilized uniformly. 'Thirty Day Mortality' was problematic because some centers did not track mortality after hospital discharge. Only 'Mortality Prior to Discharge' was consistently reported. Designation of Primary Procedure for a given operation determines its location for analysis. Until Complexity Scores lead to automated methodology for choosing the Primary Procedure, the surgeon must designate the Primary Procedure. Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for all diagnoses and procedures have been developed in an effort to define acceptable concomitant diagnoses and procedures for each analysis. Improvements in data completeness can be achieved using a variety of techniques including developing more functional techniques of data entry at individual institutions and software improvements. Future versions of the STS Congenital Database will request that the coding of diagnoses and procedures avoid the terms ending in NOS. Conclusions: Lessons from this data harvest should improve congenital heart surgery outcome analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)18-37
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thoracic Surgery
Databases
Thorax
Mortality
Terminology
Software
Newborn Infant
Surgeons
Hospital Mortality

Keywords

  • Congenital heart surgery database
  • Congenital heart surgery outcomes analysis
  • Database
  • Nomenclature
  • Outcomes analysis
  • Society of thoracic surgeons database

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Lessons learned from the data analysis of the second harvest (1998-2001) of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database. / Jacobs, Jeffrey Phillip; Mavroudis, Constantine; Jacobs, Marshall L; Lacour-Gayet, Francois G.; Tchervenkov, Christo I.; Gaynor, J. William; Clarke, David Robinson; Spray, Thomas L.; Maruszewski, Bohdan; Stellin, Giovanni; Elliott, Martin J.; Dokholyan, Rachel S.; Peterson, Eric D.

In: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Vol. 26, No. 1, 07.2004, p. 18-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jacobs, JP, Mavroudis, C, Jacobs, ML, Lacour-Gayet, FG, Tchervenkov, CI, Gaynor, JW, Clarke, DR, Spray, TL, Maruszewski, B, Stellin, G, Elliott, MJ, Dokholyan, RS & Peterson, ED 2004, 'Lessons learned from the data analysis of the second harvest (1998-2001) of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database', European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.03.048
Jacobs, Jeffrey Phillip ; Mavroudis, Constantine ; Jacobs, Marshall L ; Lacour-Gayet, Francois G. ; Tchervenkov, Christo I. ; Gaynor, J. William ; Clarke, David Robinson ; Spray, Thomas L. ; Maruszewski, Bohdan ; Stellin, Giovanni ; Elliott, Martin J. ; Dokholyan, Rachel S. ; Peterson, Eric D. / Lessons learned from the data analysis of the second harvest (1998-2001) of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database. In: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2004 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 18-37.
@article{f144949ce9794693b7666c0f64a137f3,
title = "Lessons learned from the data analysis of the second harvest (1998-2001) of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database",
abstract = "Objective: The analysis of the second harvest of the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database produced meaningful outcome data and several critical lessons relevant to congenital heart surgery outcomes analysis worldwide. Methods: This data harvest represents the first STS multi-institutional experience with software utilizing the nomenclature and database requirements adopted by the STS and EACTS (April 2000 Annals of Thoracic Surgery). Members of the STS Congenital Heart Committee analyzed the STS data. Results: This STS harvest includes data from 16 centers (12787 cases, 2881 neonates, 4124 infants). In 2002, the EACTS reported similar outcome data utilizing the same database definitions (41 centers, 12736 cases, 2245 neonates, 4195 infants). Lessons from the analysis include: (1) Death must be clearly defined. (2) The Primary Procedure in a given operation must be documented. (3) Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for all diagnoses and procedures must be agreed upon. (4) Missing data values remain an issue for the database. (5) Generic terms in the nomenclature lists, that is terms ending in Not Otherwise Specified (NOS), are redundant and decrease the clarity of data analysis. (6) Methodology needs to be developed and implemented to assure and verify data completeness and data accuracy. 'Operative Mortality' and 'Mortality Assigned to this Operation' were defined by the STS and EACTS; these definitions were not utilized uniformly. 'Thirty Day Mortality' was problematic because some centers did not track mortality after hospital discharge. Only 'Mortality Prior to Discharge' was consistently reported. Designation of Primary Procedure for a given operation determines its location for analysis. Until Complexity Scores lead to automated methodology for choosing the Primary Procedure, the surgeon must designate the Primary Procedure. Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for all diagnoses and procedures have been developed in an effort to define acceptable concomitant diagnoses and procedures for each analysis. Improvements in data completeness can be achieved using a variety of techniques including developing more functional techniques of data entry at individual institutions and software improvements. Future versions of the STS Congenital Database will request that the coding of diagnoses and procedures avoid the terms ending in NOS. Conclusions: Lessons from this data harvest should improve congenital heart surgery outcome analysis.",
keywords = "Congenital heart surgery database, Congenital heart surgery outcomes analysis, Database, Nomenclature, Outcomes analysis, Society of thoracic surgeons database",
author = "Jacobs, {Jeffrey Phillip} and Constantine Mavroudis and Jacobs, {Marshall L} and Lacour-Gayet, {Francois G.} and Tchervenkov, {Christo I.} and Gaynor, {J. William} and Clarke, {David Robinson} and Spray, {Thomas L.} and Bohdan Maruszewski and Giovanni Stellin and Elliott, {Martin J.} and Dokholyan, {Rachel S.} and Peterson, {Eric D.}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.03.048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "18--37",
journal = "European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery",
issn = "1010-7940",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lessons learned from the data analysis of the second harvest (1998-2001) of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database

AU - Jacobs, Jeffrey Phillip

AU - Mavroudis, Constantine

AU - Jacobs, Marshall L

AU - Lacour-Gayet, Francois G.

AU - Tchervenkov, Christo I.

AU - Gaynor, J. William

AU - Clarke, David Robinson

AU - Spray, Thomas L.

AU - Maruszewski, Bohdan

AU - Stellin, Giovanni

AU - Elliott, Martin J.

AU - Dokholyan, Rachel S.

AU - Peterson, Eric D.

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Objective: The analysis of the second harvest of the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database produced meaningful outcome data and several critical lessons relevant to congenital heart surgery outcomes analysis worldwide. Methods: This data harvest represents the first STS multi-institutional experience with software utilizing the nomenclature and database requirements adopted by the STS and EACTS (April 2000 Annals of Thoracic Surgery). Members of the STS Congenital Heart Committee analyzed the STS data. Results: This STS harvest includes data from 16 centers (12787 cases, 2881 neonates, 4124 infants). In 2002, the EACTS reported similar outcome data utilizing the same database definitions (41 centers, 12736 cases, 2245 neonates, 4195 infants). Lessons from the analysis include: (1) Death must be clearly defined. (2) The Primary Procedure in a given operation must be documented. (3) Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for all diagnoses and procedures must be agreed upon. (4) Missing data values remain an issue for the database. (5) Generic terms in the nomenclature lists, that is terms ending in Not Otherwise Specified (NOS), are redundant and decrease the clarity of data analysis. (6) Methodology needs to be developed and implemented to assure and verify data completeness and data accuracy. 'Operative Mortality' and 'Mortality Assigned to this Operation' were defined by the STS and EACTS; these definitions were not utilized uniformly. 'Thirty Day Mortality' was problematic because some centers did not track mortality after hospital discharge. Only 'Mortality Prior to Discharge' was consistently reported. Designation of Primary Procedure for a given operation determines its location for analysis. Until Complexity Scores lead to automated methodology for choosing the Primary Procedure, the surgeon must designate the Primary Procedure. Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for all diagnoses and procedures have been developed in an effort to define acceptable concomitant diagnoses and procedures for each analysis. Improvements in data completeness can be achieved using a variety of techniques including developing more functional techniques of data entry at individual institutions and software improvements. Future versions of the STS Congenital Database will request that the coding of diagnoses and procedures avoid the terms ending in NOS. Conclusions: Lessons from this data harvest should improve congenital heart surgery outcome analysis.

AB - Objective: The analysis of the second harvest of the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database produced meaningful outcome data and several critical lessons relevant to congenital heart surgery outcomes analysis worldwide. Methods: This data harvest represents the first STS multi-institutional experience with software utilizing the nomenclature and database requirements adopted by the STS and EACTS (April 2000 Annals of Thoracic Surgery). Members of the STS Congenital Heart Committee analyzed the STS data. Results: This STS harvest includes data from 16 centers (12787 cases, 2881 neonates, 4124 infants). In 2002, the EACTS reported similar outcome data utilizing the same database definitions (41 centers, 12736 cases, 2245 neonates, 4195 infants). Lessons from the analysis include: (1) Death must be clearly defined. (2) The Primary Procedure in a given operation must be documented. (3) Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for all diagnoses and procedures must be agreed upon. (4) Missing data values remain an issue for the database. (5) Generic terms in the nomenclature lists, that is terms ending in Not Otherwise Specified (NOS), are redundant and decrease the clarity of data analysis. (6) Methodology needs to be developed and implemented to assure and verify data completeness and data accuracy. 'Operative Mortality' and 'Mortality Assigned to this Operation' were defined by the STS and EACTS; these definitions were not utilized uniformly. 'Thirty Day Mortality' was problematic because some centers did not track mortality after hospital discharge. Only 'Mortality Prior to Discharge' was consistently reported. Designation of Primary Procedure for a given operation determines its location for analysis. Until Complexity Scores lead to automated methodology for choosing the Primary Procedure, the surgeon must designate the Primary Procedure. Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for all diagnoses and procedures have been developed in an effort to define acceptable concomitant diagnoses and procedures for each analysis. Improvements in data completeness can be achieved using a variety of techniques including developing more functional techniques of data entry at individual institutions and software improvements. Future versions of the STS Congenital Database will request that the coding of diagnoses and procedures avoid the terms ending in NOS. Conclusions: Lessons from this data harvest should improve congenital heart surgery outcome analysis.

KW - Congenital heart surgery database

KW - Congenital heart surgery outcomes analysis

KW - Database

KW - Nomenclature

KW - Outcomes analysis

KW - Society of thoracic surgeons database

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942564594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942564594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.03.048

DO - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.03.048

M3 - Article

C2 - 15200976

AN - SCOPUS:2942564594

VL - 26

SP - 18

EP - 37

JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

SN - 1010-7940

IS - 1

ER -