Lessons learned from newborn screening for critical congenital heart defects

Matthew E. Oster, Susan W. Aucott, Jill Glidewell, Jesse Hackell, Lazaros Kochilas, Gerard R. Martin, Julia Phillippi, Nelangi M. Pinto, Annamarie Saarinen, Marci Sontag, Alex R. Kemper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

Newborn screening for critical congenital heart defects (CCHD) was added to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2011. Within 4 years, 46 states and the District of Columbia had adopted it into their newborn screening program, leading to CCHD screening being nearly universal in the United States. This rapid adoption occurred while there were still questions about the effectiveness of the recommended screening protocol and barriers to follow-up for infants with a positive screen. In response, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention partnered with the American Academy of Pediatrics to convene an expert panel between January and September 2015 representing a broad array of primary care, neonatology, pediatric cardiology, nursing, midwifery, public health, and advocacy communities. The panel's goal was to review current practices in newborn screening for CCHD and to identify opportunities for improvement. In this article, we describe the experience of CCHD screening in the United States with regard to: (1) identifying the target lesions for CCHD screening; (2) optimizing the algorithm for screening; (3) determining state-level challenges to implementation and surveillance of CCHD; (4) educating all stakeholders; (5) performing screening using the proper equipment and in a cost-effective manner; and (6) implementing screening in special settings such as the NICU, out-of-hospital settings, and areas of high altitude.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere20154573
JournalPediatrics
Volume137
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lessons learned from newborn screening for critical congenital heart defects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this