Less is more: Does the addition of barrel staves improve results in endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis?

Benjamin C. Wood, Edward S. Ahn, Joanna Y. Wang, Albert K. Oh, Robert F. Keating, Gary F. Rogers, Suresh N. Magge

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) with postoperative helmet orthosis is a well-established treatment option for sagittal craniosynostosis. There are many technical variations to the surgery ranging from simple strip craniectomy to methods that employ multiple cranial osteotomies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of lateral barrel-stave osteotomies during ESC improved morphological outcomes. METHODS An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted on a consecutive series of cases involving ESC for sagittal craniosynostosis at 2 different institutions from March 2008 to August 2014. The patients in Group A underwent ESC and those in Group B had ESC with lateral barrel-stave osteotomies. Demographic and perioperative data were recorded; postoperative morphological outcomes were analyzed using 3D laser scan data acquired from a single orthotic manufacturer who managed patients from both institutions. RESULTS A total of 73 patients were included (34 in Group A and 39 in Group B). Compared with Group B patients, Group A patients had a shorter mean anesthetic time (161.7 vs 195 minutes; p < 0.01) and operative time (71.6 vs 111 minutes; p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was similar for the 2 groups (1.2 days for Group A vs 1.4 days for Group B; p = 0.1). Adequate postoperative data on morphological outcomes were reported by the orthotic manufacturer for 65 patients (29 in Group A and 36 in Group B). The 2 groups had similar improvement in the cephalic index (CI): Group A, mean change 10.5% (mean preoperative CI 72.6, final 80.4) at a mean follow-up of 13.2 months; Group B, mean change 12.2% (mean preoperative CI 71.0, final 79.6) at a mean follow-up of 19.4 months. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Both ESC alone and ESC with barrel staving produced excellent outcomes. However, the addition of barrel staves did not improve the results and, therefore, may not be warranted in the endoscopic treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages86-90
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Craniosynostoses
Osteotomy
Head
Therapeutics
Head Protective Devices
Orthotic Devices
Research Ethics Committees
Operative Time
Anesthetics
Length of Stay
Lasers
Demography

Keywords

  • Barrel stave
  • Craniofacial
  • Endoscopic strip craniectomy
  • Sagittal craniosynostosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Less is more : Does the addition of barrel staves improve results in endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis? / Wood, Benjamin C.; Ahn, Edward S.; Wang, Joanna Y.; Oh, Albert K.; Keating, Robert F.; Rogers, Gary F.; Magge, Suresh N.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.07.2017, p. 86-90.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Wood, Benjamin C. ; Ahn, Edward S. ; Wang, Joanna Y. ; Oh, Albert K. ; Keating, Robert F. ; Rogers, Gary F. ; Magge, Suresh N./ Less is more : Does the addition of barrel staves improve results in endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis?. In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2017 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 86-90
@article{74633fa97042406eb28d36322bfc0a31,
title = "Less is more: Does the addition of barrel staves improve results in endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) with postoperative helmet orthosis is a well-established treatment option for sagittal craniosynostosis. There are many technical variations to the surgery ranging from simple strip craniectomy to methods that employ multiple cranial osteotomies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of lateral barrel-stave osteotomies during ESC improved morphological outcomes. METHODS An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted on a consecutive series of cases involving ESC for sagittal craniosynostosis at 2 different institutions from March 2008 to August 2014. The patients in Group A underwent ESC and those in Group B had ESC with lateral barrel-stave osteotomies. Demographic and perioperative data were recorded; postoperative morphological outcomes were analyzed using 3D laser scan data acquired from a single orthotic manufacturer who managed patients from both institutions. RESULTS A total of 73 patients were included (34 in Group A and 39 in Group B). Compared with Group B patients, Group A patients had a shorter mean anesthetic time (161.7 vs 195 minutes; p < 0.01) and operative time (71.6 vs 111 minutes; p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was similar for the 2 groups (1.2 days for Group A vs 1.4 days for Group B; p = 0.1). Adequate postoperative data on morphological outcomes were reported by the orthotic manufacturer for 65 patients (29 in Group A and 36 in Group B). The 2 groups had similar improvement in the cephalic index (CI): Group A, mean change 10.5% (mean preoperative CI 72.6, final 80.4) at a mean follow-up of 13.2 months; Group B, mean change 12.2% (mean preoperative CI 71.0, final 79.6) at a mean follow-up of 19.4 months. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Both ESC alone and ESC with barrel staving produced excellent outcomes. However, the addition of barrel staves did not improve the results and, therefore, may not be warranted in the endoscopic treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis.",
keywords = "Barrel stave, Craniofacial, Endoscopic strip craniectomy, Sagittal craniosynostosis",
author = "Wood, {Benjamin C.} and Ahn, {Edward S.} and Wang, {Joanna Y.} and Oh, {Albert K.} and Keating, {Robert F.} and Rogers, {Gary F.} and Magge, {Suresh N.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.3171/2017.1.PEDS16478",
volume = "20",
pages = "86--90",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics",
issn = "1933-0707",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Less is more

T2 - Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

AU - Wood,Benjamin C.

AU - Ahn,Edward S.

AU - Wang,Joanna Y.

AU - Oh,Albert K.

AU - Keating,Robert F.

AU - Rogers,Gary F.

AU - Magge,Suresh N.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) with postoperative helmet orthosis is a well-established treatment option for sagittal craniosynostosis. There are many technical variations to the surgery ranging from simple strip craniectomy to methods that employ multiple cranial osteotomies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of lateral barrel-stave osteotomies during ESC improved morphological outcomes. METHODS An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted on a consecutive series of cases involving ESC for sagittal craniosynostosis at 2 different institutions from March 2008 to August 2014. The patients in Group A underwent ESC and those in Group B had ESC with lateral barrel-stave osteotomies. Demographic and perioperative data were recorded; postoperative morphological outcomes were analyzed using 3D laser scan data acquired from a single orthotic manufacturer who managed patients from both institutions. RESULTS A total of 73 patients were included (34 in Group A and 39 in Group B). Compared with Group B patients, Group A patients had a shorter mean anesthetic time (161.7 vs 195 minutes; p < 0.01) and operative time (71.6 vs 111 minutes; p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was similar for the 2 groups (1.2 days for Group A vs 1.4 days for Group B; p = 0.1). Adequate postoperative data on morphological outcomes were reported by the orthotic manufacturer for 65 patients (29 in Group A and 36 in Group B). The 2 groups had similar improvement in the cephalic index (CI): Group A, mean change 10.5% (mean preoperative CI 72.6, final 80.4) at a mean follow-up of 13.2 months; Group B, mean change 12.2% (mean preoperative CI 71.0, final 79.6) at a mean follow-up of 19.4 months. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Both ESC alone and ESC with barrel staving produced excellent outcomes. However, the addition of barrel staves did not improve the results and, therefore, may not be warranted in the endoscopic treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis.

AB - OBJECTIVE Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) with postoperative helmet orthosis is a well-established treatment option for sagittal craniosynostosis. There are many technical variations to the surgery ranging from simple strip craniectomy to methods that employ multiple cranial osteotomies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of lateral barrel-stave osteotomies during ESC improved morphological outcomes. METHODS An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted on a consecutive series of cases involving ESC for sagittal craniosynostosis at 2 different institutions from March 2008 to August 2014. The patients in Group A underwent ESC and those in Group B had ESC with lateral barrel-stave osteotomies. Demographic and perioperative data were recorded; postoperative morphological outcomes were analyzed using 3D laser scan data acquired from a single orthotic manufacturer who managed patients from both institutions. RESULTS A total of 73 patients were included (34 in Group A and 39 in Group B). Compared with Group B patients, Group A patients had a shorter mean anesthetic time (161.7 vs 195 minutes; p < 0.01) and operative time (71.6 vs 111 minutes; p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was similar for the 2 groups (1.2 days for Group A vs 1.4 days for Group B; p = 0.1). Adequate postoperative data on morphological outcomes were reported by the orthotic manufacturer for 65 patients (29 in Group A and 36 in Group B). The 2 groups had similar improvement in the cephalic index (CI): Group A, mean change 10.5% (mean preoperative CI 72.6, final 80.4) at a mean follow-up of 13.2 months; Group B, mean change 12.2% (mean preoperative CI 71.0, final 79.6) at a mean follow-up of 19.4 months. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Both ESC alone and ESC with barrel staving produced excellent outcomes. However, the addition of barrel staves did not improve the results and, therefore, may not be warranted in the endoscopic treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis.

KW - Barrel stave

KW - Craniofacial

KW - Endoscopic strip craniectomy

KW - Sagittal craniosynostosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021815006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021815006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2017.1.PEDS16478

DO - 10.3171/2017.1.PEDS16478

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 86

EP - 90

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

SN - 1933-0707

IS - 1

ER -