Legal Implications of Prostate Cancer Screening

C. J. Stimson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The prostate cancer screening debate has implications beyond the clinical exchange between physicians and their patients. The formalization of contradictory expert medical opinion and data interpretation into highly visible clinical practice guidelines opens the door for medical malpractice claims alleging negligent prostate cancer screening practices. This chapter highlights the current guidelines for prostate cancer screening, details the guideline development process, and investigates the role of these guidelines in medical malpractice law. This in-depth review of medical malpractice jurisprudence finds that the courts are well suited to assimilate the prostate cancer screening debate and the affiliated guidelines into the negligence analysis. Specifically, expert medical witnesses relying on guidelines to articulate a standard of care are held to high evidentiary standards, and courts have well-established precedent allowing for consideration of multiple standards of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProstate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice: Second Edition
PublisherElsevier Inc.
Pages613-619
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)9780128000779
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 3 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Malpractice
Prostatic Neoplasms
Guidelines
Expert Testimony
Standard of Care
Jurisprudence
Practice Guidelines
Physicians

Keywords

  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Medical malpractice law
  • Negligence
  • Prostate cancer screening
  • Standard of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Stimson, C. J. (2015). Legal Implications of Prostate Cancer Screening. In Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice: Second Edition (pp. 613-619). Elsevier Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800077-9.00065-7

Legal Implications of Prostate Cancer Screening. / Stimson, C. J.

Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice: Second Edition. Elsevier Inc., 2015. p. 613-619.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Stimson, CJ 2015, Legal Implications of Prostate Cancer Screening. in Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice: Second Edition. Elsevier Inc., pp. 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800077-9.00065-7
Stimson CJ. Legal Implications of Prostate Cancer Screening. In Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice: Second Edition. Elsevier Inc. 2015. p. 613-619 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800077-9.00065-7
Stimson, C. J. / Legal Implications of Prostate Cancer Screening. Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice: Second Edition. Elsevier Inc., 2015. pp. 613-619
@inbook{a0d8724d8891447ea67deb0cf879a504,
title = "Legal Implications of Prostate Cancer Screening",
abstract = "The prostate cancer screening debate has implications beyond the clinical exchange between physicians and their patients. The formalization of contradictory expert medical opinion and data interpretation into highly visible clinical practice guidelines opens the door for medical malpractice claims alleging negligent prostate cancer screening practices. This chapter highlights the current guidelines for prostate cancer screening, details the guideline development process, and investigates the role of these guidelines in medical malpractice law. This in-depth review of medical malpractice jurisprudence finds that the courts are well suited to assimilate the prostate cancer screening debate and the affiliated guidelines into the negligence analysis. Specifically, expert medical witnesses relying on guidelines to articulate a standard of care are held to high evidentiary standards, and courts have well-established precedent allowing for consideration of multiple standards of care.",
keywords = "Clinical practice guidelines, Medical malpractice law, Negligence, Prostate cancer screening, Standard of care",
author = "Stimson, {C. J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-800077-9.00065-7",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780128000779",
pages = "613--619",
booktitle = "Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice: Second Edition",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Legal Implications of Prostate Cancer Screening

AU - Stimson, C. J.

PY - 2015/12/3

Y1 - 2015/12/3

N2 - The prostate cancer screening debate has implications beyond the clinical exchange between physicians and their patients. The formalization of contradictory expert medical opinion and data interpretation into highly visible clinical practice guidelines opens the door for medical malpractice claims alleging negligent prostate cancer screening practices. This chapter highlights the current guidelines for prostate cancer screening, details the guideline development process, and investigates the role of these guidelines in medical malpractice law. This in-depth review of medical malpractice jurisprudence finds that the courts are well suited to assimilate the prostate cancer screening debate and the affiliated guidelines into the negligence analysis. Specifically, expert medical witnesses relying on guidelines to articulate a standard of care are held to high evidentiary standards, and courts have well-established precedent allowing for consideration of multiple standards of care.

AB - The prostate cancer screening debate has implications beyond the clinical exchange between physicians and their patients. The formalization of contradictory expert medical opinion and data interpretation into highly visible clinical practice guidelines opens the door for medical malpractice claims alleging negligent prostate cancer screening practices. This chapter highlights the current guidelines for prostate cancer screening, details the guideline development process, and investigates the role of these guidelines in medical malpractice law. This in-depth review of medical malpractice jurisprudence finds that the courts are well suited to assimilate the prostate cancer screening debate and the affiliated guidelines into the negligence analysis. Specifically, expert medical witnesses relying on guidelines to articulate a standard of care are held to high evidentiary standards, and courts have well-established precedent allowing for consideration of multiple standards of care.

KW - Clinical practice guidelines

KW - Medical malpractice law

KW - Negligence

KW - Prostate cancer screening

KW - Standard of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84967222115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84967222115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-800077-9.00065-7

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-800077-9.00065-7

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84967222115

SN - 9780128000779

SP - 613

EP - 619

BT - Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice: Second Edition

PB - Elsevier Inc.

ER -