Learning processes affecting human decision making

An assessment of reinforcer-selective pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer following reinforcer devaluation

Melissa J. Allman, Iser G. DeLeon, Michael F Cataldo, Peter C Holland, Alexander W. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In reinforcer-selective transfer, Pavlovian stimuli that are predictive of specific outcomes bias performance toward responses associated with those outcomes. Although this phenomenon has been extensively examined in rodents, recent assessments have extended to humans. Using a stock market paradigm adults were trained to associate particular symbols and responses with particular currencies. During the first test, individuals showed a preference for responding on actions associated with the same outcome as that predicted by the presented stimulus (i.e., a reinforcer-selective transfer effect). In the second test of the experiment, one of the currencies was devalued. We found it notable that this served to reduce responses to those stimuli associated with the devalued currency. This finding is in contrast to that typically observed in rodent studies, and suggests that participants in this task represented the sensory features that differentiate the reinforcers and their value during reinforcer-selective transfer. These results are discussed in terms of implications for understanding associative learning processes in humans and the ability of reward-paired cues to direct adaptive and maladaptive behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)402-408
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

currency
decision making
Decision Making
rodents
learning
Learning
stock exchange
rodent
Rodentia
stock market
Aptitude
Psychological Adaptation
testing
Reward
Cues
Transfer (Psychology)
experiment
test

Keywords

  • Goal directed
  • Incentive learning
  • Motivation
  • Operant
  • Reward

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Learning processes affecting human decision making : An assessment of reinforcer-selective pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer following reinforcer devaluation. / Allman, Melissa J.; DeLeon, Iser G.; Cataldo, Michael F; Holland, Peter C; Johnson, Alexander W.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, Vol. 36, No. 3, 07.2010, p. 402-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{26da340f44814b019cfb137721d70343,
title = "Learning processes affecting human decision making: An assessment of reinforcer-selective pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer following reinforcer devaluation",
abstract = "In reinforcer-selective transfer, Pavlovian stimuli that are predictive of specific outcomes bias performance toward responses associated with those outcomes. Although this phenomenon has been extensively examined in rodents, recent assessments have extended to humans. Using a stock market paradigm adults were trained to associate particular symbols and responses with particular currencies. During the first test, individuals showed a preference for responding on actions associated with the same outcome as that predicted by the presented stimulus (i.e., a reinforcer-selective transfer effect). In the second test of the experiment, one of the currencies was devalued. We found it notable that this served to reduce responses to those stimuli associated with the devalued currency. This finding is in contrast to that typically observed in rodent studies, and suggests that participants in this task represented the sensory features that differentiate the reinforcers and their value during reinforcer-selective transfer. These results are discussed in terms of implications for understanding associative learning processes in humans and the ability of reward-paired cues to direct adaptive and maladaptive behavior.",
keywords = "Goal directed, Incentive learning, Motivation, Operant, Reward",
author = "Allman, {Melissa J.} and DeLeon, {Iser G.} and Cataldo, {Michael F} and Holland, {Peter C} and Johnson, {Alexander W.}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/a0017876",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "402--408",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes",
issn = "0097-7403",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning processes affecting human decision making

T2 - An assessment of reinforcer-selective pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer following reinforcer devaluation

AU - Allman, Melissa J.

AU - DeLeon, Iser G.

AU - Cataldo, Michael F

AU - Holland, Peter C

AU - Johnson, Alexander W.

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - In reinforcer-selective transfer, Pavlovian stimuli that are predictive of specific outcomes bias performance toward responses associated with those outcomes. Although this phenomenon has been extensively examined in rodents, recent assessments have extended to humans. Using a stock market paradigm adults were trained to associate particular symbols and responses with particular currencies. During the first test, individuals showed a preference for responding on actions associated with the same outcome as that predicted by the presented stimulus (i.e., a reinforcer-selective transfer effect). In the second test of the experiment, one of the currencies was devalued. We found it notable that this served to reduce responses to those stimuli associated with the devalued currency. This finding is in contrast to that typically observed in rodent studies, and suggests that participants in this task represented the sensory features that differentiate the reinforcers and their value during reinforcer-selective transfer. These results are discussed in terms of implications for understanding associative learning processes in humans and the ability of reward-paired cues to direct adaptive and maladaptive behavior.

AB - In reinforcer-selective transfer, Pavlovian stimuli that are predictive of specific outcomes bias performance toward responses associated with those outcomes. Although this phenomenon has been extensively examined in rodents, recent assessments have extended to humans. Using a stock market paradigm adults were trained to associate particular symbols and responses with particular currencies. During the first test, individuals showed a preference for responding on actions associated with the same outcome as that predicted by the presented stimulus (i.e., a reinforcer-selective transfer effect). In the second test of the experiment, one of the currencies was devalued. We found it notable that this served to reduce responses to those stimuli associated with the devalued currency. This finding is in contrast to that typically observed in rodent studies, and suggests that participants in this task represented the sensory features that differentiate the reinforcers and their value during reinforcer-selective transfer. These results are discussed in terms of implications for understanding associative learning processes in humans and the ability of reward-paired cues to direct adaptive and maladaptive behavior.

KW - Goal directed

KW - Incentive learning

KW - Motivation

KW - Operant

KW - Reward

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955338618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955338618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0017876

DO - 10.1037/a0017876

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 402

EP - 408

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

SN - 0097-7403

IS - 3

ER -