Learning Curve for Transoral Endoscopic Thyroid Lobectomy

Christopher R. Razavi, Elya Vasiliou, Ralph P Tufano, Jonathon Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To define the learning curve for transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via the vestibular approach (TOETVA). Study Design: Case series with planned data collection. Setting: Tertiary care academic hospital. Subjects and Methods: Included patients were those who met the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines for lobectomy and our group’s previously documented indications for TOETVA. Operative time (incision to closure) was used as a surrogate for procedural proficiency and plotted as a function of case number to determine a learning curve. A simple moving average of operative time was then calculated, with the proficiency case defined as the case number where the slope of this curve changed. Demographic/characteristic data, outcomes, and complications were compared between the skill acquisition period (case 1 to proficiency case) and the proficiency period (remaining cases). A linear regression model was then used to calculate and compare the slopes of the skill acquisition and proficiency periods in the “operative time versus case number” plot. Results: Thirty cases were attempted, with a procedural success rate of 29 of 30 (94%) and no incidence of permanent mental nerve or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. The proficiency case was case 11. There was a statistically significant difference between the skill acquisition and proficiency periods in slopes of the linear regressions (–16.7 vs –0.3, respectively; P <.001) and median operative times (191 vs 119 minutes, P <.001). There was no difference in demographics, procedural success rate, or complication rate between the periods. Conclusions: The learning curve for TOETVA was 11 cases for the surgeon evaluated in this series.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Learning Curve
Operative Time
Thyroidectomy
Thyroid Gland
Linear Models
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries
Demography
Tertiary Healthcare
Guidelines
Incidence

Keywords

  • remote-access thyroidectomy
  • surgical skill acquisition
  • transoral thyroidectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Learning Curve for Transoral Endoscopic Thyroid Lobectomy. / Razavi, Christopher R.; Vasiliou, Elya; Tufano, Ralph P; Russell, Jonathon.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e910daf8028b4296a3231eaadcd3550c,
title = "Learning Curve for Transoral Endoscopic Thyroid Lobectomy",
abstract = "Objective: To define the learning curve for transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via the vestibular approach (TOETVA). Study Design: Case series with planned data collection. Setting: Tertiary care academic hospital. Subjects and Methods: Included patients were those who met the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines for lobectomy and our group’s previously documented indications for TOETVA. Operative time (incision to closure) was used as a surrogate for procedural proficiency and plotted as a function of case number to determine a learning curve. A simple moving average of operative time was then calculated, with the proficiency case defined as the case number where the slope of this curve changed. Demographic/characteristic data, outcomes, and complications were compared between the skill acquisition period (case 1 to proficiency case) and the proficiency period (remaining cases). A linear regression model was then used to calculate and compare the slopes of the skill acquisition and proficiency periods in the “operative time versus case number” plot. Results: Thirty cases were attempted, with a procedural success rate of 29 of 30 (94{\%}) and no incidence of permanent mental nerve or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. The proficiency case was case 11. There was a statistically significant difference between the skill acquisition and proficiency periods in slopes of the linear regressions (–16.7 vs –0.3, respectively; P <.001) and median operative times (191 vs 119 minutes, P <.001). There was no difference in demographics, procedural success rate, or complication rate between the periods. Conclusions: The learning curve for TOETVA was 11 cases for the surgeon evaluated in this series.",
keywords = "remote-access thyroidectomy, surgical skill acquisition, transoral thyroidectomy",
author = "Razavi, {Christopher R.} and Elya Vasiliou and Tufano, {Ralph P} and Jonathon Russell",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0194599818795881",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning Curve for Transoral Endoscopic Thyroid Lobectomy

AU - Razavi, Christopher R.

AU - Vasiliou, Elya

AU - Tufano, Ralph P

AU - Russell, Jonathon

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: To define the learning curve for transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via the vestibular approach (TOETVA). Study Design: Case series with planned data collection. Setting: Tertiary care academic hospital. Subjects and Methods: Included patients were those who met the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines for lobectomy and our group’s previously documented indications for TOETVA. Operative time (incision to closure) was used as a surrogate for procedural proficiency and plotted as a function of case number to determine a learning curve. A simple moving average of operative time was then calculated, with the proficiency case defined as the case number where the slope of this curve changed. Demographic/characteristic data, outcomes, and complications were compared between the skill acquisition period (case 1 to proficiency case) and the proficiency period (remaining cases). A linear regression model was then used to calculate and compare the slopes of the skill acquisition and proficiency periods in the “operative time versus case number” plot. Results: Thirty cases were attempted, with a procedural success rate of 29 of 30 (94%) and no incidence of permanent mental nerve or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. The proficiency case was case 11. There was a statistically significant difference between the skill acquisition and proficiency periods in slopes of the linear regressions (–16.7 vs –0.3, respectively; P <.001) and median operative times (191 vs 119 minutes, P <.001). There was no difference in demographics, procedural success rate, or complication rate between the periods. Conclusions: The learning curve for TOETVA was 11 cases for the surgeon evaluated in this series.

AB - Objective: To define the learning curve for transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via the vestibular approach (TOETVA). Study Design: Case series with planned data collection. Setting: Tertiary care academic hospital. Subjects and Methods: Included patients were those who met the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines for lobectomy and our group’s previously documented indications for TOETVA. Operative time (incision to closure) was used as a surrogate for procedural proficiency and plotted as a function of case number to determine a learning curve. A simple moving average of operative time was then calculated, with the proficiency case defined as the case number where the slope of this curve changed. Demographic/characteristic data, outcomes, and complications were compared between the skill acquisition period (case 1 to proficiency case) and the proficiency period (remaining cases). A linear regression model was then used to calculate and compare the slopes of the skill acquisition and proficiency periods in the “operative time versus case number” plot. Results: Thirty cases were attempted, with a procedural success rate of 29 of 30 (94%) and no incidence of permanent mental nerve or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. The proficiency case was case 11. There was a statistically significant difference between the skill acquisition and proficiency periods in slopes of the linear regressions (–16.7 vs –0.3, respectively; P <.001) and median operative times (191 vs 119 minutes, P <.001). There was no difference in demographics, procedural success rate, or complication rate between the periods. Conclusions: The learning curve for TOETVA was 11 cases for the surgeon evaluated in this series.

KW - remote-access thyroidectomy

KW - surgical skill acquisition

KW - transoral thyroidectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052574070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052574070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0194599818795881

DO - 10.1177/0194599818795881

M3 - Article

C2 - 30126330

AN - SCOPUS:85052574070

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 0194-5998

ER -